From: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:06:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2cb79b7d-b2f4-fc42-b707-31e109b0ff69@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119194100.840495-3-gorcunov@gmail.com>
19.11.2020 22:40, Cyrill Gorcunov пишет:
> We will be updating replication_synchro_quorum parameter
> dynamically once we add support for number evaluation
> via symbolic formula, thus the update will be called
> not only from manual configuration changes but from
> cluster updates as well.
>
> Thus to reuse the code lets gather it into a separate
> routine.
>
> Part-of #5446
Hi! Thanks for the patch!
Please find my comments below.
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> ---
> src/box/box.cc | 4 +---
> src/box/replication.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> src/box/replication.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/box/box.cc b/src/box/box.cc
> index 1f7dec362..5fcf28cb3 100644
> --- a/src/box/box.cc
> +++ b/src/box/box.cc
> @@ -924,9 +924,7 @@ box_set_replication_synchro_quorum(void)
> int value = box_check_replication_synchro_quorum();
> if (value < 0)
> return -1;
> - replication_synchro_quorum = value;
> - txn_limbo_on_parameters_change(&txn_limbo);
> - raft_cfg_election_quorum(box_raft());
> + replication_synchro_quorum_update(value);
> return 0;
> }
IMO it'd be better to name the new function somewhat similar to
`box_update_replication_synchro_quorum` and leave it in box.cc
This way you avoid adding 2 new dependencies to replication.cc
and leave all the code dealing with reconfiguration at one place.
Besides, replication.cc already depends on box, so it won't be a problem
to call update_replication_synchro_quorum there.
>
> diff --git a/src/box/replication.cc b/src/box/replication.cc
> index 65512cf0f..c83392f81 100644
> --- a/src/box/replication.cc
> +++ b/src/box/replication.cc
> @@ -40,7 +40,9 @@
> #include "gc.h"
> #include "error.h"
> #include "relay.h"
> +#include "raft.h"
> #include "sio.h"
> +#include "txn_limbo.h"
>
> uint32_t instance_id = REPLICA_ID_NIL;
> struct tt_uuid INSTANCE_UUID;
> @@ -82,6 +84,22 @@ replicaset_quorum(void)
> return MIN(replication_connect_quorum, replicaset.applier.total);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * Update the synchro quorum number and propagate the
> + * change to dependent subsystems.
> + */
> +void
> +replication_synchro_quorum_update(int value)
> +{
> + assert(value > 0 && value < VCLOCK_MAX);
> +
> + say_info("replication: replication_synchro_quorum = %d", value);
Load_cfg.lua will say something similar, when replication_synchro_quorum is
a number:
```
log.info("set '%s' configuration option to %s", key,
json.encode(val))
```
So this say_info belongs to the trigger you invoke on replica
register/unregister.
> +
> + replication_synchro_quorum = value;
> + txn_limbo_on_parameters_change(&txn_limbo);
> + raft_cfg_election_quorum(box_raft());
> +}
> +
> void
> replication_init(void)
> {
> diff --git a/src/box/replication.h b/src/box/replication.h
> index e57912848..ced519612 100644
> --- a/src/box/replication.h
> +++ b/src/box/replication.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ replication_disconnect_timeout(void)
> return replication_timeout * 4;
> }
>
> +void
> +replication_synchro_quorum_update(int value);
> +
> void
> replication_init(void);
>
--
Serge Petrenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 19:40 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 0/4] qsync: evaluate replication_synchro_quorum dynamically Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 1/4] cfg: add cfg_isnumber helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 9:53 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:06 ` Serge Petrenko [this message]
2020-11-20 11:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 11:39 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 3/4] cfg: prepare symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:32 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 11:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 11:56 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 14:38 ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-26 14:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-26 16:01 ` Mons Anderson
2020-11-19 19:41 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 10:50 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 12:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-11-20 12:41 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-11-20 15:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2cb79b7d-b2f4-fc42-b707-31e109b0ff69@tarantool.org \
--to=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox