From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>, Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop(). Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:32:23 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <8178af4b-fa35-44c2-b3fd-6e563eb660d5@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240826123740.12759-1-skaplun@tarantool.org> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4144 bytes --] Hi, Sergey, thanks for tha patch! LGTM with a minor comment below. On 26.08.2024 15:37, Sergey Kaplun wrote: > From: Mike Pall <mike> > > Thanks to Sergey Kaplun. > > (cherry picked from commit e45fd4cb713b610506213692f3b55a1869febb03) > > `narrow_conv_backprop()` misses the stack pointer (`nc->sp`) limit check > after a bunch of recursive calls that may change its value. As a result, > it leads to stack-buffer-overflow during the instruction narrowing. This > patch adds a missing check. > > Sergey Kaplun: > * added the description and the test for the problem > > Part of tarantool/tarantool#10199 > --- > > Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop > Related issues: > *https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/10199 > *https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1262 > > src/lj_opt_narrow.c | 3 +- > ...62-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop.test.lua | 61 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop.test.lua > > diff --git a/src/lj_opt_narrow.c b/src/lj_opt_narrow.c > index db0da10f..6b6f20d3 100644 > --- a/src/lj_opt_narrow.c > +++ b/src/lj_opt_narrow.c > @@ -341,7 +341,8 @@ static int narrow_conv_backprop(NarrowConv *nc, IRRef ref, int depth) > NarrowIns *savesp = nc->sp; > int count = narrow_conv_backprop(nc, ir->op1, depth); > count += narrow_conv_backprop(nc, ir->op2, depth); > - if (count <= 1) { /* Limit total number of conversions. */ > + /* Limit total number of conversions. */ > + if (count <= 1 && nc->sp < nc->maxsp) { > *nc->sp++ = NARROWINS(IRT(ir->o, nc->t), ref); > return count; > } > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop.test.lua > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..6bb4025d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop.test.lua > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ > +local tap = require('tap') > + > +-- Test file to demonstrate stack-buffer-overflow during the > +-- narrowing optimization. > +-- See also:https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1262. > + > +local test = tap.test('lj-1262-fix-limit-narrow-conv-backprop'):skipcond({ > + ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(), > +}) > + > +test:plan(1) > + > +-- XXX: Test fails only under ASAN. > +-- XXX: The original reproducer was found by fuzzer: > +--https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=70779. > +-- It creates a long side trace with a huge amount of ADD IRs, > +-- which are recursively used in the `narrow_conv_backprop()` many > +-- enough times to catch the stack-buffer-overflow. I can't > +-- simplify the reproducer any more (or write it from scratch), so > +-- I leave it in that state. > + I would remove a sentence "I can't simplify the reproducer ..." from the test, because it is useful information on review and I think it is useless for those who will use the test. Feel free to ignore and leave as is. s/any more/anymore/ > +local DEFAULT_NUMBER = 1 > +local tonumber = tonumber > + > +local always_number = function(val) > + return tonumber(val) or DEFAULT_NUMBER > +end > + > +local add = function(v1, v2) > + return always_number(v1) + always_number(v2) > +end > + > +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1', 'hotexit=1') > + > +local counter_0 = 0 > +local counter_1 = 0 > +local counter_2 = 0 > +local tmp = add(nil, 'Name') > +local Name0 = add(tmp, 'Name') > +-- Start a long side trace here. > +for _ = 0, 0, 0 do > + if counter_0 > 5 then break end > + counter_0 = counter_0 + 1 > + > + for _ = always_number(false), 1, always_number(Name0) do > + if counter_1 > 5 then break end > + counter_1 = counter_1 + 1 > + > + repeat > + if counter_2 > 5 then break end > + counter_2 = counter_2 + 1 > + > + Name0 = Name0 + Name0 + Name0 > + Name0 = add(Name0, nil) + Name0 > + until nil > + end > +end > + > +test:ok(true, 'no stack-buffer-overflow during narrowing') > + > +test:done(true) [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5192 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-17 10:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-08-26 12:37 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches 2024-09-17 10:32 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2024-09-17 12:01 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=8178af4b-fa35-44c2-b3fd-6e563eb660d5@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] Fix limit check in narrow_conv_backprop().' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox