From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>,
tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction's first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:32:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMn9dg8JNQm5Xl0p@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22738ee6-74e1-0090-4eb0-c08183bb16e8@tarantool.org>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:36:02PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > @@ -193,6 +196,16 @@ applier_writer_f(va_list ap)
> > applier->has_acks_to_send = false;
> > struct xrow_header xrow;
> > xrow_encode_vclock(&xrow, &replicaset.vclock);
> > + /*
> > + * For relay lag statistics we report last
> > + * written transaction timestamp in tm field.
> > + *
> > + * Replica might be dead already so we have to
> > + * test on each iteration.
> > + */
> > + struct replica *r = replica_by_id(replica_id);
> > + if (likely(r != NULL))
> > + xrow.tm = r->applier_txn_start_tm;
>
> How could a replica be dead here?
> AFAIR we delete a replica only when it's deleted from _cluster. Shouldn't
> the applier writer be dead as well by that time?
Before accessing replica_by_id we're sitting in event loop trying to
fetch data from the network. Which means an admin may cleanup the
entry manually before we get back to this code in result we will
get a nil dereference (if only I'm not missing something).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 15:55 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] relay: provide downstream lag information Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction's first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 19:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 9:36 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16 13:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-06-17 9:16 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 2/2] relay: provide information about downstream lag Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 19:21 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-08 8:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-08 9:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-08 18:15 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 10:03 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-17 6:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-17 9:01 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-17 9:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 19:20 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] relay: provide downstream lag information Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-07 20:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMn9dg8JNQm5Xl0p@grain \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction'\''s first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox