From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:55:46 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <6DC565F1-23AA-49CA-BB2C-AA60EE9E3593@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <babeb4a1-0859-15d4-4d30-646b0de2b045@tarantool.org> >> <search condition> is a predicate used as a part of WHERE and >> JOIN clauses. ANSI SQL states that <search condition> must >> accept only boolean arguments. In our SQL it is implemented as >> bytecode instruction OP_If which in turn carries out logic of >> conditional jump. Since it can be involved in executing other routines >> different from <search condition>, > > 1. Which other routines? What is a valid case of OP_If with non-boolean > value in check? For instance, to verify that register containing LIMIT value is > 0. It is quite hard to track values which come to this opcode, so we can’t be sure that it always accepts booleans. >> we pass to it additional argument >> when generating bytecode for WHERE and JOIN clauses. When VDBE performs >> OP_If and detects such flag, it checks passed argument to be boolean. >> >> Closes #3723 > > 2. In addition, it fixes https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3651, > doesn't it? It does, added label. >> diff --git a/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua b/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua >> index a58dc87c7..374a7d3e4 100755 >> --- a/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua >> +++ b/test/sql-tap/e_delete.test.lua >> @@ -89,15 +89,15 @@ test:do_delete_tests("e_delete-1.1", { >> -- NULL are retained. >> -- >> test:do_delete_tests("e_delete-1.2", { >> - {1, "DELETE FROM t3 WHERE 1 ; SELECT x FROM t3", {}}, >> - {2, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE 0 ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}}, >> - {3, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE 0.0 ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}}, >> + {1, "DELETE FROM t3 WHERE true ; SELECT x FROM t3", {}}, >> + {2, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE false ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}}, >> + {3, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE false ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}}, > > 3. The last two lines are exactly the same. Why not to drop one? Ok, dropped. >> {4, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE NULL ; SELECT x FROM t4", {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}}, >> {5, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE y!='two'; SELECT x FROM t4", {2}}, >> {6, "DELETE FROM t4 WHERE y='two' ; SELECT x FROM t4", {}}, >> {7, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE x=(SELECT max(x) FROM t5);SELECT x FROM t5", {1, 2, 3, 4}}, >> {8, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t4) ;SELECT x FROM t5", {1, 2, 3, 4}}, >> - {9, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t6) ;SELECT x FROM t5", {}}, >> + {9, "DELETE FROM t5 WHERE (SELECT max(x) FROM t6) != 0 ;SELECT x FROM t5", {}}, >> {10, "DELETE FROM t6 WHERE y>'seven' ; SELECT y FROM t6", {"one", "four", "five"}}, >> }) >> >> diff --git a/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua b/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua >> index 970eeeed9..e47b0f43d 100755 >> --- a/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua >> +++ b/test/sql-tap/e_select1.test.lua >> @@ -448,15 +448,15 @@ test:do_select_tests( >> -- true are included from the dataset. >> -- >> local data ={ >> - {"1"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (1) ",t1_cross_t2}, >> - {"2"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0) ",{}}, >> + {"1"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2}, >> + {"2"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (false) ",{}}, >> {"3"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (NULL) ",{}}, >> - {"6"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0.9) ",t1_cross_t2}, >> - {"7"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON ('0.9') ",t1_cross_t2}, >> - {"8"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (0.0) ",{}}, >> + {"6"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2}, >> + {"7"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2}, >> + {"8"," SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN_PATTERN t2 ON (true) ",t1_cross_t2}, > > 4. The same. 3 duplicates. Removed duplicates.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 17:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-04-14 15:03 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/9] Introduce type BOOLEAN in SQL Nikita Pettik 2019-04-14 15:03 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/9] sql: refactor mem_apply_numeric_type() Nikita Pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/9] sql: disallow text values participate in sum() aggregate Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/9] sql: use msgpack types instead of custom ones Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/9] sql: introduce type boolean Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik 2019-04-23 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/9] sql: improve type determination for column meta Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/9] sql: make comparison predicate return boolean Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:54 ` n.pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 7/9] sql: make predicates accept and " Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:55 ` n.pettik 2019-04-14 15:04 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean Nikita Pettik 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:55 ` n.pettik [this message] 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:59 ` n.pettik 2019-04-23 21:06 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 22:01 ` n.pettik [not found] ` <b2a84f129c2343d3da3311469cbb7b20488a21c2.1555252410.git.korablev@tarantool.org> 2019-04-16 14:12 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 8/9] sql: make LIKE predicate return boolean result Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-18 17:55 ` n.pettik 2019-04-22 18:02 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-23 19:58 ` n.pettik 2019-04-24 10:28 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/9] Introduce type BOOLEAN in SQL Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-04-25 8:46 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=6DC565F1-23AA-49CA-BB2C-AA60EE9E3593@tarantool.org \ --to=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 9/9] sql: make <search condition> accept only boolean' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox