From: Sergey Ostanevich <sergos@tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/3] core: remove excess assertion inside memprof
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 13:50:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2B46045C-1624-431A-AC2A-0BA583A45990@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201230095031.GR14702@root>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2177 bytes --]
Hi!
Thanks for the patch!
Just one nit in comments.
LGTM.
Sergos
>
> Reworded. See the iterative patch below. Branch is force-pushed.
>
> | core: remove excess assertion inside memprof
> |
> | There are the cases when the memory profiler attempts to attribute
^^^ remove, just 'there are cases'
> | allocations triggered by JIT engine recording phase with a Lua function
> | to be recorded. At this case lj_debug_frameline() may return BC_NOPOS
> | (i.e. a negative value) so the assertion in the Lua writer
> | memprof_write_lfunc() is violated.
> |
> | This patch removes this assertion. For negative returned line value
> | profiler is reported zero frameline.
> |
> | Follows up tarantool/tarantool#5442
>
>>
>>> ** -DLUAJIT_DISABLE_DEBUGINFO flag.
>>> */
>>> - lua_assert(line >= 0);
>>> - lj_wbuf_addbyte(out, aevent | ASOURCE_LFUNC);
>>> - lj_wbuf_addu64(out, (uintptr_t)funcproto(fn));
>>> - lj_wbuf_addu64(out, (uint64_t)line);
>>> + lj_wbuf_addu64(out, line >= 0 ? (uint64_t)line : 0);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void memprof_write_cfunc(struct lj_wbuf *out, uint8_t aevent,
>>> --
>>> 2.28.0
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> IM
>
> ===================================================================
> diff --git a/src/lj_memprof.c b/src/lj_memprof.c
> index 0568049..37ec4c9 100644
> --- a/src/lj_memprof.c
> +++ b/src/lj_memprof.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,10 @@ static void memprof_write_lfunc(struct lj_wbuf *out, uint8_t aevent,
> lj_wbuf_addu64(out, (uintptr_t)funcproto(fn));
> /*
> ** Line is >= 0 if we are inside a Lua function.
> - ** An exception may be when the Lua function is on top.
> + ** There are the cases when the memory profiler attempts
> + ** to attribute allocations triggered by JIT engine recording
> + ** phase with a Lua function to be recorded. At this case
> + ** lj_debug_frameline() may return BC_NOPOS (i.e. a negative value).
> ** Equals to zero when LuaJIT is built with the
> ** -DLUAJIT_DISABLE_DEBUGINFO flag.
> */
> ===================================================================
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey Kaplun
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 29367 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-30 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-29 22:22 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/3] LuaJIT memory profiler bug fixes Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-29 22:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/3] misc: fix build with disabled memory profiler Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 8:49 ` Igor Munkin
2020-12-30 8:52 ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 9:42 ` Sergey Ostanevich
2020-12-29 22:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/3] core: fix resources leak in " Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 9:06 ` Igor Munkin
2020-12-30 9:31 ` Sergey Ostanevich
2020-12-30 9:33 ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 9:32 ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 9:53 ` Sergey Ostanevich
2020-12-29 22:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/3] core: remove excess assertion inside memprof Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 9:39 ` Igor Munkin
2020-12-30 9:50 ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 10:50 ` Sergey Ostanevich [this message]
2020-12-30 11:06 ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-12-30 8:24 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/3] LuaJIT memory profiler bug fixes Alexander V. Tikhonov
2020-12-30 11:20 ` Igor Munkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2B46045C-1624-431A-AC2A-0BA583A45990@tarantool.org \
--to=sergos@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/3] core: remove excess assertion inside memprof' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox