Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>,
	Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:41:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63c1afba-1001-289d-57bc-9dc35679ffc7@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120120103.GD875895@grain>


20.11.2020 15:01, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:50:50PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
>>> @@ -4216,6 +4217,7 @@ unregister_replica(struct trigger *trigger, void * /* event */)
>>>    	struct replica *replica = replica_by_uuid(&old_uuid);
>>>    	assert(replica != NULL);
>>>    	replica_clear_id(replica);
>>> +	replication_on_cluster_update();
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>> We usually perform all the work related to replica register/unregister
>> directly in replica_set_id
>> and replica_clear_id.
>>
>> Besides, these are the places where replicaset.registered_count is updated,
>> so it'd be nice to call replication_on_cluster_update from there.
> Sure.
>
>>> --- a/src/box/box.cc
>>> +++ b/src/box/box.cc
>>> @@ -634,14 +634,6 @@ box_check_replication_synchro_quorum(void)
>>>    		 */
>>>    		int value = replication_synchro_quorum;
>>>    		quorum = eval_replication_synchro_quorum(value);
>>> Pass replicaset.registered_count instead of replication_synchro_quorum here.
> Wait, this is bootstrap, replicaset.registered_count is 0 at this moment, no?

Hm, I didn't think of this.

Yes, this is  either bootstrap or reconfiguration.
Well, if we have a max(1, value)  guard nothing bad should happen even if we
pass 0 on bootstrap. The formula will be reevaluated each time
a replica is registered anyway. Even when the node registers itself.

Anyway, passing replication_synchro_quorum as parameter to evaluate quorum
is even more random.


>
>>>    }
>>> +/**
>>> + * Evaluate the new synchro quorum number when replica
>>> + * get registered/unregistered and the quorum depends on
>>> + * their amount via formula in config.
>>> + */
>>> +void
>>> +replication_on_cluster_update(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!replication_synchro_quorum_eval)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Account only registered replicas when evaluating
>>> +	 * quorum number from a fromula present in config.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	int value = replicaset.registered_count - replicaset.anon_count;
>>
>> registered_count stands for 'normal' replica count, so no need to subtract
>> anon_count from it.
> Yeah, thanks!
>
>>> +
>>> +	say_info("replication: evaluated quorum is %d", quorum);
>>
>> quorum -> replication_synchro_quorum
> ok

-- 
Serge Petrenko

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-20 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 19:40 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 0/4] qsync: evaluate replication_synchro_quorum dynamically Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 1/4] cfg: add cfg_isnumber helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20  9:53   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:06   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:01     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 11:39       ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:47         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 3/4] cfg: prepare symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:32   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:34     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 11:56       ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:14         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 14:38   ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-26 14:44     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 16:01       ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-19 19:41 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:50   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:01     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 12:41       ` Serge Petrenko [this message]
2020-11-20 15:00         ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63c1afba-1001-289d-57bc-9dc35679ffc7@tarantool.org \
    --to=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox