From: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
To: imeevma@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@freelists.org,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/1] box: restore region after box.snapshot()
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:08:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36a23d77-0f7d-797d-66de-6e6903c28208@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90fd04c36016067157b95cf689eb8780daf79e96.1542192128.git.imeevma@gmail.com>
Vova, please, review.
On 14/11/2018 13:44, imeevma@tarantool.org wrote:
> Before this patch region wasn't restored after box.snapshot() so
> some tests fail due to "memory leak". This patch adds additional
> memory management and fixes mentioned failures.
>
> Closes #3732
> ---
> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/assigned/ImeevMA
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/imeevma/gh-3732-additional-memory-managament-in-box_snapshot
>
> src/box/memtx_engine.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> src/box/vy_log.c | 11 ++++++++---
> test/engine/snapshot.result | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> test/engine/snapshot.test.lua | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/box/memtx_engine.c b/src/box/memtx_engine.c
> index 5a5e87e..12be0f2 100644
> --- a/src/box/memtx_engine.c
> +++ b/src/box/memtx_engine.c
> @@ -589,28 +589,34 @@ struct checkpoint {
> bool touch;
> };
>
> -static int
> -checkpoint_init(struct checkpoint *ckpt, const char *snap_dirname,
> - uint64_t snap_io_rate_limit)
> +static struct checkpoint *
> +checkpoint_new(const char *snap_dirname, uint64_t snap_io_rate_limit)
> {
> + struct checkpoint *ckpt = malloc(sizeof(*ckpt));
> + if (ckpt == NULL) {
> + diag_set(OutOfMemory, sizeof(*ckpt), "malloc",
> + "struct checkpoint");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> rlist_create(&ckpt->entries);
> ckpt->waiting_for_snap_thread = false;
> xdir_create(&ckpt->dir, snap_dirname, SNAP, &INSTANCE_UUID);
> ckpt->snap_io_rate_limit = snap_io_rate_limit;
> vclock_create(&ckpt->vclock);
> ckpt->touch = false;
> - return 0;
> + return ckpt;
> }
>
> static void
> -checkpoint_destroy(struct checkpoint *ckpt)
> +checkpoint_delete(struct checkpoint *ckpt)
> {
> struct checkpoint_entry *entry;
> rlist_foreach_entry(entry, &ckpt->entries, link) {
> entry->iterator->free(entry->iterator);
> + free(entry);
> }
> - rlist_create(&ckpt->entries);
> xdir_destroy(&ckpt->dir);
> + free(ckpt);
> }
>
>
> @@ -625,11 +631,10 @@ checkpoint_add_space(struct space *sp, void *data)
> if (!pk)
> return 0;
> struct checkpoint *ckpt = (struct checkpoint *)data;
> - struct checkpoint_entry *entry;
> - entry = region_alloc_object(&fiber()->gc, struct checkpoint_entry);
> + struct checkpoint_entry *entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry));
> if (entry == NULL) {
> diag_set(OutOfMemory, sizeof(*entry),
> - "region", "struct checkpoint_entry");
> + "malloc", "struct checkpoint_entry");
> return -1;
> }
> rlist_add_tail_entry(&ckpt->entries, entry, link);
> @@ -693,19 +698,13 @@ memtx_engine_begin_checkpoint(struct engine *engine)
> struct memtx_engine *memtx = (struct memtx_engine *)engine;
>
> assert(memtx->checkpoint == NULL);
> - memtx->checkpoint = region_alloc_object(&fiber()->gc, struct checkpoint);
> - if (memtx->checkpoint == NULL) {
> - diag_set(OutOfMemory, sizeof(*memtx->checkpoint),
> - "region", "struct checkpoint");
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> - if (checkpoint_init(memtx->checkpoint, memtx->snap_dir.dirname,
> - memtx->snap_io_rate_limit) != 0)
> + memtx->checkpoint = checkpoint_new(memtx->snap_dir.dirname,
> + memtx->snap_io_rate_limit);
> + if (memtx->checkpoint == NULL)
> return -1;
>
> if (space_foreach(checkpoint_add_space, memtx->checkpoint) != 0) {
> - checkpoint_destroy(memtx->checkpoint);
> + checkpoint_delete(memtx->checkpoint);
> memtx->checkpoint = NULL;
> return -1;
> }
> @@ -790,7 +789,7 @@ memtx_engine_commit_checkpoint(struct engine *engine,
> xdir_add_vclock(&memtx->snap_dir, &memtx->checkpoint->vclock);
> }
>
> - checkpoint_destroy(memtx->checkpoint);
> + checkpoint_delete(memtx->checkpoint);
> memtx->checkpoint = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -818,7 +817,7 @@ memtx_engine_abort_checkpoint(struct engine *engine)
> INPROGRESS);
> (void) coio_unlink(filename);
>
> - checkpoint_destroy(memtx->checkpoint);
> + checkpoint_delete(memtx->checkpoint);
> memtx->checkpoint = NULL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/src/box/vy_log.c b/src/box/vy_log.c
> index fc8ede5..c7ed7cb 100644
> --- a/src/box/vy_log.c
> +++ b/src/box/vy_log.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ vy_log_flush(void)
> stailq_foreach_entry(record, &vy_log.tx, in_tx)
> tx_size++;
>
> + size_t used = region_used(&fiber()->gc);
> struct journal_entry *entry = journal_entry_new(tx_size);
> if (entry == NULL)
> return -1;
> @@ -770,7 +771,7 @@ vy_log_flush(void)
> tx_size * sizeof(struct xrow_header),
> alignof(struct xrow_header));
> if (rows == NULL)
> - return -1;
> + goto err;
>
> /*
> * Encode buffered records.
> @@ -780,7 +781,7 @@ vy_log_flush(void)
> assert(i < tx_size);
> struct xrow_header *row = &rows[i];
> if (vy_log_record_encode(record, row) < 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto err;
> entry->rows[i] = row;
> i++;
> }
> @@ -791,12 +792,16 @@ vy_log_flush(void)
> * so as not to block the tx thread.
> */
> if (wal_write_vy_log(entry) != 0)
> - return -1;
> + goto err;
>
> + region_truncate(&fiber()->gc, used);
> /* Success. Free flushed records. */
> region_reset(&vy_log.pool);
> stailq_create(&vy_log.tx);
> return 0;
> +err:
> + region_truncate(&fiber()->gc, used);
> + return -1;
> }
>
> void
> diff --git a/test/engine/snapshot.result b/test/engine/snapshot.result
> index a5aa08d..42009c2 100644
> --- a/test/engine/snapshot.result
> +++ b/test/engine/snapshot.result
> @@ -238,3 +238,38 @@ box.space.test.index.secondary:select{}
> box.space.test:drop()
> ---
> ...
> +--
> +-- sql: fix sql/gh-3199-no-mem-leaks.test.lua
> +-- One of the reason why this test failed - box.snapshot didn't
> +-- free region.
> +--
> +fiber = require('fiber')
> +---
> +...
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
> +---
> +- 0
> +...
> +box.snapshot()
> +---
> +- ok
> +...
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
> +---
> +- 0
> +...
> +box.snapshot()
> +---
> +- ok
> +...
> +box.snapshot()
> +---
> +- ok
> +...
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
> +---
> +- 0
> +...
> diff --git a/test/engine/snapshot.test.lua b/test/engine/snapshot.test.lua
> index 4bbbe40..2a32280 100644
> --- a/test/engine/snapshot.test.lua
> +++ b/test/engine/snapshot.test.lua
> @@ -41,3 +41,20 @@ box.space.test:select{}
> box.space.test.index.primary:select{}
> box.space.test.index.secondary:select{}
> box.space.test:drop()
> +
> +--
> +-- sql: fix sql/gh-3199-no-mem-leaks.test.lua
> +-- One of the reason why this test failed - box.snapshot didn't
> +-- free region.
> +--
> +
> +fiber = require('fiber')
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
> +box.snapshot()
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
> +box.snapshot()
> +box.snapshot()
> +-- Should be 0.
> +fiber.info()[fiber.self().id()].memory.used
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 10:44 imeevma
2018-11-14 11:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy [this message]
2018-11-15 11:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36a23d77-0f7d-797d-66de-6e6903c28208@tarantool.org \
--to=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--cc=imeevma@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--subject='Re: [tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/1] box: restore region after box.snapshot()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox