From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] sql: restrict nullable action definitions
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:12:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51802451-C9AA-4EB8-8926-D08446738FF1@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33314a00ce2e0602e0a0fa7e30257ff03e3eed16.1531932662.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
> void
> -sqlite3AddNotNull(Parse * pParse, int onError)
> +sql_column_nullable_action_add(struct Parse *parser,
> + enum on_conflict_action nullable_action)
This name sounds really weird.. Why not sql_column_add_nullable_action ?
> {
> - Table *p;
> - p = pParse->pNewTable;
> - if (p == 0 || NEVER(p->def->field_count < 1))
> + struct Table *p = parser->pNewTable;
> + if (p == NULL || NEVER(p->def->field_count < 1))
> return;
> - p->def->fields[p->def->field_count - 1].nullable_action = (u8)onError;
> - p->def->fields[p->def->field_count - 1].is_nullable =
> - action_is_nullable(onError);
> + struct field_def *field = &p->def->fields[p->def->field_count - 1];
> + if (field->nullable_action != on_conflict_action_MAX) {
Why do you need on_conflict_action_MAX when you already have ON_CONFLICT_ACTION_DEFAULT?
Anyway, there is no action DEFAULT, it is sooner or later converted to ABORT.
> + /* Prevent defining nullable_action many times. */
> + const char *err_msg =
> + tt_sprintf("NULL declaration for column '%s' of table "
> + "'%s' has been already set to '%s'",
> + field->name, p->def->name,
> + on_conflict_action_strs[field->
> + nullable_action]);
> + diag_set(ClientError, ER_SQL, err_msg);
> + parser->rc = SQL_TARANTOOL_ERROR;
> + parser->nErr++;
> + return;
> + }
> + field->nullable_action = nullable_action;
> + field->is_nullable = action_is_nullable(nullable_action);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1251,7 +1271,10 @@ convertToWithoutRowidTable(Parse * pParse, Table * pTab)
> if (pTab->iPKey >= 0) {
> ExprList *pList;
> Token ipkToken;
> - sqlite3TokenInit(&ipkToken, pTab->def->fields[pTab->iPKey].name);
> + struct field_def *field = &fields[pTab->iPKey];
Could we avoid using iPKey in this function? We are going to remove it soon.
> + if (field_def_create_for_pk(pParse, field, space_name) != 0)
> + return;
> + sqlite3TokenInit(&ipkToken, field->name);
> pList = sql_expr_list_append(pParse->db, NULL,
> sqlite3ExprAlloc(db, TK_ID,
> &ipkToken, 0));
> index b6d92f7..5ae6b0c 100644
> --- a/test/sql/on-conflict.test.lua
> +++ b/test/sql/on-conflict.test.lua
> @@ -38,3 +38,11 @@ box.sql.execute('DROP TABLE p')
> box.sql.execute('DROP TABLE e')
> box.sql.execute('DROP TABLE t1')
> box.sql.execute('DROP TABLE t2')
> +
> +--
> +-- gh-3473: Primary key can be declared with NULL.
Lets write ‘can’t be declared with NULL’. Otherwise, it seems to be confusing.
> +--
> +box.sql.execute('CREATE TABLE te17 (s1 INT NULL PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL);')
> +box.sql.execute('CREATE TABLE te17 (s1 INT NULL PRIMARY KEY);')
> +box.sql.execute("CREATE TABLE test (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int NULL ON CONFLICT IGNORE);")
> +box.sql.execute("CREATE TABLE test (a int, b int NULL, c int, PRIMARY KEY(a, b, c))")
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 16:52 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 0/3] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 1/3] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-18 20:12 ` n.pettik [this message]
2018-07-19 8:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-20 2:39 ` n.pettik
2018-07-20 7:29 ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-23 8:31 ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-23 16:53 ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-23 19:27 ` n.pettik
2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 2/3] sql: fixed possible leak in sqlite3EndTable Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-18 20:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik
2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 3/3] sql: get rid of Column structure Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-18 20:13 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik
2018-07-19 8:12 ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-19 8:39 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2018-07-19 10:17 ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2018-07-20 2:43 ` n.pettik
2018-07-24 15:26 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] sql: restrict nullable action definitions Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51802451-C9AA-4EB8-8926-D08446738FF1@tarantool.org \
--to=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] sql: restrict nullable action definitions' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox