Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/3] Fix potential file descriptor leak in luaL_loadfile*().
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 18:49:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36145b26-9f2e-4983-b8d5-cb5e4012c9ef@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEMF7Bna3Er0efoF@root>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

LGTM

On 6/6/25 18:14, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On 06.06.25, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
>> Hello, Sergey,
>>
>> the test is passed when CMake option -DLUAJIT_USE_VALGRIND=ON is used and
>>
>> patch with fix is reverted.
> You should run it with the corresponding env variable (like it is done
> in the CI), see the comment in the test header:
>
> | VALGRIND_OPTS="--track-fds=yes" ctest -V -R lj-1249

It works, thanks, but the test is still passed.

In  private conversation, we have found a reason - I have a version of 
Valgrind,

that doesn't fail on detected fd leak:

Release 3.24.0 (31 Oct 2024)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

...

* ==================== CORE CHANGES ===================

* Bad file descriptor usage now generates a real error with
   --track-fds=yes that is suppressible and shows up in the xml output
   with full execution backtrace. The warnings shown without using the
   option are deprecated and will be removed in a future valgrind
   version.

The same behavior is in our CI, because Valgrind 3.24.0 is in 25.04+, 
but in GHA the latest version is 24.04.

1. https://repology.org/project/valgrind/versions

2. 
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners

>> Sergey

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-06 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-05  5:44 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/3] Fix descriptor leak in loadfile Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-05  5:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/3] ci: add track-fds Valgrind scenario Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 13:56   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 14:03     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 14:54       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 15:31         ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-05  5:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/3] Fix potential file descriptor leak in luaL_loadfile*() Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 14:47   ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 15:14     ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2025-06-06 15:49       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2025-06-05  5:44 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/3] Fix another " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36145b26-9f2e-4983-b8d5-cb5e4012c9ef@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/3] Fix potential file descriptor leak in luaL_loadfile*().' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox