From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/1] applier: process synchro rows after WAL write Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:46:48 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YG7fGGs2WbV8ap16@grain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <72609da5-e79f-dd29-c69e-77090ea06df2@tarantool.org> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 01:32:06PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: > > Serge, you mean the scenario when some instances in replicaset > > have the patch applied and some are not? > > No. Let's suppose everyone has this patch applied. > Now look at one particular instance. It may happen that while one of > its appliers is writing this synchro row (either CONFIRM or ROLLBACK, > doesn't matter), some other applier may still apply requests coming > from other replicaset members. Ah, indeed. I must confess I forgot that there are a number of applier fibers and blocking write does block only the fiber which has initiated the write procedure, not other fibers. > I was wondering what would happen if someone else sent this instance > another synchro row. Looks like nothing bad but I just wanted to > double-check. > > And looks like there's a bug, which I'm speaking of below. It's about > someone sending us normal rows (either synchronous transactions or > asynchronous, but not CONFIRM/ROLLBACK entries) while we're waiting for > syncro row's write to end. > > Say, limbo was owned by instance 1, and instance 2 has written CONFIRM > for everything there was. While we wait for 2's CONFIRM to be written to > WAL, we may receive some rows from instance 3, who has already applied 2's > CONFIRM. Since we haven't written the CONFIRM yet, we haven't applied it, > and the limbo on our instance still isn't empty. All the rows coming from > 3 will get rejected and replication between 3 and us will be broken. Hmm, looks so, need to think about.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 10:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-07 22:47 Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-08 8:39 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-08 10:19 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-08 10:32 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-08 10:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-04-08 22:57 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-09 8:25 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-09 21:32 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-08 22:56 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-04-09 8:26 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YG7fGGs2WbV8ap16@grain \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/1] applier: process synchro rows after WAL write' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox