* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback
@ 2018-10-10 16:39 Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function Georgy Kirichenko
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-10-10 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
Lua frames are now dumped as well as plain C-frames for a
fiber backtrace. The main patch follows two preparation fixes:
- enable backtrace for an active coroutine;
- setup lua state for the main fiber;
Georgy Kirichenko (3):
fiber: do not inline coro unwind function
Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
Show names of Lua functions in backtraces
src/backtrace.cc | 27 ++++++++++++-
src/lua/fiber.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
test/app/fiber.result | 33 ++++++++++++++++
test/app/fiber.test.lua | 12 ++++++
4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/3538
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/compare/g.kirichenko/gh-3538-lua-backtrace
Changes in v2:
- Rebased against the latest 1.10
- Segmentation fault fixed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function
2018-10-10 16:39 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-10-10 16:39 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-25 9:28 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] Show names of Lua functions in backtraces Georgy Kirichenko
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-10-10 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
Call coro_unwcontext via function pointer to protect the
function from inlining.
---
src/backtrace.cc | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backtrace.cc b/src/backtrace.cc
index 2512bc045..66dcc0047 100644
--- a/src/backtrace.cc
+++ b/src/backtrace.cc
@@ -363,12 +363,17 @@ __asm__ volatile(
#endif
}
+typedef void (*coro_unwcontext_indirect_f)(unw_context_t *unw_context,
+ struct coro_context *coro_ctx);
+/* Variable to process coro_unwcontext indirect call to avoid inlining. */
+static volatile coro_unwcontext_indirect_f coro_unwcontext_indirect = coro_unwcontext;
+
void
backtrace_foreach(backtrace_cb cb, coro_context *coro_ctx, void *cb_ctx)
{
unw_cursor_t unw_cur;
unw_context_t unw_ctx;
- coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ coro_unwcontext_indirect(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_ctx);
int frame_no = 0;
unw_word_t sp = 0, old_sp = 0, ip, offset;
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
2018-10-10 16:39 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-10-10 16:39 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] Show names of Lua functions in backtraces Georgy Kirichenko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-10-10 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
Each yielded fiber has a preserved coro state stored in a corresponding
variable however an executing fiber has a volatile state placed in CPU
registers (stack pointer, instruction pointer and non-volatile registers)
and corresponding context-storing variable value is invalid.
For already yielded fiber we have to use a special asm-written handler to make
a temporary switch to the preserved state and capture executing context what
is not needed for executing fiber.
After the patch for the executing fiber NULL is passed to the backtrace
function as coro context and then backtrace function could decide should
it use special context-switching handler or might just use unw_getcontext
from the unwind library.
---
src/backtrace.cc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backtrace.cc b/src/backtrace.cc
index 66dcc0047..51e8b54da 100644
--- a/src/backtrace.cc
+++ b/src/backtrace.cc
@@ -368,12 +368,32 @@ typedef void (*coro_unwcontext_indirect_f)(unw_context_t *unw_context,
/* Variable to process coro_unwcontext indirect call to avoid inlining. */
static volatile coro_unwcontext_indirect_f coro_unwcontext_indirect = coro_unwcontext;
+/*
+ * Call `cb' callback for each `coro_ctx' contained frame or the current
+ * executed coroutine if `coro_ctx' is NULL. A coro_context is a structure
+ * created on each coroutine yield to store execution context so for an on-CPU
+ * coroutine there is no valid coro_context could be defined and NULL is
+ * passed.
+*/
void
backtrace_foreach(backtrace_cb cb, coro_context *coro_ctx, void *cb_ctx)
{
unw_cursor_t unw_cur;
unw_context_t unw_ctx;
- coro_unwcontext_indirect(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ if (coro_ctx == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * Current executing coroutine and simple unw_getcontext
+ * should function.
+ */
+ unw_getcontext(&unw_ctx);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Execution context is stored in the coro_ctx
+ * so use special context-switching handler to
+ * capture an unwind context.
+ */
+ coro_unwcontext_indirect(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ }
unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_ctx);
int frame_no = 0;
unw_word_t sp = 0, old_sp = 0, ip, offset;
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] Show names of Lua functions in backtraces
2018-10-10 16:39 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-10-10 16:39 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-10-10 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
Trace corresponding Lua state as well as normal C stack frames while
fiber backtracing. This might be useful for debugging purposes.
Fixes: #3538
---
src/lua/fiber.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
test/app/fiber.result | 33 ++++++++++++++++
test/app/fiber.test.lua | 12 ++++++
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lua/fiber.c b/src/lua/fiber.c
index 147add89b..428c2f938 100644
--- a/src/lua/fiber.c
+++ b/src/lua/fiber.c
@@ -178,20 +178,79 @@ lbox_fiber_id(struct lua_State *L)
return 1;
}
+/**
+ * Lua fiber traceback context.
+ */
+struct lua_fiber_tb_ctx {
+ /* Lua stack to push values. */
+ struct lua_State *L;
+ /* Lua stack to trace. */
+ struct lua_State *R;
+ /* Current Lua frame. */
+ int lua_frame;
+ /* Count of traced frames (both C and Lua). */
+ int tb_frame;
+};
+
#ifdef ENABLE_BACKTRACE
-static int
-fiber_backtrace_cb(int frameno, void *frameret, const char *func, size_t offset, void *cb_ctx)
+static void
+dump_lua_frame(struct lua_State *L, lua_Debug *ar, int tb_frame, int lua_frame)
{
char buf[512];
- int l = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "#%-2d %p in ", frameno, frameret);
- if (func)
- snprintf(buf + l, sizeof(buf) - l, "%s+%zu", func, offset);
- else
- snprintf(buf + l, sizeof(buf) - l, "?");
- struct lua_State *L = (struct lua_State*)cb_ctx;
- lua_pushnumber(L, frameno + 1);
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "LUA#%-2d %s in %s at line %i",
+ lua_frame + 1,
+ ar->name != NULL ? ar->name : "(unnamed)",
+ ar->source, ar->currentline);
+ lua_pushnumber(L, tb_frame);
lua_pushstring(L, buf);
lua_settable(L, -3);
+}
+
+static int
+fiber_backtrace_cb(int frameno, void *frameret, const char *func, size_t offset, void *cb_ctx)
+{
+ struct lua_fiber_tb_ctx *tb_ctx = (struct lua_fiber_tb_ctx *)cb_ctx;
+ struct lua_State *L = tb_ctx->L;
+ if (strstr(func, "lj_BC_FUNCC") == func) {
+ /* We are in the LUA vm. */
+ lua_Debug ar;
+ while (tb_ctx->R && lua_getstack(tb_ctx->R, tb_ctx->lua_frame, &ar) > 0) {
+ /* Skip all following C-frames. */
+ lua_getinfo(tb_ctx->R, "Sln", &ar);
+ if (*ar.what != 'C')
+ break;
+ if (ar.name != NULL) {
+ /* Dump frame if it is a C built-in call. */
+ tb_ctx->tb_frame++;
+ dump_lua_frame(L, &ar, tb_ctx->tb_frame,
+ tb_ctx->lua_frame);
+ }
+ tb_ctx->lua_frame++;
+ }
+ while (tb_ctx->R && lua_getstack(tb_ctx->R, tb_ctx->lua_frame, &ar) > 0) {
+ /* Trace Lua frame. */
+ lua_getinfo(tb_ctx->R, "Sln", &ar);
+ if (*ar.what == 'C') {
+ break;
+ }
+ tb_ctx->tb_frame++;
+ dump_lua_frame(L, &ar, tb_ctx->tb_frame,
+ tb_ctx->lua_frame);
+ tb_ctx->lua_frame++;
+ }
+ } else {
+ char buf[512];
+ int l = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "#%-2d %p in ",
+ frameno + 1, frameret);
+ if (func)
+ snprintf(buf + l, sizeof(buf) - l, "%s+%zu", func, offset);
+ else
+ snprintf(buf + l, sizeof(buf) - l, "?");
+ tb_ctx->tb_frame++;
+ lua_pushnumber(L, tb_ctx->tb_frame);
+ lua_pushstring(L, buf);
+ lua_settable(L, -3);
+ }
return 0;
}
#endif
@@ -229,10 +288,15 @@ lbox_fiber_statof(struct fiber *f, void *cb_ctx, bool backtrace)
if (backtrace) {
#ifdef ENABLE_BACKTRACE
+ struct lua_fiber_tb_ctx tb_ctx;
+ tb_ctx.L = L;
+ tb_ctx.R = f->storage.lua.stack;
+ tb_ctx.lua_frame = 0;
+ tb_ctx.tb_frame = 0;
lua_pushstring(L, "backtrace");
lua_newtable(L);
- if (f != fiber())
- backtrace_foreach(fiber_backtrace_cb, &f->ctx, L);
+ backtrace_foreach(fiber_backtrace_cb,
+ f != fiber() ? &f->ctx : NULL, &tb_ctx);
lua_settable(L, -3);
#endif /* ENABLE_BACKTRACE */
}
diff --git a/test/app/fiber.result b/test/app/fiber.result
index 77144e661..1a7827fa1 100644
--- a/test/app/fiber.result
+++ b/test/app/fiber.result
@@ -849,6 +849,39 @@ f2:cancel()
f3:cancel()
---
...
+function sf1() loop() end
+---
+...
+function sf2() sf1() end
+---
+...
+function sf3() sf2() end
+---
+...
+f1 = fiber.create(sf3)
+---
+...
+info = fiber.info()
+---
+...
+backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace
+---
+...
+bt_str = table.concat(backtrace, '\n')
+---
+...
+bt_str:find('sf1') ~= nil
+---
+- true
+...
+bt_str:find('loop') ~= nil
+---
+- true
+...
+bt_str:find('sf3') ~= nil
+---
+- true
+...
-- # gh-666: nulls in output
--
getmetatable(fiber.info())
diff --git a/test/app/fiber.test.lua b/test/app/fiber.test.lua
index 98a136090..9df751cc8 100644
--- a/test/app/fiber.test.lua
+++ b/test/app/fiber.test.lua
@@ -334,6 +334,18 @@ f1:cancel()
f2:cancel()
f3:cancel()
+function sf1() loop() end
+function sf2() sf1() end
+function sf3() sf2() end
+f1 = fiber.create(sf3)
+
+info = fiber.info()
+backtrace = info[f1:id()].backtrace
+bt_str = table.concat(backtrace, '\n')
+bt_str:find('sf1') ~= nil
+bt_str:find('loop') ~= nil
+bt_str:find('sf3') ~= nil
+
-- # gh-666: nulls in output
--
getmetatable(fiber.info())
--
2.19.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-10-25 9:28 ` Vladimir Davydov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Davydov @ 2018-10-25 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgy Kirichenko; +Cc: tarantool-patches
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 07:39:24PM +0300, Georgy Kirichenko wrote:
> Call coro_unwcontext via function pointer to protect the
> function from inlining.
> ---
> src/backtrace.cc | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/backtrace.cc b/src/backtrace.cc
> index 2512bc045..66dcc0047 100644
> --- a/src/backtrace.cc
> +++ b/src/backtrace.cc
> @@ -363,12 +363,17 @@ __asm__ volatile(
> #endif
> }
>
> +typedef void (*coro_unwcontext_indirect_f)(unw_context_t *unw_context,
> + struct coro_context *coro_ctx);
> +/* Variable to process coro_unwcontext indirect call to avoid inlining. */
> +static volatile coro_unwcontext_indirect_f coro_unwcontext_indirect = coro_unwcontext;
> +
Why must not it be inlined? I think it deserves an explanation in
the comment.
Also, may be we'd better use NOINLINE attribute instead of function
pointer?
> void
> backtrace_foreach(backtrace_cb cb, coro_context *coro_ctx, void *cb_ctx)
> {
> unw_cursor_t unw_cur;
> unw_context_t unw_ctx;
> - coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
> + coro_unwcontext_indirect(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
> unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_ctx);
> int frame_no = 0;
> unw_word_t sp = 0, old_sp = 0, ip, offset;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
2018-10-04 7:44 ` [tarantool-patches] " Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-10-05 15:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Davydov @ 2018-10-05 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Georgy Kirichenko; +Cc: tarantool-patches
The patch looks good, but unfortunately it leads to box/access.test.lua
crash when tarantool is built in release mode. I've no idea why this
could happen. Please investigate.
https://travis-ci.org/tarantool/tarantool/jobs/436995648
box/admin.test.lua
[Instance "box" killed by signal: 6 (SIGABRT)]
Segmentation fault
code: SEGV_MAPERR
addr: 0xffffffffffff8750
context: 0x7fffe94ef7c0
siginfo: 0x7fffe94ef8f0
rax 0x4fd4a0 5231776
rbx 0x7fffe94ff610 140737107719696
rcx 0x7fffe9400d70 140737106677104
rdx 0x40153748 1075132232
rsi 0x7fffe94ff610 140737107719696
rdi 0xffffffffffff8708 -30968
rsp 0x7fffe94efd70 140737107656048
rbp 0x7fffe94efd88 140737107656072
r8 0x400003b8 1073742776
r9 0x98 152
r10 0x7fffe94ef7e0 140737107654624
r11 0x7ffff4238a3b 140737289357883
r12 0x1d 29
r13 0xf 15
r14 0x40001000 1073745920
r15 0x4ea7d0 5154768
rip 0x7ffff4238a3b 140737289357883
eflags 0x10212 66066
cs 0x33 51
gs 0x0 0
fs 0x0 0
cr2 0xffffffffffff8750 -30896
err 0x7 7
oldmask 0x0 0
trapno 0xe 14
Current time: 1538752048
Please file a bug at http://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues
Attempting backtrace... Note: since the server has already crashed,
this may fail as well
#0 0x4fe559 in print_backtrace+9
#1 0x412d0d in _ZL12sig_fatal_cbiP9siginfo_tPv+bd
#2 0x7ffff48936d0 in _L_unlock_13+34
#3 0x7ffff4238a3b in _Ux86_64_getcontext+0
#4 0x4fd4b1 in _ZL16unw_getcontext_fP8ucontextPv+11
#5 0x4fe3b6 in backtrace_foreach+66
#6 0x5077f0 in coio_wait+80
#7 0x4ea86f in lbox_socket_iowait+9f
#8 0x518767 in lj_BC_FUNCC+34
#9 0x529662 in lua_pcall+32
#10 0x4e9fa3 in luaT_call+13
#11 0x4e4976 in lua_fiber_run_f+56
#12 0x41270c in _ZL16fiber_cxx_invokePFiP13__va_list_tagES0_+c
#13 0x4fb210 in fiber_loop+30
#14 0x63ae7f in coro_init+3f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
2018-09-26 17:36 ` Konstantin Osipov
@ 2018-10-04 7:44 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-05 15:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-10-04 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
Each yielded fiber has a preserved coro state stored in a corresponding
variable however an executing fiber has a volatile state placed in CPU
registers (stack pointer, instruction pointer and non-volatile registers)
and corresponding context-storing variable value is invalid.
For already yielded fiber we have to use a special asm-written handler to make
a temporary switch to the preserved state and capture executing context what
is not needed for executing fiber.
After the patch for the executing fiber NULL is passed to the backtrace
function as coro context and then backtrace function could decide should
it use special context-switching handler or might just use unw_getcontext
from the unwind library.
---
src/backtrace.cc | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backtrace.cc b/src/backtrace.cc
index 2512bc045..d59fd5879 100644
--- a/src/backtrace.cc
+++ b/src/backtrace.cc
@@ -363,12 +363,32 @@ __asm__ volatile(
#endif
}
+/*
+ * Call `cb' callback for each `coro_ctx' contained frame or the current
+ * executed coroutine if `coro_ctx' is NULL. A coro_context is a structure
+ * created on each coroutine yield to store execution context so for an on-CPU
+ * coroutine there is no valid coro_context could be defined and NULL is
+ * passed.
+*/
void
backtrace_foreach(backtrace_cb cb, coro_context *coro_ctx, void *cb_ctx)
{
unw_cursor_t unw_cur;
unw_context_t unw_ctx;
- coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ if (coro_ctx == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * Current executing coroutine and simple unw_getcontext
+ * should function.
+ */
+ unw_getcontext(&unw_ctx);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Execution context is stored in the coro_ctx
+ * so use special context-switching handler to
+ * capture an unwind context.
+ */
+ coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ }
unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_ctx);
int frame_no = 0;
unw_word_t sp = 0, old_sp = 0, ip, offset;
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber
2018-09-21 13:20 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
@ 2018-09-21 13:20 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-25 23:34 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Georgy Kirichenko @ 2018-09-21 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tarantool-patches; +Cc: Georgy Kirichenko
A fiber's coro context stores execution state for a corresponding
already yielded fiber. If fiber is on the execution then it hasn't
valid stored coro state and might be backtraced without a special unwind
context builder.
---
src/backtrace.cc | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backtrace.cc b/src/backtrace.cc
index 2512bc045..70ed913e0 100644
--- a/src/backtrace.cc
+++ b/src/backtrace.cc
@@ -368,7 +368,10 @@ backtrace_foreach(backtrace_cb cb, coro_context *coro_ctx, void *cb_ctx)
{
unw_cursor_t unw_cur;
unw_context_t unw_ctx;
- coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ if (coro_ctx != NULL)
+ coro_unwcontext(&unw_ctx, coro_ctx);
+ else
+ unw_getcontext(&unw_ctx);
unw_init_local(&unw_cur, &unw_ctx);
int frame_no = 0;
unw_word_t sp = 0, old_sp = 0, ip, offset;
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-25 9:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-10 16:39 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/3] fiber: do not inline coro unwind function Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-25 9:28 ` Vladimir Davydov
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-10 16:39 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/3] Show names of Lua functions in backtraces Georgy Kirichenko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-09-21 13:20 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/3] Dump lua frames for a fiber traceback Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-21 13:20 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/3] Proper unwind for currently executing fiber Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-25 23:34 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-09-26 6:57 ` Georgy Kirichenko
2018-09-26 17:36 ` Konstantin Osipov
2018-10-04 7:44 ` [tarantool-patches] " Georgy Kirichenko
2018-10-05 15:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox