From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: Roman Khabibov <roman.habibov@tarantool.org>,
tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] sql: use unify pattern for column names
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:14:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83e93b75-de08-865d-a8c2-9e899e27cc09@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6B917D0D-6B5F-4CC3-A7ED-43B0768B2537@tarantool.org>
Hi! Thanks for the patch!
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/romanhabibov/gh-3962-column
> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3962
Yeah, you added the links afterwards, but still you missed the
changelog again. I once again ask you to create a document with
pre-check actions to do before you send anything.
>> 03/03/2020, 23:13> Also you seem to be very consistent with forgetting to put issue
>> and branch links to your patchsets. Please, create a text document
>> with a list of things to check before sending a patch (issue and
>> branch links, changelog, check that the branch is pushed, etc),
>> save it somewhere, and look at it before a send. I have such
>> document, and it helps sometimes.
See 8 comments below.
> sql: use unify pattern for column names
>
> Name resulting columns generated by an expression or <VALUES>
> construction by the "_COLUMN_N" pattern.
1. I would use 'COLUMN_N', without leading '_', which usually
means something internal, not intended for being used by users.
But even better option - ask Nikita.
> Closes #3962
>
> @TarantoolBot document
> Title: Column naming in SQL
>
> Now, every auto generated column is named by the "_COLUMN_N"
> pattern, where N is the number of column in a query. Auto
2. Starting from what? 0, 1?
> generated column is a column in a query result generated by an
> expression or a column from <VALUES> construction.
3. Better provide examples. Peter may be in the context, and
would probably extend the description by himself, but the issue
may be taken by a different technical writer. Be more
descriptive.
> diff --git a/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h b/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
> index 1579cc92e..8c9708cf6 100644
> --- a/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
> +++ b/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
> @@ -4513,4 +4513,17 @@ int
> sql_fieldno_by_name(struct Parse *parse_context, struct Expr *field_name,
> uint32_t *fieldno);
>
> +/**
> + * Return a string of the form "_COLUMN_N", where N is @a number.
> + *
> + * @param number Number of column.
> + *
> + * @retval string success.
4. Yeah, the comment is correct, but too much water, I would
say. These @param and @retval are not obligatory, as I said
sometime earlier. So many details is clearly an overkill for
such a simple function. Better keep it a one-line comment, or
if you feel inspiration - write about why do we change column
names to that template. About the standard being silent on
the topic, about postgre and mariadb behaviour.
> + */
> +static inline char *
> +sql_generate_column_name(uint32_t number)
> +{
> + return (char *) tt_sprintf("_COLUMN_%d", number);
5. Better keep it const to prevent any potential attempts
to change or even free the name memory.
====================
diff --git a/src/box/sql/select.c b/src/box/sql/select.c
index 54b6f83d8..b50f512e7 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/select.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/select.c
@@ -1946,9 +1946,8 @@ sqlColumnsFromExprList(Parse * parse, ExprList * expr_list,
zName = pColExpr->u.zToken;
}
}
- if (zName == NULL)
- zName = sql_generate_column_name(i + 1);
- zName = sqlMPrintf(db, "%s", zName);
+ zName = sqlDbStrDup(db, zName != NULL ?
+ zName : sql_generate_column_name(i + 1));
/* Make sure the column name is unique. If the name is not unique,
* append an integer to the name so that it becomes unique.
diff --git a/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h b/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
index 8c9708cf6..3360ab67e 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
+++ b/src/box/sql/sqlInt.h
@@ -4520,10 +4520,10 @@ sql_fieldno_by_name(struct Parse *parse_context, struct Expr *field_name,
*
* @retval string success.
*/
-static inline char *
+static inline const char *
sql_generate_column_name(uint32_t number)
{
- return (char *) tt_sprintf("_COLUMN_%d", number);
+ return tt_sprintf("_COLUMN_%d", number);
}
#endif /* sqlINT_H */
====================
> diff --git a/test/sql-tap/select6.test.lua b/test/sql-tap/select6.test.lua
> index c9960dc29..e99260505 100755
> --- a/test/sql-tap/select6.test.lua
> +++ b/test/sql-tap/select6.test.lua
> @@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ test:do_execsql_test(
> test:do_execsql_test(
> "select6-1.7",
> [=[
> - SELECT a.y, a."count(*)", "max(x)", "count(*)"
> - FROM (SELECT count(*),y FROM t1 GROUP BY y) AS a,
> - (SELECT max(x),y FROM t1 GROUP BY y) as b
> + SELECT a.y, a.count, max, count
> + FROM (SELECT count(*) AS count, y FROM t1 GROUP BY y) AS a,
> + (SELECT max(x) AS max, y FROM t1 GROUP BY y) as b
6. Don't auto-names work here? Why didn't you use _COLUMN_N
names?
> WHERE a.y=b.y ORDER BY a.y
> ]=], {
> -- <select6-1.7>
> diff --git a/test/sql/gh-3888-values-blob-assert.result b/test/sql/gh-3888-values-blob-assert.result
> index 0a1af28f2..d2e27efd9 100644
> --- a/test/sql/gh-3888-values-blob-assert.result
> +++ b/test/sql/gh-3888-values-blob-assert.result
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +-- test-run result file version 2
> -- sql: assertion fault on VALUES #3888
> --
> -- Make sure that tokens representing values of integer, float,
> @@ -5,79 +6,87 @@
> -- keywords of the same names.
> --
> test_run = require('test_run').new()
> ----
> -...
> + | ---
> + | ...
> engine = test_run:get_cfg('engine')
> ----
> -...
> + | ---
> + | ...
> _ = box.space._session_settings:update('sql_default_engine', {{'=', 2, engine}})
> ----
7. These and similar changes look unrelated to the
issue. In some other files too.
> -...
> + | ---
> + | ...
> +
8. There should be a test specifically for the issue. Labeled
with its number, with a comment, and with the tests from the
initial Peter's comment. Add them, please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-12 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 15:02 Roman Khabibov
2020-03-09 15:04 ` Roman Khabibov
2020-03-12 0:14 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-03-12 15:04 ` Nikita Pettik
2020-03-31 21:05 ` Roman Khabibov
2020-04-21 23:37 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-04-26 23:08 ` Roman Khabibov
2020-05-01 19:35 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-16 10:14 Roman Khabibov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83e93b75-de08-865d-a8c2-9e899e27cc09@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=roman.habibov@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] sql: use unify pattern for column names' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox