From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] sql: get rid of Column structure Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:13:00 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4A0B514A-C0DA-406F-BD14-B1F11D4357EF@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <72990d0ecbba60f0551c254eb33a3282b645cd5d.1531932662.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> Again: why did this patch trapped in patch-set? All three patches seem to be independent. > On 18 Jul 2018, at 19:52, Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> wrote: > > Get rid of is_primkey in Column structure as it become Typo: ‘becomes’. > redundant. Moved the last member coll with collation pointer > to field_def structure. Why do you need to move collation ptr to field_def? It already features collation id, so you can always get pointer to it by simple lookup. It would make sense if it was utilised everywhere. But I see assignment only in sqlite3SelectAddColumnTypeAndCollation() and no real usages..Lets remove it at all. > @@ -1692,22 +1680,9 @@ sqlite3EndTable(Parse * pParse, /* Parse context */ > } > } > > - /* Set default on_nullable action if required. */ > - struct field_def *field = p->def->fields; > - for (uint32_t i = 0; i < p->def->field_count; ++i, ++field) { > - if (field->nullable_action == on_conflict_action_MAX) { > - field->nullable_action = ON_CONFLICT_ACTION_NONE; > - field->is_nullable = true; > - } > - } > - > - if (check_on_conflict_replace_entries(p)) { > - sqlite3ErrorMsg(pParse, > - "only PRIMARY KEY constraint can " > - "have ON CONFLICT REPLACE clause " > - "- %s", p->def->name); Here you are simply fixing changes made in first patch, so mb it is better to move them to first patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 20:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-07-18 16:52 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 0/3] sql: restrict nullable action definitions Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 1/3] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-18 20:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik 2018-07-19 8:12 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-20 2:39 ` n.pettik 2018-07-20 7:29 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-23 8:31 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-23 16:53 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-23 19:27 ` n.pettik 2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 2/3] sql: fixed possible leak in sqlite3EndTable Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-18 20:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " n.pettik 2018-07-18 16:52 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v1 3/3] sql: get rid of Column structure Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-18 20:13 ` n.pettik [this message] 2018-07-19 8:12 ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-19 8:39 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2018-07-19 10:17 ` Kirill Shcherbatov 2018-07-20 2:43 ` n.pettik 2018-07-24 15:26 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] sql: restrict nullable action definitions Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4A0B514A-C0DA-406F-BD14-B1F11D4357EF@tarantool.org \ --to=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] sql: get rid of Column structure' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox