From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, skaplun@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix recording of __concat metamethod.
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:46:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cd5bacd-99e0-4227-b15a-7b7b6ebf17bc@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115142914.22527-1-m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Max, thanks for the patch!
LGTM
On 1/15/24 17:29, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Reported by Elias Oelschner. Analyzed by XmiliaH.
>
> (cherry-picked from commit 3ee3c9cfa988339f1bf3068530515e2a6fb179d2)
>
> During the recording of `__concat` methametod, the `rec_mm_arith`
> function overrides stack slots that are not restored for GC64
> mode later after the call. This leads to a segmentation fault
> later on. This patch fixes the issue by accounting for those
> additional slots in the array that is used to restore stack
> values.
>
> Maxim Kokryashkin:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9145
> ---
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/lj-839-concat-recording
> PR: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/pull/9597
> Issues: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/9145
> https://github.com/luajit/luajit/issues/839
>
> src/lj_record.c | 2 +-
> .../lj-839-concat-recording.test.lua | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-839-concat-recording.test.lua
>
> diff --git a/src/lj_record.c b/src/lj_record.c
> index a929b8aa..59549b03 100644
> --- a/src/lj_record.c
> +++ b/src/lj_record.c
> @@ -1932,7 +1932,7 @@ static TRef rec_tnew(jit_State *J, uint32_t ah)
> static TRef rec_cat(jit_State *J, BCReg baseslot, BCReg topslot)
> {
> TRef *top = &J->base[topslot];
> - TValue savetv[5];
> + TValue savetv[5+LJ_FR2];
> BCReg s;
> RecordIndex ix;
> lj_assertJ(baseslot < topslot, "bad CAT arg");
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-839-concat-recording.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-839-concat-recording.test.lua
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..9ec0ed96
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-839-concat-recording.test.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +local tap = require('tap')
> +local test = tap.test('lj-839-concat-recording'):skipcond({
> + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> +})
> +test:plan(1)
> +
> +-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT overriding stack slots without
> +-- restoration during the recording of the concat metamethod.
> +-- See also: https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/839.
> +
> +-- Setup value with the `__concat` metamethod.
> +local v1 = setmetatable({}, {
> + __concat = function() return "" end,
> +});
> +
> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1')
> +local result
> +for _ = 1, 4 do
> + result = v1 .. "" .. v1 .. ""
> +end
> +
> +-- There should be an empty string in case of success.
> +-- Failure results in a segmentation fault.
> +-- The issue is GC64-specific, yet it is still being tested for
> +-- other builds.
> +test:is(result, '', 'correct stack restoration')
> +test:done(true)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 14:29 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-15 15:39 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-16 9:46 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-03-11 12:30 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-03-12 7:43 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-03-12 12:05 ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-03-20 15:08 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cd5bacd-99e0-4227-b15a-7b7b6ebf17bc@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix recording of __concat metamethod.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox