Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Maxim Kokryashkin <m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org>
Cc: Maxim Kokryashkin <max.kokryashkin@gmail.com>,
	tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] profilers: purge generation mechanism
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:47:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <370699e3-9e7d-f24b-600d-970cd5bed080@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1694514399.719299784@f315.i.mail.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3881 bytes --]

Hi, Max


On 9/12/23 13:26, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
> Sure, consider this script:
> | jit.off()
> | misc.sysprof.start{mode = 'C', interval=10}
> | for i = 1, 1e7 do tostring(i) end
> | misc.sysprof.stop()

I failed with step:

$ cat prof.lua
jit.off()
misc.sysprof.start{mode = 'C', interval=10}
for i = 1, 1e7 do tostring(i) end
misc.sysprof.stop()

$ ./build/src/luajit prof.lua
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

119       lj_wbuf_addu64(buf, (uint64_t)pt->firstline);
(gdb) bt
#0  0x0000563092387308 in stream_lfunc (buf=0x563092449458 <sysprof+24>, 
func=0x7fdec2bda0a0)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:119
#1  0x00005630923874a9 in stream_frame_lua (buf=0x563092449458 
<sysprof+24>, frame=0x7fdec48a2cd8)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:141
#2  0x00005630923876b1 in stream_backtrace_lua (sp=0x563092449440 <sysprof>)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:169
#3  0x0000563092387ab1 in stream_guest (sp=0x563092449440 <sysprof>, 
vmstate=2)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:237
#4  0x0000563092387c3f in stream_event (sp=0x563092449440 <sysprof>, 
vmstate=2)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:274
#5  0x0000563092387d26 in sysprof_record_sample (sp=0x563092449440 
<sysprof>, info=0x7ffe5b59b730)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:296
#6  0x0000563092387ddc in sysprof_signal_handler (sig=27, 
info=0x7ffe5b59b730, ctx=0x7ffe5b59b600)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_sysprof.c:312
#7  <signal handler called>
#8  0x00005630923ca3c5 in lj_fff_res1 () at buildvm_x86.dasc:1890
#9  0x000056309232c8e2 in lua_pcall (L=0x7fdec48a1378, nargs=0, 
nresults=-1, errfunc=2)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_api.c:1172
#10 0x000056309231ec29 in docall (L=0x7fdec48a1378, narg=0, clear=0) at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/luajit.c:133
#11 0x000056309231f63d in handle_script (L=0x7fdec48a1378, 
argx=0x7ffe5b59c0b0)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/luajit.c:303
#12 0x000056309232059b in pmain (L=0x7fdec48a1378) at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/luajit.c:603
#13 0x00005630923c9029 in lj_BC_FUNCC () at buildvm_x86.dasc:852
#14 0x000056309232cf4a in lua_cpcall (L=0x7fdec48a1378, 
func=0x5630923203a3 <pmain>, ud=0x0)
     at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/lj_api.c:1207
#15 0x00005630923206b7 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7ffe5b59c0a8) at 
/home/sergeyb/sources/MRG/tarantool/third_party/luajit/src/luajit.c:632
(gdb)


> After running it with luajit you can parse the output
> like this:
> | $ time -v luajit-parse-sysprof sysprof.bin
> So, before the patch:
> | Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 224928
> And after the patch:
> | Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 32780
> Which is 85% reduction in memory consumption.


I propose to add these numbers to commit message.


> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim Kokryashkin
>
>     Вторник, 5 сентября 2023, 14:53 +03:00 от Sergey Bronnikov
>     <sergeyb@tarantool.org>:
>     Hi, Max
>
>     thanks for the patch. See my comment below.
>
>
>     On 8/28/23 18:23, Maxim Kokryashkin wrote:
>     > Since both of the profiler parsers are now processing
>     > the events in a stream-like fashion, the generation
>     > mechanism is excessive and can be purged. This results
>     > in a significant memory consumption drop, especially
>     > for the AVL-tree part.
>
>     Would be interesting to see a numbers with memory consumption
>
>     before and after the patch.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6612 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-14  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-28 15:23 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] profilers: purge generations Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-08-28 15:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] memprof: refactor symbol resolution Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-03 10:14   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-04  5:44     ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05 11:47   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-08 11:04     ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-06 14:52       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-08-28 15:23 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] profilers: purge generation mechanism Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-03 10:21   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-04  5:47     ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-05 11:53   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-12 10:26     ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-09-14  9:47       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2023-09-18  9:18         ` Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-06 14:43           ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-06 14:45             ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-06 14:40       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-10-06 14:52       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2023-11-13 18:48       ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2023-11-23  6:32 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] profilers: purge generations Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=370699e3-9e7d-f24b-600d-970cd5bed080@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
    --cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] profilers: purge generation mechanism' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox