From: Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Prevent recording of loops with -0 step or NaN values.
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:32:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <256a4bfa-edea-4971-b5c3-3b94a102c6d9@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abPh4iY67H2yJubb@root>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 896 bytes --]
Hi, Sergey,
thanks for the fixes!
Sergey
On 3/13/26 13:07, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
<snipped>
>>> +local function test_trace_recorded(test_payload)
>>> + jit.flush()
>>> + -- Reset hotcounters.
>> nit: comment can be omitted
> I prefer not to. There may be the question: why we don't declare this
> parameters once? The reason is that the hotcounters may cause collisions
> and lead to the false-positive tests failures. Should I make the comment
> more verbose?
We reset hotcounters in tests about 470 times (grep -R -B 1 "hotloop=1"
test | wc -l) and only
15 times we add a comment like "Reset hotcounters.". You add a comment
here but missed it in the patch
"MIPS64: Avoid unaligned load in lj_vm_exit_interp.". Why we should
leave comment here and
omit it the aforementioned patch? I'll not insist removing it, just
interesting, it is not an issue for blocking merge.
>
<snipped>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1877 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 15:55 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/2] Fix corner cases of for loop recording Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-12 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Prevent recording of loops with -0 step or NaN values Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-13 8:52 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-13 10:07 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-13 14:32 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2026-03-13 14:41 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-12 15:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/2] DUALNUM: Fix recording of loops broken by previous change Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-03-13 10:11 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=256a4bfa-edea-4971-b5c3-3b94a102c6d9@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/2] Prevent recording of loops with -0 step or NaN values.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox