Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] tools: make memprof parser output user-friendly
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:56:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGH4ka4QkqKUxoXa@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CF3D414F-1F7C-491A-AEEB-0FE80320108E@tarantool.org>

Hi, Sergos!

Thanks for the review!

On 29.03.21, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Thank you for the patch and review!
> 
> Let me propose some technical fix:
> 
> long/path/to/function.lua: 3 events
> very/long/path/to/function.lua:	3 events
> 
> I think dump as above is not-so-readable for humans. A single-symbol fixup gives 
> 
> long/path/to/function.lua:	3 events
> very/long/path/to/function.lua:	3 events
> 
> +    print(string.format("%s:\t%d events\t+%d bytes\t-%d bytes",
> 
> The better solution would be to keep the longest name and append/prepend all of them
> with spaces, so that the following will not happen:

Yep, I agree. We should count the length of each section:
* filename
* number of events
* allocated bytes
* freed bytes

I suppose, we should create a new one "good first issue" to someone to
onboard in Lua and LuaJIT in particular. Thoughts?

> 
> long/path/to/funct.lua:	3 events
> very/long/path/to/funct.lua:	3 events
> 
> 
> All of these are too much ‘vkusovschina’, so you have my LGTM.
> 
> Sergos
> 
> 
> 
> > On 29 Mar 2021, at 16:00, Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org <mailto:skaplun@tarantool.org>> wrote:
> > 
> > Igor,
> > 
> > On 29.03.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> >> Sergey,
> >> 
> >> Thanks for the fixes! I'll push it to the trunk as soon as Sergos gives
> >> his LGTM.
> >> 
> >> On 29.03.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> >>> Igor,
> >>> 
> >>> Thanks for the review!
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> <snipped>
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Missed ChangeLog entry, feel free to change it at your pleasure:
> >> 
> >> Great, thanks! I propose the following wording:
> > 
> > Thanks! I like it, exept some typos:
> > 
> >> 
> >> | ##feature/luajit
> >> |
> >> | * Make LuaJIT memory profiler parser output more user-friendly (gh-5811).
> >> |   Now the source line definition where the event occurs is much clearer:
> >> |   only source file name and allocation-related line are presented,
> > 
> > Typo? s/are presented/is presented/
> > 
> >> |   function definition line number is omitted. Moreover, event-related
> > 
> > Typo: /function definition line number/the function definition line number/.
> > 
> >> |   statistics are indicated with units.
> >> |   **Breaking change**: Line info of the line function definition is
> >> |   saved in symbol info table by field `linedefined` now and field `name`
> >> |   is renamed to `source` with the respect to Lua Debug API.
> > 
> > Typo: s/to Lua Debug/to the Lua Debug/
> > 
> >> 
> > 
> > <snipped>
> > 
> >>>>> -- 
> >>>>> 2.31.0
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> IM
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Sergey Kaplun
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Best regards,
> >> IM
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards,
> > Sergey Kaplun
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 16:48 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:33 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29  9:46   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 11:16     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 13:00       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 15:41         ` Sergey Ostanevich via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 15:56           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-03-29 19:11         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 21:58 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGH4ka4QkqKUxoXa@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergos@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] tools: make memprof parser output user-friendly' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox