From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] x64/LJ_GC64: Fix type-check-only variant of SLOAD. Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 11:49:08 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <Y48CBInLiNT02s+k@root> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1670310532.819331928@f211.i.mail.ru> Hi, Maxim! Thanks for the review! Fixed you comments. On 06.12.22, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote: > > Hi, Sergey! > Thanks for the patch! > Please consider my comments below. > > <snipped> > >>--- > >> > >>Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-350-fix-sload-typecheck-full-ci > >>Issues: > >>* https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/7230 > >>* https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/350 > >>Tarantool PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/7995 > >> > >> src/lj_asm_x86.h | 2 +- > >> .../lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> .../lj-408-tonumber-cdata-record.test.lua | 10 ----- > >> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua > >> > >>diff --git a/src/lj_asm_x86.h b/src/lj_asm_x86.h > >>index 8a4d4025..8efda8e5 100644 > >>--- a/src/lj_asm_x86.h > >>+++ b/src/lj_asm_x86.h <snipped> > >>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua > >>new file mode 100644 > >>index 00000000..6ffc61fb > >>--- /dev/null > >>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua > >>@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > >>+local tap = require('tap') > >>+local traceinfo = require('jit.util').traceinfo > >>+ > >>+-- Test file to demonstrate the incorrect GC64 JIT asembling > >>+-- `IR_SLOAD`. > >>+-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/pull/350 . > >>+local test = tap.test('lj-350-sload-typecheck') > >>+ > >>+test:plan(1) > >>+ > >>+-- Contains only IR_SLOAD after recording. > >>+local function sload(arg) > >>+ return arg > >>+end > >>+ > >>+local tab_arg = {} > >>+ > >>+-- Reset JIT, remove any other traces. > >>+jit.off() > >>+jit.flush() > >>+ > >>+assert(not traceinfo(1), 'no traces compiled after flush') > >>+ > >>+-- Try to executed compiled trace wiht IR_SLOAD, if emitted mcode > >Typo: s/to executed/to execute > >Typo: s/wiht/with > >Typo: s/if emitted/if the emmited Fixed. > >>+-- is incorrect, assertion guard type check will failed even for > >Typo: s/failed/fail > >Typo: s/for/ for the Fixed. See the iterative patch below: =================================================================== diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua index 6ffc61fb..33794943 100644 --- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-350-sload-typecheck.test.lua @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ jit.flush() assert(not traceinfo(1), 'no traces compiled after flush') --- Try to executed compiled trace wiht IR_SLOAD, if emitted mcode --- is incorrect, assertion guard type check will failed even for --- correct type of argument and a new trace is recorded. +-- Try to execute the compiled trace with IR_SLOAD, if the emitted +-- mcode is incorrect, assertion guard type check will fail even +-- for the correct type of argument and a new trace is recorded. jit.opt.start('hotloop=1', 'hotexit=1') jit.on() =================================================================== Branch is force-pushed. > >>+-- correct type of argument and a new trace is recorded. > >>+jit.opt.start('hotloop=1', 'hotexit=1') > >>+ > >>+jit.on() > >>+ > >>+-- Make the function hot. > >>+sload(tab_arg) > >>+-- Compile the trace. > >>+sload(tab_arg) > >>+-- Execute trace and try to compile a trace from the side exit. > >>+sload(tab_arg) > >>+ > >>+jit.off() > >>+ > >>+test:ok(not traceinfo(2), 'the second trace should not be compiled') > >>+ > >>+os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1) > >Also, that test passes even without the patch on Linux x86_64 GC64: OFF Yes, because patch fixes the behaviour only for GC64 as mentioned in the commit message. > >>diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-408-tonumber-cdata-record.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-408-tonumber-cdata-record.test.lua > >>index bf9e8e46..a8235e93 100644 > >>--- a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-408-tonumber-cdata-record.test.lua > >>+++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-408-tonumber-cdata-record.test.lua <snipped> > >>2.34.1 > >-- > >Best regards, > >Maxim Kokryashkin -- Best regards, Sergey Kaplun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 8:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-12-02 8:42 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2022-12-06 7:08 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2022-12-06 8:49 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2022-12-06 13:06 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches 2022-12-15 15:49 ` sergos via Tarantool-patches 2022-12-16 8:13 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2023-01-12 14:55 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Y48CBInLiNT02s+k@root \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] x64/LJ_GC64: Fix type-check-only variant of SLOAD.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox