* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
@ 2021-06-02 15:59 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 11:00 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2021-06-02 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Munkin, Sergey Ostanevich; +Cc: tarantool-patches
This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
by commit 07c83aa ('build: adjust
LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead LUA_USE_ASSERT and
LUA_USE_APICHECK correspondingly. This patch fixes these typos.
Follows up #4862
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/tarantool-debug-fix
Also, LUAJIT_USE_ASAN -- is set, but LuaJIT checks for ENABLE_ASAN as
is with corresponding FIXME to implement ASAN correctly. But it
looks like it should be done in a separate patch by enabling all LuaJIT
build flags, see list of options here [1].
[1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/tarantool-patches/20210211192336.GC9361@root/
cmake/luajit.cmake | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmake/luajit.cmake b/cmake/luajit.cmake
index 6a94327a7..92cc88e70 100644
--- a/cmake/luajit.cmake
+++ b/cmake/luajit.cmake
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ set(LUAJIT_TEST_INIT "${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/luajit-test-init.lua"
# Enable internal LuaJIT assertions for Tarantool Debug build.
if(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
- set(LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK ON CACHE BOOL
+ set(LUA_USE_APICHECK ON CACHE BOOL
"Assertions for the Lua/C API" FORCE)
- set(LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT ON CACHE BOOL
+ set(LUA_USE_ASSERT ON CACHE BOOL
"Assertions for the whole LuaJIT VM" FORCE)
endif()
--
2.31.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
2021-06-02 15:59 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
@ 2021-06-04 11:00 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 16:40 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-12 12:32 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches @ 2021-06-04 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Hi!
Thanks for the fix!
LGTM.
Although I can’t figure out how it was tested in 07c83aa. If there were
no tests - the probably more misprints exist?
Sergos
> On 2 Jun 2021, at 18:59, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
> by commit 07c83aa ('build: adjust
> LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
> LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead LUA_USE_ASSERT and
> LUA_USE_APICHECK correspondingly. This patch fixes these typos.
>
> Follows up #4862
> ---
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/tarantool-debug-fix
>
>
> Also, LUAJIT_USE_ASAN -- is set, but LuaJIT checks for ENABLE_ASAN as
> is with corresponding FIXME to implement ASAN correctly. But it
> looks like it should be done in a separate patch by enabling all LuaJIT
> build flags, see list of options here [1].
>
> [1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/tarantool-patches/20210211192336.GC9361@root/
>
> cmake/luajit.cmake | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmake/luajit.cmake b/cmake/luajit.cmake
> index 6a94327a7..92cc88e70 100644
> --- a/cmake/luajit.cmake
> +++ b/cmake/luajit.cmake
> @@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ set(LUAJIT_TEST_INIT "${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/test/luajit-test-init.lua"
>
> # Enable internal LuaJIT assertions for Tarantool Debug build.
> if(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL "Debug")
> - set(LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK ON CACHE BOOL
> + set(LUA_USE_APICHECK ON CACHE BOOL
> "Assertions for the Lua/C API" FORCE)
> - set(LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT ON CACHE BOOL
> + set(LUA_USE_ASSERT ON CACHE BOOL
> "Assertions for the whole LuaJIT VM" FORCE)
> endif()
>
> --
> 2.31.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
2021-06-02 15:59 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 11:00 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
@ 2021-06-10 16:40 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-11 7:52 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-12 12:32 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches @ 2021-06-10 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Sergey,
Thanks for the patch! Please consider the nits below. Otherwise, LGTM.
On 02.06.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
> by commit 07c83aa ('build: adjust
Typo: Please use the full hash.
> LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
> LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead LUA_USE_ASSERT and
Typo: s/instead LUA_USE_ASSERT/instead of LUA_USE_ASSERT/.
> LUA_USE_APICHECK correspondingly. This patch fixes these typos.
Minor: s/correspondingly/respectively/.
>
> Follows up #4862
> ---
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/tarantool-debug-fix
>
>
> Also, LUAJIT_USE_ASAN -- is set, but LuaJIT checks for ENABLE_ASAN as
> is with corresponding FIXME to implement ASAN correctly. But it
> looks like it should be done in a separate patch by enabling all LuaJIT
> build flags, see list of options here [1].
BTW, we have a separate issue for enabling ASAN in LuaJIT[1].
>
> [1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/tarantool-patches/20210211192336.GC9361@root/
>
> cmake/luajit.cmake | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
<snipped>
>
> --
> 2.31.0
>
[1]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5878
--
Best regards,
IM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
2021-06-10 16:40 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
@ 2021-06-11 7:52 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2021-06-11 7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Munkin; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Hi, Igor!
Thanks for the review!
On 10.06.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> Thanks for the patch! Please consider the nits below. Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> On 02.06.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
> > by commit 07c83aa ('build: adjust
>
> Typo: Please use the full hash.
>
> > LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
> > LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead LUA_USE_ASSERT and
>
> Typo: s/instead LUA_USE_ASSERT/instead of LUA_USE_ASSERT/.
>
> > LUA_USE_APICHECK correspondingly. This patch fixes these typos.
>
> Minor: s/correspondingly/respectively/.
Fixed all suggestions, the new commit message is the following:
===================================================================
build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
by commit 07c83aab5c066ca75c149112b331b4dbb81b3f38 ('build: adjust
LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead of LUA_USE_ASSERT
and LUA_USE_APICHECK respectively. This patch fixes these typos.
Follows up #4862
===================================================================
Branch is force-pushed.
>
> >
> > Follows up #4862
> > ---
> >
> > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/tarantool-debug-fix
> >
> >
> > Also, LUAJIT_USE_ASAN -- is set, but LuaJIT checks for ENABLE_ASAN as
> > is with corresponding FIXME to implement ASAN correctly. But it
> > looks like it should be done in a separate patch by enabling all LuaJIT
> > build flags, see list of options here [1].
>
> BTW, we have a separate issue for enabling ASAN in LuaJIT[1].
>
> >
> > [1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/tarantool-patches/20210211192336.GC9361@root/
> >
> > cmake/luajit.cmake | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
> <snipped>
>
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.0
> >
>
> [1]: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5878
>
> --
> Best regards,
> IM
--
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions
2021-06-02 15:59 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 11:00 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 16:40 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
@ 2021-06-12 12:32 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches @ 2021-06-12 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Kaplun; +Cc: tarantool-patches
Sergey,
I've checked the patch into 1.10, 2.7, 2.8 and master.
On 02.06.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> This patch fixes inaccuracy in Tarantool build configuration introduced
> by commit 07c83aa ('build: adjust
> LuaJIT build system'). That patch sets LUAJIT_USE_ASSERT and
> LUAJIT_USE_APICHECK options for Debug build instead LUA_USE_ASSERT and
> LUA_USE_APICHECK correspondingly. This patch fixes these typos.
>
> Follows up #4862
> ---
>
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/tarantool-debug-fix
>
<snipped>
>
> --
> 2.31.0
>
--
Best regards,
IM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-12 12:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-02 15:59 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] build: fix debug flags for LuaJIT assertions Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-04 11:00 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-10 16:40 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-11 7:52 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-06-12 12:32 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox