From: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, Kostya Osipov <kostja@tarantool.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] box: introduce offset slot cache in key_part Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:15:22 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5c111ccd-d2d6-1d67-187c-b6fb5be9cfa6@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20181101133222.GB30032@chai> > I don't understand this comment. Could you please rephrase? > I don't understand this statement either. Could you give an > example? > Did you consider storing it elsewhere, e.g. in some kind of > index search context? Tuned tuple_field_by_part_raw routine with key_part's offset_slot_cache. Introduced tuple_format epoch to test validity of this cache. The key_part caches last offset_slot source format to make epoch comparison because same space may have multiple format of same epoch that have different key_parts and related offset_slots distribution. >> - alter->new_space = space_new_xc(alter->space_def, &alter->key_list); >> + alter->new_space = >> + space_new_xc(alter->space_def, &alter->key_list, >> + alter->old_space->format != NULL ? >> + alter->old_space->format->epoch + 1 : 1); > > Can't we make it simpler and simply increase epoch id every > time we create a new space? This is only an optimization, > by leaking it into alter.cc you are making alter worry about > stuff which should not be its concern.> Passing epoch id around explicitly is ugly. The main problem we faced is that there are two formats in vinyl - regular and disk format. Alter.cc does not know anything about the internal structure of the vinyl space object, so he cannot update the disk epoch on his own. > Why can't you do it in key_def_set_part? > Lack of code reuse, abstraction leak. Like this for now: key_def_set_part(new_def, pos++, part->fieldno, part->type, part->nullable_action, part->coll, part->coll_id, part->sort_order, part->path, part->path_len, part->offset_slot_cache, part->format_cache); > The source format to check that offset_slot_epoch is not stale. > > Please avoid using the word "actuality". "hit"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 12:15 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-10-29 6:56 [PATCH v5 00/12] box: indexes by JSON path Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] box: refactor key_def_find routine Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-19 17:48 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] box: tune tuple_field_raw_by_path for indexed data Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] box: introduce offset slot cache in key_part Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 13:32 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-06 12:15 ` Kirill Shcherbatov [this message] 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] box: specify indexes in user-friendly form Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 13:34 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 14:18 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-06 12:15 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] box: introduce key_def_parts_are_sequential Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 14:23 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-06 12:14 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-19 17:48 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] box: introduce tuple_field_go_to_path Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-19 17:48 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] box: introduce tuple_format_add_key_part Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 14:38 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-06 12:15 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-19 17:50 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] lib: implement JSON tree class for json library Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 15:08 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-06 12:15 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-19 17:53 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-11-20 16:43 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-11-21 10:37 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-26 10:50 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] box: manage format fields with JSON tree class Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] lib: introduce json_path_normalize routine Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-01 15:22 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-11-01 15:27 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-20 15:13 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-11-26 10:50 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-20 15:14 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] box: introduce JSON indexes Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-11-20 16:52 ` Vladimir Davydov 2018-11-26 10:50 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-10-29 6:56 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v5 09/12] box: introduce has_json_paths flag in templates Kirill Shcherbatov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5c111ccd-d2d6-1d67-187c-b6fb5be9cfa6@tarantool.org \ --to=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \ --cc=kostja@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] box: introduce offset slot cache in key_part' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox