From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/9] wal: enrich row's meta information with sync replication flags
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:09:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHWYC9vCSlrIpJ4T@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d29b025b7213b5c9596715d849b4b371e1fef32.1618256019.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:40:14PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> @@ -996,7 +996,13 @@ wal_assign_lsn(struct vclock *vclock_diff, struct vclock *base,
> first_glob_row = row;
> }
> (*row)->tsn = tsn == 0 ? (*start)->lsn : tsn;
> - (*row)->is_commit = row == end - 1;
> + if (row < end - 1)
> + continue;
These two lines ^^
Serge, why we need `continue` here at all? Why can't we simply drop the
above `if` saving a branch?
> + /* Tx meta is stored in the last tx row. */
> + if (row == end - 1) {
> + (*row)->opt_flags = entry->opt_flags;
> + (*row)->is_commit = true;
> + }
IOW, I mean
(*row)->tsn = tsn == 0 ? (*start)->lsn : tsn;
(*row)->is_commit = row == end - 1;
if (row == end - 1) {
// Save meta
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 19:40 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/9] raft: introduce manual elections and fix a bug with re-applying rolled back transactions Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/9] wal: enrich row's meta information with sync replication flags Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 11:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 13:51 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 14:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 13:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-04-13 13:29 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 2/9] xrow: introduce a PROMOTE entry Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 14:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 9:12 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 10:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/9] box: actualise iproto_key_type array Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 4/9] box: make clear_synchro_queue() write a PROMOTE entry instead of CONFIRM + ROLLBACK Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 14:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 8:23 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 8:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-14 9:12 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 5/9] box: write PROMOTE even for empty limbo Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 6/9] raft: keep track of greatest known term and filter replication sources based on that Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 7/9] replication: introduce a new election mode: "manual" Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 8/9] Support manual elections in `box.ctl.clear_synchro_queue()` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-12 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 9/9] box.ctl: rename clear_synchro_queue to promote Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-13 14:42 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/9] raft: introduce manual elections and fix a bug with re-applying rolled back transactions Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHWYC9vCSlrIpJ4T@grain \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/9] wal: enrich row'\''s meta information with sync replication flags' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox