From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix os.date() for wider libc strftime() compatibility. Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 22:28:52 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <Y9wO9Apm2ihZGkcF@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1675294884.480320482@f477.i.mail.ru> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the review! Fixed your comments, branch is force-pushed. On 02.02.23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: > > Hi, Sergey! > Thanks for the patch! > LGTM, except for a few nits below. > > > >>From: Mike Pall <mike> > >> > >>Thanks to Jesper Lundgren. > >> > >>(cherry picked from commit fc63c938b522e147ea728b75f385728bf4a8fc35) > >> > >>When `strftime()` returns empty result (for example, for "%p" on some > >>locales or when LuaJIT is built with musl's `strftime()` and format > >>string is invalid), the `os.date()` endless retries to format result > >Typo: s/endless/endlessly/ > >Typo: s/format result/format the result/ Fixed, thanks! > >>and reallocates buffer for resulting string. This leads to OOM. > >Typo: s/buffer for resulting/the buffer for the resulting/ Fixed, thanks! > >> > >>This patch limits amount of retries by 4. > >Typo: s/amount/the amount/ Fixed, thanks! > >Side note: Why is it exactly 4? That's what she said:) > >> > >>Sergey Kaplun: > >>* added the description and the test for the problem > >> > >>Part of tarantool/tarantool#8069 > >>--- > >> > >>PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/8237 > >>Issues: > >>* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/463 > >>* https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/8069 > >>Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-463-os-date-oom-full-ci > >> > >> src/lib_os.c | 4 ++-- > >> .../lj-463-os-date-oom.test.lua | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-463-os-date-oom.test.lua > >> > >>diff --git a/src/lib_os.c b/src/lib_os.c > >>index 9e78d49a..ffbc3fdc 100644 > >>--- a/src/lib_os.c > >>+++ b/src/lib_os.c > >>@@ -205,12 +205,12 @@ LJLIB_CF(os_date) > >> setboolfield(L, "isdst", stm->tm_isdst); > >> } else if (*s) { > >> SBuf *sb = &G(L)->tmpbuf; > >>- MSize sz = 0; > >>+ MSize sz = 0, retry = 4; > >> const char *q; > >> for (q = s; *q; q++) > >> sz += (*q == '%') ? 30 : 1; /* Overflow doesn't matter. */ > >> setsbufL(sb, L); > >>- for (;;) { > >>+ while (retry--) { /* Limit growth for invalid format or empty result. */ > >> char *buf = lj_buf_need(sb, sz); > >> size_t len = strftime(buf, sbufsz(sb), s, stm); > >> if (len) { > >>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-463-os-date-oom.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-463-os-date-oom.test.lua > >>new file mode 100644 > >>index 00000000..cce78b6e > >>--- /dev/null > >>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-463-os-date-oom.test.lua > >>@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > >>+local tap = require('tap') > >>+ > >>+-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/463 . > >>+local test = tap.test('lj-463-os-date-oom') > >>+test:plan(1) > >>+ > >>+-- The ru_RU.utf8 locale is chosen as one that will be set on a > >>+-- developer's PC with high possibility. It may be unavailable at > >Typo: s/with high possibility/with a high probability/ Fixed. > >>+-- CI, so don't check the status and result of function calls. > >>+-- If it's unavailable `os.setlocale()` does nothing. > >>+-- Before the patch, the call to `os.date('%p')` on non-standard > >>+-- locale may lead to OOM. > >>+ > >>+os.setlocale('ru_RU.utf8') > >>+os.date('%p') > >>+ > >>+test:ok(true, 'os.date() finished without OOM') > >>+ > >>+os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1) > >>-- > >>2.34.1 > >-- > >Best regards, > >Maxim Kokryashkin > > -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 19:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-02-01 7:46 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-01 23:41 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-02 19:28 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2023-02-02 21:08 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-02 22:28 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-03 8:32 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-03 13:28 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches 2023-02-20 9:57 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Y9wO9Apm2ihZGkcF@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix os.date() for wider libc strftime() compatibility.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox