Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 1/3] gc/xlog: delay xlog cleanup until relays are subscribed
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:04:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YF2Hm6AmrBviggTl@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aee215d-4a5a-1fba-bea1-510a5ced6287@tarantool.org>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:51:57AM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> > 
> > Most important reason is an epsilon value on hw level, how many
> > users remember what exactly range the "machine zero" covers?
> 
> I don't remember, and I don't see why should I really. What is the
> reason you ban 0.0009 but allow 0.001? This looks random and does
> not protect from anything.
> 
> > Do we really want to allow precision close to nanoseconds?
> 
> We allow double. Whatever precision it gives.

OK, thanks for explanation.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 16:37 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 0/3] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 16:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 1/3] " Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 22:10   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 11:25     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 19:59       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 21:02         ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 21:29           ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 23:50             ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26  7:04               ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 23:51           ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26  7:04             ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-03-24 16:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/3] test: add a test for wal_cleanup_delay option Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 22:10   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 12:07     ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 19:56       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-25 20:19         ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 16:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 3/3] test: box-tap/gc -- add test for is_paused field Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YF2Hm6AmrBviggTl@grain \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 1/3] gc/xlog: delay xlog cleanup until relays are subscribed' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox