From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:37:19 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YLosjw8cGrZlIkOv@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <7D81109B-6734-42E4-914D-2567D1438BE4@tarantool.org> Hi! Thanks for the review! On 02.06.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote: > Hi! > > Thanks for the patch! > Just one fixup is needed. > > Sergos > > > On 24 May 2021, at 16:27, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org> wrote: > > > > Memprof's tests fail for architectures different from x86 and x64, > > because memprof is not yet implemented for them. > > > > This patch adds skip condition to corresponding test. > > --- > > test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > index b4d66509..4df9cfd8 100644 > > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua > > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > > +-- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures. > ^^^^ ——> ^ > > +require("utils").skipcond( > > + jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64", > > I believe you overcomplicated the condition so it’ll skip even for > mentioned archs > > tarantool> x='x86' > --- > ... > > tarantool> x~='x86' or x~='x64' > --- > - true > ... > Thanks, nice catch! Fixed. Branch is force-pushed. =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua index 4df9cfd8..96beb680 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-memprof-lapi.test.lua @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- Memprof is implemented only for x86 and x64 architectures. +-- Memprof is implemented for only x86 and x64 architectures. require("utils").skipcond( - jit.arch ~= "x86" or jit.arch ~= "x64", + jit.arch ~= "x86" and jit.arch ~= "x64", jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof" ) @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ local free = fill_ev_type(events, symbols, "free") -- the number of allocations. -- 1 event - alocation of table by itself + 1 allocation -- of array part as far it is bigger than LJ_MAX_COLOSIZE (16). -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 21, 19, 2)) +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 27, 25, 2)) -- 100 strings allocations. -test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 26, 19, 100)) +test:ok(check_alloc_report(alloc, 32, 25, 100)) -- Collect all previous allocated objects. test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102) @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ test:ok(free.INTERNAL.num == 102) -- Tests for leak-only option. -- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5812. local heap_delta = process.form_heap_delta(events, symbols) -local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(21)] -local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(26)] +local tab_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(27)] +local str_alloc_stats = heap_delta[form_source_line(32)] test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.nalloc == tab_alloc_stats.nfree) test:ok(tab_alloc_stats.dbytes == 0) test:ok(str_alloc_stats.nalloc == str_alloc_stats.nfree) =================================================================== > > > > + jit.arch.." architecture is NIY for memprof" > > +) > > + > > local tap = require("tap") > > > > local test = tap.test("misc-memprof-lapi") > > -- > > 2.31.0 > > > -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 13:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-24 13:27 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] ARM, ARM64, PPC: Fix TSETR fallback Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:04 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:12 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 15:33 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 15:39 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:47 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-12 13:09 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:28 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:37 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-06-04 15:36 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 16:18 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:18 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 12:47 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:45 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:51 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-05-24 13:27 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/4] ARM64: Fix xpcall() error case (really) Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-02 14:43 ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-04 13:56 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-10 13:52 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-11 8:08 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-01 11:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Fix LuaJIT tests on aarch64, odroid Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-12 16:02 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YLosjw8cGrZlIkOv@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=sergos@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] test: add skipcond on architectures for memprof' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox