From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 19:18:17 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YLpSSTN3j0k7OY1o@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <BFEF7BA1-3F26-452F-9D18-35422EEA9454@tarantool.org> On 04.06.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the update. > I was bad in my ASCII art. The change I expected was > > > +-- Memprof is implemented for x86 and x64 architectures only. Sure! Fixed. Branch is force-pushed. =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua index 96beb680..06d96b3b 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ --- Memprof is implemented for only x86 and x64 architectures. +-- Memprof is implemented for x86 and x64 architectures only. require("utils").skipcond( jit.arch ~= "x86" and jit.arch ~= "x64", jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof" =================================================================== > > LGTM > Sergos > > > > On 4 Jun 2021, at 16:37, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for the review! > > > > On 02.06.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Thanks for the patch! > >> Just one fixup is needed. > >> > >> Sergos > >> > >>> On 24 May 2021, at 16:27, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64, > >>> because memprof is not yet implemented for them. > >>> > >>> This patch adds skip condition to corresponding test. > >>> --- > >>> test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 6 ++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > >>> index b4d66509..4df9cfd8 100644 > >>> --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > >>> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > >>> @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > >>> +-- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures. > >> ^^^^ ——> ^ > >>> +require("utils").skipcond( > >>> + jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64", > >> > >> I believe you overcomplicated the condition so it’ll skip even for > >> mentioned archs > >> > >> tarantool> x='x86' > >> --- > >> ... > >> > >> tarantool> x~='x86' or x~='x64' > >> --- > >> - true > >> ... > >> > > > > Thanks, nice catch! > > > > Fixed. > > Branch is force-pushed. > > > > =================================================================== > > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > index 4df9cfd8..96beb680 100644 > > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > --- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures. > > +-- Memprof is implemented for only x86 and x64 architectures. > > require("utils").skipcond( > > - jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64", > > + jit.arch ~= "x86" and jit.arch ~= "x64", > > jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof" > > ) > > > > @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ local free = fill_ev_type(events, symbols, "free") > > -- the number of allocations. > > -- 1 event - alocation of table by itself + 1 allocation > > -- of array part as far it is bigger than LJ_MAX_COLOSIZE (16). > > -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 21, 19, 2)) > > +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 27, 25, 2)) > > -- 100 strings allocations. > > -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 26, 19, 100)) > > +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 32, 25, 100)) > > > > -- Collect all previous allocated objects. > > test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102) > > @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102) > > -- Tests for leak-only option. > > -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812 <https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812>. > > local heap_delta = process.form_heap_delta(events, symbols) > > -local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(21)] > > -local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(26)] > > +local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(27)] > > +local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(32)] > > test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.nalloc == tab_alloc_stats.nfree) > > test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.dbytes == 0) > > test:ok(str_alloc_stats.nalloc == str_alloc_stats.nfree) > > =================================================================== > > > >> > >> > >>> + jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof" > >>> +) > >>> + > >>> local tap = require("tap") > >>> > >>> local test = tap.test("misc-memprof-lapi") > >>> -- > >>> 2.31.0 > >>> > >> > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Sergey Kaplun > -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 16:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-24 13:27 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] ARM, ARM64, PPC: Fix TSETR fallback Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:04 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:12 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 15:33 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 15:39 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:47 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-12 13:09 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:28 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:37 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 15:36 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 16:18 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:18 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:47 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:45 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case (really) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 14:43 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:56 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:52 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:08 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-01 11:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-12 16:02 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YLpSSTN3j0k7OY1o@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=sergos@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox