Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>,
	Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:01:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120110148.GA875895@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cb79b7d-b2f4-fc42-b707-31e109b0ff69@tarantool.org>

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:06:55PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> 
> IMO it'd be better to name the new function somewhat similar  to
> `box_update_replication_synchro_quorum` and leave it in box.cc
> 
> 
> This way you avoid adding 2 new dependencies to replication.cc
> and leave all the code dealing with reconfiguration at one place.
> 
> Besides, replication.cc already depends on box, so it won't be a problem
> to call update_replication_synchro_quorum there.

Yeah, I don't mind, thanks!

> Load_cfg.lua will say something similar, when replication_synchro_quorum is
> a number:
> 
> ```
> 
>             log.info("set '%s' configuration option to %s", key,
>                 json.encode(val))
> 
> ```
> 
> So this say_info belongs to the trigger you invoke on replica
> register/unregister.

It will say "set ... to n+2/1" while we're printing the evaluated
integer value which is more informative.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-20 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19 19:40 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 0/4] qsync: evaluate replication_synchro_quorum dynamically Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 1/4] cfg: add cfg_isnumber helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20  9:53   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:06   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:01     ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2020-11-20 11:39       ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:47         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 3/4] cfg: prepare symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:32   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:34     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 11:56       ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:14         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 14:38   ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-26 14:44     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 16:01       ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-19 19:41 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:50   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:01     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 12:41       ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 15:00         ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201120110148.GA875895@grain \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox