Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests
@ 2024-12-19  9:30 Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
  2024-12-20 10:59 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-12-19  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maxim Kokryashkin, Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches

The `strtod parsing` subtest in the <lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua> checks
the results yielded by the `strtod()` via FFI call. In glibc versions
before 2.28 it returns an incorrect result (NaN instead of inf) for
"0x3p1023" [1]. This patch hardens the skipcond for this test for a
smaller version of the libc installed.

[1]: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279
---

Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-glibc-versions

The CI failure for libc 2.23 (ubuntu 16):
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159316/job/34542626889?pr=10949#step:5:13916
The CI failure for libc 2.24 (debian 9):
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159307/job/34542633454?pr=10949#step:5:13859
The CI failure for libc 2.27 (ubuntu 18):
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159278/job/34542625496?pr=10949#step:5:11743
The CI pass for libc 2.31 (ubuntu 20):
https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159289/job/34542630993?pr=10949

 test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
index ac7d68a4..800c57b0 100644
--- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
+++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
@@ -186,9 +186,11 @@ do --- tonumber parsing
   test_conv(tonumber)
 end
 
--- Skip for the old libc version with the bug in the `strtod()`.
--- See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
-do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.19
+-- Skip for the old libc version with the bugs in the `strtod()`.
+-- Affected versions:
+-- * <2.19: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
+-- * <2.28: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279.
+do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.28
   test_conv(function(s)
     local d = ffi.C.strtod(s, e)
     return (e[0][0] == 0 and #s ~= 0) and d or nil
-- 
2.47.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests
  2024-12-19  9:30 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-12-20 10:59 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
  2024-12-20 12:15   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-12-20 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergey Kaplun, Maxim Kokryashkin; +Cc: tarantool-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3340 bytes --]

Hello, Sergey,

thanks for the patch! See comments below.


On 19.12.2024 12:30, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> The `strtod parsing` subtest in the <lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua> checks
> the results yielded by the `strtod()` via FFI call. In glibc versions
> before 2.28 it returns an incorrect result (NaN instead of inf) for
> "0x3p1023" [1]. This patch hardens the skipcond for this test for a
> smaller version of the libc installed.
>
> [1]:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279
> ---
>
> Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-glibc-versions
>
> The CI failure for libc 2.23 (ubuntu 16):
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159316/job/34542626889?pr=10949#step:5:13916
Ubuntu 16.04 EOL and EOS are reached [1]
> The CI failure for libc 2.24 (debian 9):
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159307/job/34542633454?pr=10949#step:5:13859
Debian 9 EOL is reached 4 years ago [2]
> The CI failure for libc 2.27 (ubuntu 18):
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159278/job/34542625496?pr=10949#step:5:11743
> The CI pass for libc 2.31 (ubuntu 20):
> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159289/job/34542630993?pr=10949
Ubuntu 20.04 support ends in 3 months and 2 week [1].


>
>   test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua | 8 +++++---
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> index ac7d68a4..800c57b0 100644
> --- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> +++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> @@ -186,9 +186,11 @@ do --- tonumber parsing
>     test_conv(tonumber)
>   end
>   
> --- Skip for the old libc version with the bug in the `strtod()`.
> --- See alsohttps://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
> -do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.19
> +-- Skip for the old libc version with the bugs in the `strtod()`.
> +-- Affected versions:
> +-- * <2.19:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
> +-- * <2.28:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279.

I propose to skip strtod test when Glibc is older than say 2.30 [3] and 
avoid testing

with ancient Glibc versions because Glibc implementation is buggy [4] and

a there are lot of bugs in old and more or less new versions:

v2.41 [5], v2.22 [6], v2.27 [7], v2.15 [8], v2.33 [9] etc [10].


I don't think we should waste our time with issues like this.


1. https://endoflife.date/ubuntu

2. https://endoflife.date/debian

3. https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release

4. 
https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/cd5ab5da9b56bf560407554c0377cfa8567d4430/src/lj_strscan.c#L20-L27

5. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30220

6. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19380

7. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15744

8. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14049

9. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26137

10. 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=strtod&no_redirect=1&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=glibc&query_format=specific

> +do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.28
>     test_conv(function(s)
>       local d = ffi.C.strtod(s, e)
>       return (e[0][0] == 0 and #s ~= 0) and d or nil

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6871 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests
  2024-12-20 10:59 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-12-20 12:15   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
  2024-12-20 12:21     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-12-20 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergey Bronnikov; +Cc: tarantool-patches

Hi, Sergey!
Thanks for the review!
See my answers below.

On 20.12.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Hello, Sergey,
> 
> thanks for the patch! See comments below.
> 
> 
> On 19.12.2024 12:30, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > The `strtod parsing` subtest in the <lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua> checks
> > the results yielded by the `strtod()` via FFI call. In glibc versions
> > before 2.28 it returns an incorrect result (NaN instead of inf) for
> > "0x3p1023" [1]. This patch hardens the skipcond for this test for a
> > smaller version of the libc installed.
> >
> > [1]:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279
> > ---
> >
> > Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-glibc-versions
> >
> > The CI failure for libc 2.23 (ubuntu 16):
> > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159316/job/34542626889?pr=10949#step:5:13916
> Ubuntu 16.04 EOL and EOS are reached [1]
> > The CI failure for libc 2.24 (debian 9):
> > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159307/job/34542633454?pr=10949#step:5:13859
> Debian 9 EOL is reached 4 years ago [2]
> > The CI failure for libc 2.27 (ubuntu 18):
> > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159278/job/34542625496?pr=10949#step:5:11743
> > The CI pass for libc 2.31 (ubuntu 20):
> > https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159289/job/34542630993?pr=10949
> Ubuntu 20.04 support ends in 3 months and 2 week [1].

Yes, unfortunately we should keep (AFAICS) these runners to check the
installations for our customers.

> 
> 
> >
> >   test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua | 8 +++++---
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> > index ac7d68a4..800c57b0 100644
> > --- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> > +++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
> > @@ -186,9 +186,11 @@ do --- tonumber parsing
> >     test_conv(tonumber)
> >   end
> >   
> > --- Skip for the old libc version with the bug in the `strtod()`.
> > --- See alsohttps://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
> > -do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.19
> > +-- Skip for the old libc version with the bugs in the `strtod()`.
> > +-- Affected versions:
> > +-- * <2.19:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
> > +-- * <2.28:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279.
> 
> I propose to skip strtod test when Glibc is older than say 2.30 [3] and 
> avoid testing
> 
> with ancient Glibc versions because Glibc implementation is buggy [4] and
> 
> a there are lot of bugs in old and more or less new versions:
> 
> v2.41 [5], v2.22 [6], v2.27 [7], v2.15 [8], v2.33 [9] etc [10].
> 
> 
> I don't think we should waste our time with issues like this.
> 
> 
> 1. https://endoflife.date/ubuntu
> 
> 2. https://endoflife.date/debian
> 
> 3. https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release
> 
> 4. 
> https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/cd5ab5da9b56bf560407554c0377cfa8567d4430/src/lj_strscan.c#L20-L27
> 
> 5. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30220
> 
> 6. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19380
> 
> 7. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15744
> 
> 8. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
> 
> 9. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26137
> 
> 10. 
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=strtod&no_redirect=1&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=glibc&query_format=specific

Yes, I agree that this should be the last red line for us. If the test
will fail again due to glibc, it will be easier just to drop it. For
now, I see no failures for versions 2.31 -- 2.40, and find no bugs
related to our tests that affected versions 2.28 -- 2.30, so let's skip
it for versions less than 2.28 for now.

> 
> > +do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.28
> >     test_conv(function(s)
> >       local d = ffi.C.strtod(s, e)
> >       return (e[0][0] == 0 and #s ~= 0) and d or nil

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests
  2024-12-20 12:15   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
@ 2024-12-20 12:21     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches @ 2024-12-20 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sergey Kaplun; +Cc: tarantool-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4313 bytes --]

Hi, Sergey,


On 20.12.2024 15:15, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> Hi, Sergey!
> Thanks for the review!
> See my answers below.
>
> On 20.12.24, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
>> Hello, Sergey,
>>
>> thanks for the patch! See comments below.
>>
>>
>> On 19.12.2024 12:30, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
>>> The `strtod parsing` subtest in the <lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua> checks
>>> the results yielded by the `strtod()` via FFI call. In glibc versions
>>> before 2.28 it returns an incorrect result (NaN instead of inf) for
>>> "0x3p1023" [1]. This patch hardens the skipcond for this test for a
>>> smaller version of the libc installed.
>>>
>>> [1]:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Branch:https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/skaplun/gh-noticket-fix-glibc-versions
>>>
>>> The CI failure for libc 2.23 (ubuntu 16):
>>> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159316/job/34542626889?pr=10949#step:5:13916
>> Ubuntu 16.04 EOL and EOS are reached [1]
>>> The CI failure for libc 2.24 (debian 9):
>>> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159307/job/34542633454?pr=10949#step:5:13859
>> Debian 9 EOL is reached 4 years ago [2]
>>> The CI failure for libc 2.27 (ubuntu 18):
>>> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159278/job/34542625496?pr=10949#step:5:11743
>>> The CI pass for libc 2.31 (ubuntu 20):
>>> https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/actions/runs/12376159289/job/34542630993?pr=10949
>> Ubuntu 20.04 support ends in 3 months and 2 week [1].
> Yes, unfortunately we should keep (AFAICS) these runners to check the
> installations for our customers.
>
I believe we will clarify a list of Linux distros in a separate activity.


>>
>>>    test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua | 8 +++++---
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
>>> index ac7d68a4..800c57b0 100644
>>> --- a/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
>>> +++ b/test/LuaJIT-tests/lib/base/tonumber_scan.lua
>>> @@ -186,9 +186,11 @@ do --- tonumber parsing
>>>      test_conv(tonumber)
>>>    end
>>>    
>>> --- Skip for the old libc version with the bug in the `strtod()`.
>>> --- See alsohttps://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
>>> -do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.19
>>> +-- Skip for the old libc version with the bugs in the `strtod()`.
>>> +-- Affected versions:
>>> +-- * <2.19:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16151.
>>> +-- * <2.28:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23279.
>> I propose to skip strtod test when Glibc is older than say 2.30 [3] and
>> avoid testing
>>
>> with ancient Glibc versions because Glibc implementation is buggy [4] and
>>
>> a there are lot of bugs in old and more or less new versions:
>>
>> v2.41 [5], v2.22 [6], v2.27 [7], v2.15 [8], v2.33 [9] etc [10].
>>
>>
>> I don't think we should waste our time with issues like this.
>>
>>
>> 1.https://endoflife.date/ubuntu
>>
>> 2.https://endoflife.date/debian
>>
>> 3.https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release
>>
>> 4.
>> https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/blob/cd5ab5da9b56bf560407554c0377cfa8567d4430/src/lj_strscan.c#L20-L27
>>
>> 5.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30220
>>
>> 6.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19380
>>
>> 7.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15744
>>
>> 8.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14049
>>
>> 9.https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26137
>>
>> 10.
>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=strtod&no_redirect=1&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=glibc&query_format=specific
> Yes, I agree that this should be the last red line for us. If the test
> will fail again due to glibc, it will be easier just to drop it. For
> now, I see no failures for versions 2.31 -- 2.40, and find no bugs
> related to our tests that affected versions 2.28 -- 2.30, so let's skip
> it for versions less than 2.28 for now.

Okay, LGTM then.

Also discussed it and decided to remove the test if the same issue will 
happen next time.

>
>>> +do --- strtod parsing -libc<2.28
>>>      test_conv(function(s)
>>>        local d = ffi.C.strtod(s, e)
>>>        return (e[0][0] == 0 and #s ~= 0) and d or nil

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8039 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-20 12:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-19  9:30 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: harden skipcond for libc in LuaJIT-tests Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-12-20 10:59 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2024-12-20 12:15   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2024-12-20 12:21     ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox