Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Cc: Kirill Shcherbatov <kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] box: refactor key_def_set_compare_func routine
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:15:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34cf8ed7af4b1da74a89a260562abe08526cd4e8.1552478226.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1552478226.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org>

Refactored tuple_compare_create and tuple_compare_with_key_create
routines to set corresponding key_def field by it's own instead of
returning pointer to function. This is required as in further
patches we should set two key_def pointers: for hinted and for
non-hinted routine version.

Needed for #3961
---
 src/box/tuple_compare.cc | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/box/tuple_compare.cc b/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
index cf4519ccb..1bcff2ca3 100644
--- a/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
+++ b/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
@@ -1049,21 +1049,26 @@ static const tuple_compare_t compare_slowpath_funcs[] = {
 	tuple_compare_slowpath<true, true, true>
 };
 
-static tuple_compare_t
-tuple_compare_create(const struct key_def *def)
+void
+key_def_set_tuple_compare(struct key_def *def)
 {
 	int cmp_func_idx = (def->is_nullable ? 1 : 0) +
 			   2 * (def->has_optional_parts ? 1 : 0) +
 			   4 * (def->has_json_paths ? 1 : 0);
 	if (def->is_nullable) {
 		if (key_def_is_sequential(def)) {
-			if (def->has_optional_parts)
-				return tuple_compare_sequential<true, true>;
-			else
-				return tuple_compare_sequential<true, false>;
+			if (def->has_optional_parts) {
+				def->tuple_compare =
+					tuple_compare_sequential<true, true>;
+			} else {
+				def->tuple_compare =
+					tuple_compare_sequential<true, false>;
+			}
 		} else {
-			return compare_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
+			def->tuple_compare =
+				compare_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
 		}
+		return;
 	}
 	assert(! def->has_optional_parts);
 	if (!key_def_has_collation(def) && !def->has_json_paths) {
@@ -1078,13 +1083,15 @@ tuple_compare_create(const struct key_def *def)
 				    cmp_arr[k].p[i * 2 + 1])
 					break;
 			if (i == def->part_count &&
-			    cmp_arr[k].p[i * 2] == UINT32_MAX)
-				return cmp_arr[k].f;
+			    cmp_arr[k].p[i * 2] == UINT32_MAX) {
+				def->tuple_compare = cmp_arr[k].f;
+				return;
+			}
 		}
 	}
-	return key_def_is_sequential(def) ?
-	       tuple_compare_sequential<false, false> :
-	       compare_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
+	def->tuple_compare = key_def_is_sequential(def) ?
+			     tuple_compare_sequential<false, false> :
+			     compare_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
 }
 
 /* }}} tuple_compare */
@@ -1277,8 +1284,8 @@ static const tuple_compare_with_key_t compare_with_key_slowpath_funcs[] = {
 	tuple_compare_with_key_slowpath<true, true, true>
 };
 
-static tuple_compare_with_key_t
-tuple_compare_with_key_create(const struct key_def *def)
+void
+key_def_set_tuple_compare_with_key(struct key_def *def)
 {
 	int cmp_func_idx = (def->is_nullable ? 1 : 0) +
 			   2 * (def->has_optional_parts ? 1 : 0) +
@@ -1286,15 +1293,19 @@ tuple_compare_with_key_create(const struct key_def *def)
 	if (def->is_nullable) {
 		if (key_def_is_sequential(def)) {
 			if (def->has_optional_parts) {
-				return tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<true,
+				def->tuple_compare_with_key =
+					tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<true,
 									 true>;
 			} else {
-				return tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<true,
+				def->tuple_compare_with_key =
+					tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<true,
 									 false>;
 			}
 		} else {
-			return compare_with_key_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
+			def->tuple_compare_with_key =
+				compare_with_key_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
 		}
+		return;
 	}
 	assert(! def->has_optional_parts);
 	if (!key_def_has_collation(def) && !def->has_json_paths) {
@@ -1312,13 +1323,16 @@ tuple_compare_with_key_create(const struct key_def *def)
 					break;
 				}
 			}
-			if (i == def->part_count)
-				return cmp_wk_arr[k].f;
+			if (i == def->part_count) {
+				def->tuple_compare_with_key = cmp_wk_arr[k].f;
+				return;
+			}
 		}
 	}
-	return key_def_is_sequential(def) ?
-	       tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<false, false> :
-	       compare_with_key_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
+	def->tuple_compare_with_key =
+		key_def_is_sequential(def) ?
+		tuple_compare_with_key_sequential<false, false> :
+		compare_with_key_slowpath_funcs[cmp_func_idx];
 }
 
 /* }}} tuple_compare_with_key */
@@ -1326,6 +1340,6 @@ tuple_compare_with_key_create(const struct key_def *def)
 void
 key_def_set_compare_func(struct key_def *def)
 {
-	def->tuple_compare = tuple_compare_create(def);
-	def->tuple_compare_with_key = tuple_compare_with_key_create(def);
+	key_def_set_tuple_compare(def);
+	key_def_set_tuple_compare_with_key(def);
 }
-- 
2.21.0

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 12:15 [PATCH v6 0/3] box: introduce hint option for memtx tree index Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-03-13 12:15 ` Kirill Shcherbatov [this message]
2019-03-14  7:04   ` [PATCH v6 1/3] box: refactor key_def_set_compare_func routine Vladimir Davydov
2019-03-15 10:20     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-03-15 10:55       ` Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-03-19 19:38       ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-03-13 12:15 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] memtx: introduce tuple compare hint Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-03-14  8:19   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-03-15 10:20     ` [tarantool-patches] " Kirill Shcherbatov
2019-03-20 18:08       ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-03-13 12:15 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] box: introduce multikey indexes Kirill Shcherbatov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34cf8ed7af4b1da74a89a260562abe08526cd4e8.1552478226.git.kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
    --to=kshcherbatov@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] box: refactor key_def_set_compare_func routine' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox