Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: imeevma@tarantool.org, tsafin@tarantool.org
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 10/10] sql: refactor sql/func.c
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:31:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a52e9c-c405-55e2-55a5-22bac51471e5@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <847d1f4dd9b5b582f178e23361bbb746d2f12c04.1597417321.git.imeevma@gmail.com>

Thanks for the patch!

See 3 comments below.

On 14.08.2020 17:05, imeevma@tarantool.org wrote:
> After changing the way of checking the types of arguments, some of the
> code in sql/func.c is no longer used. This patch removes this code.
> 
> Follow-up of #4159
> ---
>  src/box/sql/func.c | 841 +++++----------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 754 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/box/sql/func.c b/src/box/sql/func.c
> index c289f2de0..de1e4d13d 100644
> --- a/src/box/sql/func.c
> +++ b/src/box/sql/func.c

1. Why didn't you simplify some funtions?

- lengthFunc(). Is it allowed to pass numbers into it legally?
  Perhaps it is, I just don't remember.

- position_func(). It has a some complicated check of argument
  types. I think now you can make it a bit simpler.

- lower/upper(). They still check for non-blob argument.

- like(). Also still checks for non-str types.

> @@ -504,44 +504,21 @@ absFunc(sql_context * context, int argc, sql_value ** argv)
>  {
>  	assert(argc == 1);
>  	UNUSED_PARAMETER(argc);
> -	switch (sql_value_type(argv[0])) {
> -	case MP_UINT: {
> -		sql_result_uint(context, sql_value_uint64(argv[0]));
> -		break;
> -	}
> -	case MP_INT: {
> +	enum mp_type type = sql_value_type(argv[0]);
> +	if (type == MP_NIL)
> +		return sql_result_null(context);
> +	if (type == MP_UINT)
> +		return sql_result_uint(context, sql_value_uint64(argv[0]));
> +	if (type == MP_INT) {

2. Would look better as a switch.

>  		int64_t value = sql_value_int64(argv[0]);
>  		assert(value < 0);
> -		sql_result_uint(context, -value);
> -		break;
> -	}
> @@ -2229,703 +2189,76 @@ static struct {
>  	uint16_t flags;
>  	void (*call)(sql_context *ctx, int argc, sql_value **argv);
>  	void (*finalize)(sql_context *ctx);
> -	/** Members below are related to struct func_def. */
> -	bool is_deterministic;
> -	int param_count;
> -	enum field_type returns;
> -	enum func_aggregate aggregate;
> -	bool export_to_sql;
>  } sql_builtins[] = {
> -	{.name = "ABS",
> -	 .param_count = 1,
> -	 .returns = FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER,
> -	 .aggregate = FUNC_AGGREGATE_NONE,
> -	 .is_deterministic = true,
> -	 .flags = 0,
> -	 .call = absFunc,
> -	 .finalize = NULL,
> -	 .export_to_sql = true,
> -	}, {

3. These removals I don't like. I think we don't need to expose anything
into _func. All could be done in there instead, and would look simpler,
IMO. As I explained in the previous emails in this thread.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-22 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-14 15:04 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 00/10] sql: properly check arguments types of built-in functions imeevma
2020-08-14 15:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 01/10] sql: do not return UNSIGNED in " imeevma
2020-08-22 14:23   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 02/10] sql: fix functions return types imeevma
2020-08-22 14:24   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 03/10] sql: change signature of trim() imeevma
2020-08-22 14:26   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 04/10] box: add new options for functions imeevma
2020-08-22 14:28   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 05/10] sql: use has_vararg for built-in functions imeevma
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 06/10] sql: add overloaded versions of the functions imeevma
2020-08-22 14:29   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 07/10] sql: move built-in function definitions in _func imeevma
2020-08-22 14:30   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 08/10] box: add param_list to 'struct func' imeevma
2020-08-22 14:30   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 09/10] sql: check built-in functions argument types imeevma
2020-08-14 15:05 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 10/10] sql: refactor sql/func.c imeevma
2020-08-22 14:31   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2020-08-22 14:25 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 00/10] sql: properly check arguments types of built-in functions Vladislav Shpilevoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59a52e9c-c405-55e2-55a5-22bac51471e5@tarantool.org \
    --to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --cc=imeevma@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=tsafin@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 10/10] sql: refactor sql/func.c' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox