From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: yield explicitly every N sent rows Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 01:25:59 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YCcAd51V45GVFekN@grain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <b26797a1-ae3b-7c51-6dfe-0733a460c721@tarantool.org> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:48:49PM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote: > > diff --git a/src/box/relay.cc b/src/box/relay.cc > > index df04f8198..afc57dfbc 100644 > > --- a/src/box/relay.cc > > +++ b/src/box/relay.cc > > @@ -836,11 +836,20 @@ relay_send(struct relay *relay, struct xrow_header *packet) > > { > > ERROR_INJECT_YIELD(ERRINJ_RELAY_SEND_DELAY); > > > > + static uint64_t row_cnt = 0; > > Relays are in threads. So this variable either should be thread-local, > or be in struct relay. Otherwise you get non-atomic updates which may > lead to some increments disappearing. That's the good catch! Without lock/tls this gonna be completely arbritrary updates. > Given that thread-local variable access is not free, I would go for > having it in struct relay, but up to you. Actually tls access should be as cheap as regular memory access except using different base register (iirc %fs on linux). But maybe things are changed novadays.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-12 22:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-12 11:25 Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 11:37 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 11:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 12:08 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 17:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 21:48 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-12 22:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-02-15 8:45 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-15 8:40 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-17 21:11 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-18 20:24 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-23 22:30 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 9:48 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 10:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 10:35 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 12:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 12:14 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-24 22:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-26 8:41 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-26 20:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-01 11:25 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-01 21:24 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-03-02 9:52 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YCcAd51V45GVFekN@grain \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] relay: yield explicitly every N sent rows' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox