Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>
To: Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com>,
	Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>,
	Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 2/4] recovery: allow to ignore rows coming from a certain instance
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:35:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <249D8BCD-BB40-43A9-B7FF-3A084991C3A1@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219090251.GC6538@atlas>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2236 bytes --]



> 19 февр. 2020 г., в 12:02, Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> * Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org <mailto:sergepetrenko@tarantool.org>> [20/02/19 12:01]:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 19 февр. 2020 г., в 11:52, Konstantin Osipov <kostja.osipov@gmail.com> написал(а):
>>> 
>>> * Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> [20/02/19 11:45]:
>>>>> This is a strange way to mute rows from self. Why not set vclock
>>>>> component to infinity as I suggested multiple times? Why not
>>>>> respond to me with objection if my suggestion  can not be done?
>>>> 
>>>> I responded with a patch, so now we can discuss both your and my suggestions.
>>> 
>>> No, we can't. You responded with a patch for your suggestion, but
>>> not for mine. So we compare apples and oranges here. Just like
>>> with Ilya's patch, which only half way captured my suggestion in
>>> his "alternatives".
>>> 
>>> In the end I'm not even sure you got it right.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> If I understood you correctly, you suggested to set replica self lsn to infinity
>>>> (on master side), so that recovery on masters side would skip replicas rows.
>>>> 
>> 
>> Does it look like I got it right from my answer?
> 
> I don't understand. For example, what do you mean by setting it on
> the master? You were supposed to set it on the replica, when
> sending a SUBSCRIBE request to the master.

I mean taking replica clock from a subscribe request and setting replica_clock[replica->id] = INT64_MAX.
This is done on master in relay_subscribe() called from box_process_subscribe(). Then relay recovery is initialized
with this vclock making recovery skip rows coming from the replica itself.

I’m starting to think that you want me to mangle only with replicaset.applier.vclock
Sorry if I missed it in the very beginning of our discussion.

> Honestly, your English isn't perfect, we don't share the same
> vocabulary/terms, so it's hard to see what went wrong without a
> patch.

Ok, I’ll send a patch soon.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Konstantin Osipov, Moscow, Russia
> https://scylladb.com <https://scylladb.com/>

--
Serge Petrenko
sergepetrenko@tarantool.org



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13067 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-18 17:37 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 0/4] replication: fix applying of rows originating from local instance Serge Petrenko
2020-02-18 17:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 1/4] box: expose box_is_orphan method Serge Petrenko
2020-02-18 17:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 2/4] recovery: allow to ignore rows coming from a certain instance Serge Petrenko
2020-02-18 19:03   ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-19  8:43     ` Serge Petrenko
2020-02-19  8:52       ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-19  8:57         ` Serge Petrenko
2020-02-19  9:02           ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-19  9:35             ` Serge Petrenko [this message]
2020-02-19 10:11               ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-19 10:31                 ` Serge Petrenko
2020-02-19 11:27                   ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-18 17:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 3/4] replication: do not relay rows coming from a remote instance back to it Serge Petrenko
2020-02-18 19:07   ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-18 17:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 4/4] wal: warn when trying to write a record with a broken lsn Serge Petrenko
2020-02-22 20:21 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 0/4] replication: fix applying of rows originating from local instance Georgy Kirichenko
2020-02-22 20:49   ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-23  8:16     ` Georgy Kirichenko
2020-02-24 10:18       ` Konstantin Osipov
2020-02-24 12:31         ` Георгий Кириченко
2020-02-26 10:09           ` Sergey Petrenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=249D8BCD-BB40-43A9-B7FF-3A084991C3A1@tarantool.org \
    --to=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
    --cc=kostja.osipov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v3 2/4] recovery: allow to ignore rows coming from a certain instance' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox