From: Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>, tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction's first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:20:58 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <6273f141-4455-c017-8542-65c50360cb95@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210607155519.109626-2-gorcunov@gmail.com> Thanks for the patch! > diff --git a/src/box/applier.cc b/src/box/applier.cc > index 33181fdbf..38695a54f 100644 > --- a/src/box/applier.cc > +++ b/src/box/applier.cc> @@ -751,11 +764,35 @@ applier_txn_rollback_cb(struct trigger *trigger, void *event) > return 0; > } > > +struct replica_cb_data { > + /** Replica ID the data belongs to. */ > + uint32_t replica_id; > + /** > + * Timestamp of a transaction to be accounted > + * for relay lag. Usually it is a first row in > + * a transaction. > + */ > + double txn_start_tm; > +}; > + > +/** Update replica associated data once write is complete. */ > +static void > +replica_txn_wal_write_cb(struct replica_cb_data *rcb) > +{ > + struct replica *r = replica_by_id(rcb->replica_id); > + if (likely(r != NULL)) > + r->applier_txn_start_tm = rcb->txn_start_tm; I spent some time trying to understand why did you delete the check that we should not override the timestamp until its ACK is sent. But then I realized that indeed the correct way is to send the latest timestamp of a tx batch, not the first one. Because the replica confirms receipt of the transactions up to the latest one. I am 90% sure it is correct. And you need to add a comment here why do you use the latest timestamp. Also that means you need to use the last row's timestamp, not the first row's one. By the same reason. I doubt they are different, but still it would be more correct. In apply_plain_tx() below you should use last stailq entry, not first entry. > @@ -931,10 +978,21 @@ apply_plain_tx(struct stailq *rows, bool skip_conflict, bool use_triggers) > goto fail; > } > > + struct replica_cb_data *rcb; > + rcb = region_alloc_object(&txn->region, typeof(*rcb), &size); > + if (rcb == NULL) { > + diag_set(OutOfMemory, size, "region_alloc_object", "rcb"); > + goto fail; > + } > + > trigger_create(on_rollback, applier_txn_rollback_cb, NULL, NULL); > txn_on_rollback(txn, on_rollback); > > - trigger_create(on_wal_write, applier_txn_wal_write_cb, NULL, NULL); > + item = stailq_first_entry(rows, struct applier_tx_row, next); > + rcb->replica_id = replica_id; > + rcb->txn_start_tm = item->row.tm; > + > + trigger_create(on_wal_write, applier_txn_wal_write_cb, rcb, NULL); > txn_on_wal_write(txn, on_wal_write); > }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 19:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-07 15:55 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] relay: provide downstream lag information Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction's first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 19:20 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches [this message] 2021-06-15 9:36 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-16 13:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-17 9:16 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 2/2] relay: provide information about downstream lag Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 19:21 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-08 8:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-08 9:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-08 18:15 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-15 10:03 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-17 6:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-17 9:01 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-17 9:58 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 19:20 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 0/2] relay: provide downstream lag information Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches 2021-06-07 20:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=6273f141-4455-c017-8542-65c50360cb95@tarantool.org \ --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v8 1/2] applier: send transaction'\''s first row WAL time in the applier_writer_f' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox