From: Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, gorcunov@gmail.com
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3.5/7] applier: fix not releasing the latch on apply_synchro_row() fail
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:30:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6f77b1-5407-f0c9-e600-fef52862c0b4@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b27076fa5d648a7bb40041dc3976ad1e63cdfb0c.1616588119.git.sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
Once apply_synchro_row() failed, applier_apply_tx() would simply raise
an error without unlocking replica latch. This lead to all the appliers
hanging indefinitely on trying to lock the latch for this replica.
In scope of #5566
---
src/box/applier.cc | 4 +-
test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.result | 130 ++++++++++++++++++
.../replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua | 57 ++++++++
test/replication/suite.cfg | 1 +
test/replication/suite.ini | 2 +-
5 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.result
create mode 100644 test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua
diff --git a/src/box/applier.cc b/src/box/applier.cc
index e6d9673dd..41abe64f9 100644
--- a/src/box/applier.cc
+++ b/src/box/applier.cc
@@ -1055,8 +1055,8 @@ applier_apply_tx(struct applier *applier, struct
stailq *rows)
* each other.
*/
assert(first_row == last_row);
- if (apply_synchro_row(first_row) != 0)
- diag_raise();
+ if ((rc = apply_synchro_row(first_row)) != 0)
+ goto finish;
} else if ((rc = apply_plain_tx(rows, replication_skip_conflict,
true)) != 0) {
goto finish;
diff --git a/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.result
b/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.result
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9f6fac00b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.result
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+-- test-run result file version 2
+test_run = require('test_run').new()
+ | ---
+ | ...
+fiber = require('fiber')
+ | ---
+ | ...
+--
+-- All appliers could hang after failing to apply a synchronous
message: either
+-- CONFIRM or ROLLBACK.
+--
+box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'replication')
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+_ = box.schema.space.create('sync', {is_sync=true})
+ | ---
+ | ...
+_ = box.space.sync:create_index('pk')
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+old_synchro_quorum = box.cfg.replication_synchro_quorum
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum=3}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+-- A huge timeout so that we can perform some actions on a replica before
+-- writing ROLLBACK.
+old_synchro_timeout = box.cfg.replication_synchro_timeout
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_timeout=1000}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+test_run:cmd('create server replica with rpl_master=default,\
+ script="replication/replica.lua"')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+test_run:cmd('start server replica')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+
+_ = fiber.new(box.space.sync.insert, box.space.sync, {1})
+ | ---
+ | ...
+test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default')
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+test_run:switch('replica')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+
+box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_WAL_IO', true)
+ | ---
+ | - ok
+ | ...
+
+test_run:switch('default')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_timeout=0.01}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+test_run:switch('replica')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+
+test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='stopped',\
+ message_re='Failed to write to disk'})
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_WAL_IO', false)
+ | ---
+ | - ok
+ | ...
+
+-- Applier is killed due to a failed WAL write, so restart replication to
+-- check whether it hangs or not. Actually this single applier would
fail an
+-- assertion rather than hang, but all the other appliers, if any,
would hang.
+old_repl = box.cfg.replication
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.cfg{replication=""}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.cfg{replication=old_repl}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
+test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='follow'})
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+
+-- Cleanup.
+test_run:switch('default')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+test_run:cmd('stop server replica')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+test_run:cmd('delete server replica')
+ | ---
+ | - true
+ | ...
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum=old_synchro_quorum,\
+ replication_synchro_timeout=old_synchro_timeout}
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.space.sync:drop()
+ | ---
+ | ...
+box.schema.user.revoke('guest', 'replication')
+ | ---
+ | ...
+
diff --git a/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua
b/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6c3b09fab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/replication/hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+test_run = require('test_run').new()
+fiber = require('fiber')
+--
+-- All appliers could hang after failing to apply a synchronous
message: either
+-- CONFIRM or ROLLBACK.
+--
+box.schema.user.grant('guest', 'replication')
+
+_ = box.schema.space.create('sync', {is_sync=true})
+_ = box.space.sync:create_index('pk')
+
+old_synchro_quorum = box.cfg.replication_synchro_quorum
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum=3}
+-- A huge timeout so that we can perform some actions on a replica before
+-- writing ROLLBACK.
+old_synchro_timeout = box.cfg.replication_synchro_timeout
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_timeout=1000}
+
+test_run:cmd('create server replica with rpl_master=default,\
+ script="replication/replica.lua"')
+test_run:cmd('start server replica')
+
+_ = fiber.new(box.space.sync.insert, box.space.sync, {1})
+test_run:wait_lsn('replica', 'default')
+
+test_run:switch('replica')
+
+box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_WAL_IO', true)
+
+test_run:switch('default')
+
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_timeout=0.01}
+
+test_run:switch('replica')
+
+test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='stopped',\
+ message_re='Failed to write to disk'})
+box.error.injection.set('ERRINJ_WAL_IO', false)
+
+-- Applier is killed due to a failed WAL write, so restart replication to
+-- check whether it hangs or not. Actually this single applier would
fail an
+-- assertion rather than hang, but all the other appliers, if any,
would hang.
+old_repl = box.cfg.replication
+box.cfg{replication=""}
+box.cfg{replication=old_repl}
+
+test_run:wait_upstream(1, {status='follow'})
+
+-- Cleanup.
+test_run:switch('default')
+test_run:cmd('stop server replica')
+test_run:cmd('delete server replica')
+box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum=old_synchro_quorum,\
+ replication_synchro_timeout=old_synchro_timeout}
+box.space.sync:drop()
+box.schema.user.revoke('guest', 'replication')
+
diff --git a/test/replication/suite.cfg b/test/replication/suite.cfg
index 7e7004592..c1c329438 100644
--- a/test/replication/suite.cfg
+++ b/test/replication/suite.cfg
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
"status.test.lua": {},
"wal_off.test.lua": {},
"hot_standby.test.lua": {},
+ "hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua": {},
"rebootstrap.test.lua": {},
"wal_rw_stress.test.lua": {},
"force_recovery.test.lua": {},
diff --git a/test/replication/suite.ini b/test/replication/suite.ini
index dcd711a2a..fc161700a 100644
--- a/test/replication/suite.ini
+++ b/test/replication/suite.ini
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ core = tarantool
script = master.lua
description = tarantool/box, replication
disabled = consistent.test.lua
-release_disabled = catch.test.lua errinj.test.lua gc.test.lua
gc_no_space.test.lua before_replace.test.lua qsync_advanced.test.lua
qsync_errinj.test.lua quorum.test.lua recover_missing_xlog.test.lua
sync.test.lua long_row_timeout.test.lua gh-4739-vclock-assert.test.lua
gh-4730-applier-rollback.test.lua gh-5140-qsync-casc-rollback.test.lua
gh-5144-qsync-dup-confirm.test.lua gh-5167-qsync-rollback-snap.test.lua
gh-5506-election-on-off.test.lua gh-5536-wal-limit.test.lua
+release_disabled = catch.test.lua errinj.test.lua gc.test.lua
gc_no_space.test.lua before_replace.test.lua qsync_advanced.test.lua
qsync_errinj.test.lua quorum.test.lua recover_missing_xlog.test.lua
sync.test.lua long_row_timeout.test.lua gh-4739-vclock-assert.test.lua
gh-4730-applier-rollback.test.lua gh-5140-qsync-casc-rollback.test.lua
gh-5144-qsync-dup-confirm.test.lua gh-5167-qsync-rollback-snap.test.lua
gh-5506-election-on-off.test.lua gh-5536-wal-limit.test.lua
hang_on_synchro_fail.test.lua
config = suite.cfg
lua_libs = lua/fast_replica.lua lua/rlimit.lua
use_unix_sockets = True
--
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-27 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 12:24 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/7] applier: handle synchronous transactions during final Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/7] replication: fix a hang on final join retry Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:44 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 16:52 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 21:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 2/7] applier: extract tx boundary checks from applier_read_tx into a separate routine Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 12:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 16:54 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/7] applier: extract plain tx application from applier_apply_tx() Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:47 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 17:34 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 18:30 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-03-29 21:50 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3.5/7] applier: fix not releasing the latch on apply_synchro_row() fail Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-30 8:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 4/7] applier: remove excess last_row_time update from subscribe loop Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 5/7] applier: make final join transactional Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:49 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 19:05 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 21:51 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-30 8:15 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 6/7] replication: tolerate synchro rollback during final join Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:45 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:49 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 19:23 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-24 12:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 7/7] replication: do not ignore replica vclock on register Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 20:50 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-27 20:13 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-29 21:51 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-30 8:16 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-30 12:33 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-26 13:46 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/7] applier: handle synchronous transactions during final Cyrill Gorcunov via Tarantool-patches
2021-03-30 20:13 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-05 16:15 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c6f77b1-5407-f0c9-e600-fef52862c0b4@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3.5/7] applier: fix not releasing the latch on apply_synchro_row() fail' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox