From: Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] txn: convert flags to explicit bitfield Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:32:57 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YC4mOR0bvnXRyvsl@grain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YC2OlDido/bCoQTS@grain> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:45:56AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:15:30PM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote: > > Hi! Thanks for the patch! > > > > > @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ txn_complete_fail(struct txn *txn) > > > txn_rollback_one_stmt(txn, stmt); > > > if (txn->engine != NULL) > > > engine_rollback(txn->engine, txn); > > > - if (txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS)) > > > + if (txn->flags & TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS) > > > > 1. Did you do a self-review before sending this? Can you > > tell yourself what is wrong here? > > Yes I did, and I don't get what's wrong with this line? Previously > we have `if (txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS))` where txn_has_flag > get expanded to > > return (txn->flags & TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS) != 0; > > so where is an error? > > > 2. What was wrong with the idea of having the helpers > > but operating on bitfields? And having has_flags() instead > > of has_flag() to check presense of all specified flags + > > clear_flags() to remove all specified flags. > > > > I don't understand. I think we discussed it already 2 or 3 > > times and all seemed to agree? > > The initial idea was to operate with flags directly, you pointed > that lines of code as if (!(txn->flags & mask)) violates our > code style. Then we thought of renaming the helpers to txn_x_flags > to operate with multiple flags, which lead us to a vague moment -- > it is unclear how exactly txn_has_flag should operate: exact > matching or any matching? > > Finlly I simply moved back to direct access to the fields > with explicit `!= 0` or `== 0` form. Anyway, here is an another approach, sitting in gorcunov/gh-5128-txn-flags-5 branch --- From 0e4484213d53f58e34db16e3cb96c63805bdd5e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:19:12 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] txn: convert flags to explicit bitfield Instead of shifting flags inside txn_x_flag() helpers lets define precompiled value. This allows us to operate with several flags at onces and shrink code a bit. Closes #5128 Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> --- src/box/applier.cc | 4 ++-- src/box/memtx_engine.c | 2 +- src/box/txn.c | 15 +++++++-------- src/box/txn.h | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- src/box/txn_limbo.c | 9 +++------ test/unit/snap_quorum_delay.cc | 3 +-- 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/box/applier.cc b/src/box/applier.cc index 553db76fc..8d7ce5d99 100644 --- a/src/box/applier.cc +++ b/src/box/applier.cc @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ apply_snapshot_row(struct xrow_header *row) * Do not wait for confirmation when fetching a snapshot. * Master only sends confirmed rows during join. */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); if (txn_begin_stmt(txn, space) != 0) goto rollback; /* no access checks here - applier always works with admin privs */ @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ apply_final_join_row(struct xrow_header *row) * Do not wait for confirmation while processing final * join rows. See apply_snapshot_row(). */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); if (apply_row(row) != 0) { txn_rollback(txn); fiber_gc(); diff --git a/src/box/memtx_engine.c b/src/box/memtx_engine.c index 1174234d2..a4cd671f5 100644 --- a/src/box/memtx_engine.c +++ b/src/box/memtx_engine.c @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ memtx_engine_recover_snapshot_row(struct memtx_engine *memtx, * Snapshot rows are confirmed by definition. They don't need to go to * the synchronous transactions limbo. */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC); rc = txn_commit(txn); /* * Don't let gc pool grow too much. Yet to diff --git a/src/box/txn.c b/src/box/txn.c index a5edbfc60..71c89ce5f 100644 --- a/src/box/txn.c +++ b/src/box/txn.c @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ txn_begin(void) * It's a responsibility of an engine to disable yields * if they are not supported. */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); return txn; } @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ txn_free_or_wakeup(struct txn *txn) if (txn->fiber == NULL) txn_free(txn); else { - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_IS_DONE); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_IS_DONE); if (txn->fiber != fiber()) /* Wake a waiting fiber up. */ fiber_wakeup(txn->fiber); @@ -642,8 +642,7 @@ txn_journal_entry_new(struct txn *txn) */ if (!txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_FORCE_ASYNC)) { if (is_sync) { - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_WAIT_ACK); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC | TXN_WAIT_ACK); } else if (!txn_limbo_is_empty(&txn_limbo)) { /* * There some sync entries on the @@ -652,7 +651,7 @@ txn_journal_entry_new(struct txn *txn) * doesn't touch sync space (each sync txn * should be considered as a barrier). */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); } } @@ -994,10 +993,10 @@ txn_can_yield(struct txn *txn, bool set) assert(txn == in_txn()); bool could = txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); if (set && !could) { - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); trigger_clear(&txn->fiber_on_yield); } else if (!set && could) { - txn_clear_flag(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); + txn_clear_flags(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD); trigger_create(&txn->fiber_on_yield, txn_on_yield, NULL, NULL); trigger_add(&fiber()->on_yield, &txn->fiber_on_yield); } @@ -1229,6 +1228,6 @@ txn_on_yield(struct trigger *trigger, void *event) assert(txn != NULL); assert(!txn_has_flag(txn, TXN_CAN_YIELD)); txn_rollback_to_svp(txn, NULL); - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_IS_ABORTED_BY_YIELD); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_IS_ABORTED_BY_YIELD); return 0; } diff --git a/src/box/txn.h b/src/box/txn.h index fca9bc1d0..29fe6d5ce 100644 --- a/src/box/txn.h +++ b/src/box/txn.h @@ -56,25 +56,25 @@ struct Vdbe; enum txn_flag { /** Transaction has been processed. */ - TXN_IS_DONE, + TXN_IS_DONE = 0x1, /** * Transaction has been aborted by fiber yield so * should be rolled back at commit. */ - TXN_IS_ABORTED_BY_YIELD, + TXN_IS_ABORTED_BY_YIELD = 0x2, /** * fiber_yield() is allowed inside the transaction. * See txn_can_yield() for more details. */ - TXN_CAN_YIELD, + TXN_CAN_YIELD = 0x4, /** on_commit and/or on_rollback list is not empty. */ - TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS, + TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS = 0x8, /** * Synchronous transaction touched sync spaces, or an * asynchronous transaction blocked by a sync one until it * is confirmed. */ - TXN_WAIT_SYNC, + TXN_WAIT_SYNC = 0x10, /** * Synchronous transaction 'waiting for ACKs' state before * commit. In this state it waits until it is replicated @@ -82,14 +82,14 @@ enum txn_flag { * commit and returns success to a user. * TXN_WAIT_SYNC is always set, if TXN_WAIT_ACK is set. */ - TXN_WAIT_ACK, + TXN_WAIT_ACK = 0x20, /** * A transaction may be forced to be asynchronous, not * wait for any ACKs, and not depend on prepending sync * transactions. This happens in a few special cases. For * example, when applier receives snapshot from master. */ - TXN_FORCE_ASYNC, + TXN_FORCE_ASYNC = 0x40, }; enum { @@ -396,19 +396,20 @@ struct txn { static inline bool txn_has_flag(struct txn *txn, enum txn_flag flag) { - return (txn->flags & (1 << flag)) != 0; + assert((flag & (flag - 1)) == 0); + return (txn->flags & flag) != 0; } static inline void -txn_set_flag(struct txn *txn, enum txn_flag flag) +txn_set_flags(struct txn *txn, unsigned int flags) { - txn->flags |= 1 << flag; + txn->flags |= flags; } static inline void -txn_clear_flag(struct txn *txn, enum txn_flag flag) +txn_clear_flags(struct txn *txn, unsigned int flags) { - txn->flags &= ~(1 << flag); + txn->flags &= ~flags; } /* Pointer to the current transaction (if any) */ @@ -491,7 +492,7 @@ txn_init_triggers(struct txn *txn) rlist_create(&txn->on_commit); rlist_create(&txn->on_rollback); rlist_create(&txn->on_wal_write); - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_HAS_TRIGGERS); } } diff --git a/src/box/txn_limbo.c b/src/box/txn_limbo.c index 9c4c3cdf1..cf0ad9350 100644 --- a/src/box/txn_limbo.c +++ b/src/box/txn_limbo.c @@ -266,8 +266,7 @@ txn_limbo_wait_complete(struct txn_limbo *limbo, struct txn_limbo_entry *entry) in_queue, tmp) { e->txn->signature = TXN_SIGNATURE_QUORUM_TIMEOUT; txn_limbo_abort(limbo, e); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_ACK); + txn_clear_flags(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC | TXN_WAIT_ACK); txn_complete_fail(e->txn); if (e == entry) break; @@ -399,8 +398,7 @@ txn_limbo_read_confirm(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn) } e->is_commit = true; txn_limbo_remove(limbo, e); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_ACK); + txn_clear_flags(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC | TXN_WAIT_ACK); /* * If already written to WAL by now, finish tx processing. * Otherwise just clear the sync flags. Tx procesing will finish @@ -456,8 +454,7 @@ txn_limbo_read_rollback(struct txn_limbo *limbo, int64_t lsn) return; rlist_foreach_entry_safe_reverse(e, &limbo->queue, in_queue, tmp) { txn_limbo_abort(limbo, e); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); - txn_clear_flag(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_ACK); + txn_clear_flags(e->txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC | TXN_WAIT_ACK); if (e->txn->signature >= 0) { /* Rollback the transaction. */ e->txn->signature = TXN_SIGNATURE_SYNC_ROLLBACK; diff --git a/test/unit/snap_quorum_delay.cc b/test/unit/snap_quorum_delay.cc index b9d4cc6c4..803bbbea8 100644 --- a/test/unit/snap_quorum_delay.cc +++ b/test/unit/snap_quorum_delay.cc @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ txn_process_func(va_list ap) struct txn *txn = txn_begin(); txn->fiber = fiber(); /* Simulate a sync transaction. */ - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC); - txn_set_flag(txn, TXN_WAIT_ACK); + txn_set_flags(txn, TXN_WAIT_SYNC | TXN_WAIT_ACK); /* * The true way to push the transaction to limbo is to call * txn_commit() for sync transaction. But, if txn_commit() -- 2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 8:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-02-15 14:01 Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-17 21:15 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-17 21:45 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-02-18 8:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-02-23 21:37 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YC4mOR0bvnXRyvsl@grain \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] txn: convert flags to explicit bitfield' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox