From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 1/1] applier: filter incoming synchro packets via transaction initiator
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 21:08:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMjsoeiJLnIAevUN@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMjdQxFYmdSzqcq7@grain>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 08:02:59PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:26:06PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> > > +box.space.sync:select{}
> > > + | ---
> > > + | - - [1]
> > > + | ...
> >
> > You need to wait for the space creation, just like
> > you do below. Otherwise the test'll be flaky.
> > Also, please see a comment regarding wait_lsn vs wait_cond
> > below.
>
> As being discussed due to quorum=2 and sync space we don't need
> to wait.
>
> > > +test_run:wait_cond(function() return \
> > > + box.space.sync ~= nil and \
> > > + box.space.sync:get{1} ~= nil and \
> > > + box.space.sync:get{1}[1] == 1 end, 100)
> > > + | ---
> > > + | - true
> > > + | ...
> >
> > I suggest you use wait_lsn('replica2', 'master') here
> > instead of this bulky wait_cond.
> > First of all, it takes a single line, instead of 4 lines.
> >
> > Secondly, you forgot to test `box.space.sync.index.pk ~= nil`, meaning
> > the test will still fail occasionally, when index creation doesn't replicate
> > in time.
>
> You mean something like below?
> ---
I force pushed an update.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 13:56 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 0/1] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 13:56 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 1/1] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 14:26 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 17:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-15 18:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-06-16 8:31 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16 8:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-16 8:16 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 21:49 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 0/1] " Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 22:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-18 22:58 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-19 11:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-20 14:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-20 17:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-21 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMjsoeiJLnIAevUN@grain \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v9 1/1] applier: filter incoming synchro packets via transaction initiator' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox