Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>,
	Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] Only emit proper parent references in snapshot replay.
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:46:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38004fc1-a985-4cf5-98bd-d207360f753d@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d003159c9a1811d98e30a863cc75c11bab658a3.1706104777.git.skaplun@tarantool.org>

Hi, Sergey

thanks for the patch! test is passed with reverted patch.


cmake -S . -B build -DLUA_USE_ASSERT=ON -DLUA_USE_APICHECK=ON

cmake --builddir  build

cmake --builddir build -t LuaJIT-tests


On 1/24/24 17:11, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> From: Mike Pall <mike>
>
> Thanks to Peter Cawley.
>
> (cherry picked from commit 9bdfd34dccb913777be0efcc6869b6eeb5b9b43b)
>
> Assume we have a trace containing the IR instruction:
> | {sink}  tab TNEW   #32762  #0
>
> `lj_snap_replay()` assumes that 32762 (0x7ffa) (op1 of TNEW) is a
> constant reference. It is passed to the `snap_replay_const()` lookup to
> the IR constant in the 0x7ffa slot. If this slot contains the second
> part of the IR constant number 0.5029296875 (step of the cycle) in its
> raw form (0x3fe0180000000000). The 0x18 part is treated as IROp
> (IR_KGC), and JIT is trying to continue with a store of an invalid GC
> object, which leads to a crash.
>
> This patch checks that only the IRMref IR operand is needed to restore.
>
> Sergey Kaplun:
> * added the description and the test for the problem
>
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#9595
> ---
>   src/lj_snap.c                                 | 12 ++++---
>   .../lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua            | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 test/tarantool-tests/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua
>
> diff --git a/src/lj_snap.c b/src/lj_snap.c
> index 3f0fccec..3eb0cd28 100644
> --- a/src/lj_snap.c
> +++ b/src/lj_snap.c
> @@ -516,13 +516,15 @@ void lj_snap_replay(jit_State *J, GCtrace *T)
>         IRRef refp = snap_ref(sn);
>         IRIns *ir = &T->ir[refp];
>         if (regsp_reg(ir->r) == RID_SUNK) {
> +	uint8_t m;
>   	if (J->slot[snap_slot(sn)] != snap_slot(sn)) continue;
>   	pass23 = 1;
>   	lj_assertJ(ir->o == IR_TNEW || ir->o == IR_TDUP ||
>   		   ir->o == IR_CNEW || ir->o == IR_CNEWI,
>   		   "sunk parent IR %04d has bad op %d", refp - REF_BIAS, ir->o);
> -	if (ir->op1 >= T->nk) snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, ir->op1);
> -	if (ir->op2 >= T->nk) snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, ir->op2);
> +	m = lj_ir_mode[ir->o];
> +	if (irm_op1(m) == IRMref) snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, ir->op1);
> +	if (irm_op2(m) == IRMref) snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, ir->op2);
>   	if (LJ_HASFFI && ir->o == IR_CNEWI) {
>   	  if (LJ_32 && refp+1 < T->nins && (ir+1)->o == IR_HIOP)
>   	    snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, (ir+1)->op2);
> @@ -550,14 +552,16 @@ void lj_snap_replay(jit_State *J, GCtrace *T)
>         IRIns *ir = &T->ir[refp];
>         if (regsp_reg(ir->r) == RID_SUNK) {
>   	TRef op1, op2;
> +	uint8_t m;
>   	if (J->slot[snap_slot(sn)] != snap_slot(sn)) {  /* De-dup allocs. */
>   	  J->slot[snap_slot(sn)] = J->slot[J->slot[snap_slot(sn)]];
>   	  continue;
>   	}
>   	op1 = ir->op1;
> -	if (op1 >= T->nk) op1 = snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, op1);
> +	m = lj_ir_mode[ir->o];
> +	if (irm_op1(m) == IRMref) op1 = snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, op1);
>   	op2 = ir->op2;
> -	if (op2 >= T->nk) op2 = snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, op2);
> +	if (irm_op2(m) == IRMref) op2 = snap_pref(J, T, map, nent, seen, op2);
>   	if (LJ_HASFFI && ir->o == IR_CNEWI) {
>   	  if (LJ_32 && refp+1 < T->nins && (ir+1)->o == IR_HIOP) {
>   	    lj_needsplit(J);  /* Emit joining HIOP. */
> diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..1f2b5400
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/lj-1132-bad-snap-refs.test.lua
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +local tap = require('tap')
> +
> +-- Test file to demonstrate LuaJIT's crash in cases of sunk
> +-- restore for huge tables.
> +-- See also https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/issues/1132.
> +
> +local test = tap.test('lj-1132-bad-snap-refs'):skipcond({
> +  ['Test requires JIT enabled'] = not jit.status(),
> +})
> +
> +test:plan(1)
> +
> +local table_new = require('table.new')
> +
> +jit.opt.start('hotloop=1', 'hotexit=1')
> +
> +local result_tab
> +-- Create a trace containing the IR instruction:
> +-- | {sink}  tab TNEW   #32762  #0
> +-- `lj_snap_replay()` assumes that 32762 (0x7ffa) (op1 of TNEW) is
> +-- a constant reference. It is passed to the `snap_replay_const()`
> +-- lookup to the IR constant in the 0x7ffa slot.
> +-- This slot contains the second part of the IR constant
> +-- number 0.5029296875 (step of the cycle) in its raw form
> +-- (0x3fe0180000000000). The 0x18 part is treated as IROp
> +-- (IR_KGC), and JIT is trying to continue with a store of an
> +-- invalid GC object, which leads to a crash.
> +for i = 1, 2.5, 0.5029296875 do
> +  local sunk_tab = table_new(0x7ff9, 0)
> +  -- Force the side exit with restoration of the sunk table.
> +  if i > 2 then result_tab = sunk_tab end
> +end
> +
> +test:ok(type(result_tab) == 'table', 'no crash during sunk restore')
> +
> +test:done(true)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 14:11 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix unsinking TNEW with huge asize Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-24 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Optimize table.new() with constant args to (sinkable) IR_TNEW Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-31  9:20   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-31  9:36     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-05 14:39   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-24 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] Only emit proper parent references in snapshot replay Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-01-31  9:29   ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-06  9:46   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2024-02-06 10:07     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-06 11:07       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-06 11:41         ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-08 14:12           ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-02-15 13:45 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix unsinking TNEW with huge asize Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38004fc1-a985-4cf5-98bd-d207360f753d@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] Only emit proper parent references in snapshot replay.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox