From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org
Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 19:39:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <239B8EBA-F577-4C9A-BDD9-D76DE10FEB76@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487a209-af7b-5d1f-6fff-fc589782d571@tarantool.org>
>>> I propose you to either come up with a better solution or to use one of
>>> my solutions:
>>>
>>> * return AFFINITY_MASK as P5_FIELD_TYPE_MASK, and add a static assertion
>>> that P5_FIELD_TYPE_MASK < (1 << bit_count(field_type)).
>>>
>>> Or write in field_def.h something like this:
>>>
>>> static_assert(bit_count(field_type) <= 4,
>>> "size of enum field_type is used in "\
>>> "VdbeOp.p5 to fit it into 4 bits”);
>> To be honest I don’t understand these bit assertions.
>> Why can’t we simply check that field_type_MAX <= 15?
>> diff --git a/src/box/field_def.c b/src/box/field_def.c
>> index b34d2ccd9..1a8074650 100644
>> --- a/src/box/field_def.c
>> +++ b/src/box/field_def.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,13 @@
>> #include "trivia/util.h"
>> #include "key_def.h"
>> +/**
>> + * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc
>> + * opcodes in vdbe.c.
>> + */
>> +static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\
>> + "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5");
>> +
>> Also, as you may notice, I placed it to field_def.c
>> Seems that field_def.h is used to generate module.h,
>> which in turn doesn’t tolerate this kind of assert.
>
> field_def.h is not copied to module.h entirely. Only
> the code between /** \cond public */ and /** \endcond public */.
> Please, put this assertion below /** \endcond public */.
Didn’t pay attention to that. Fixed:
diff --git a/src/box/field_def.c b/src/box/field_def.c
index 1a8074650..b34d2ccd9 100644
--- a/src/box/field_def.c
+++ b/src/box/field_def.c
@@ -33,13 +33,6 @@
#include "trivia/util.h"
#include "key_def.h"
-/**
- * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc
- * opcodes in vdbe.c.
- */
-static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\
- "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5");
-
const char *mp_type_strs[] = {
/* .MP_NIL = */ "nil",
/* .MP_UINT = */ "unsigned",
diff --git a/src/box/field_def.h b/src/box/field_def.h
index 93e38ea55..358e35f69 100644
--- a/src/box/field_def.h
+++ b/src/box/field_def.h
@@ -87,6 +87,13 @@ affinity_type_str(enum affinity_type type);
/** \endcond public */
+/**
+ * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc
+ * opcodes in vdbe.c.
+ */
+static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\
+ "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5");
+
extern const char *field_type_strs[];
extern const char *on_conflict_action_strs[];
>> diff --git a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
>> index 80d2fd0aa..358b69754 100644
>> --- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
>> +++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
>> @@ -2164,17 +2151,24 @@ case OP_Ge: { /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */
>> break;
>> }
>> } else {
>> - /* Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison. */
>> - affinity = pOp->p5 & AFFINITY_MASK;
>> - if (affinity>=AFFINITY_INTEGER) {
>> + /*
>> + * Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison.
>> + * 15 is 1111 in a binary form.
>> + * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4 bits
>> + * (field_type_MAX == 10), it is enough to 'and'
>> + * p5 with this constant. Node that all other flags
>> + * that can be stored in p5 are >= 16.
>
> Firstly, as I said in the previous review, field_type_MAX == 9.
> Secondly, please, do not use a constant. All of them (15, 111, 10, 16).
> Instead of this huge comment full of constants just create a enum
> value with an appropriate name, like FIELD_TYPE_MASK = 15, it is
> even ok to put this name into field_def.h. Thirdly, not all p5 flags
> are >= 16. But for these concrete opcodes it is so, luckily. At
> least we have OPFLAG_NCHANGE, OPFLAG_EPHEM, OPFLAG_SEEKEQ etc -
> they all are <= 15.
Is this variant OK?
+/**
+ * This mask allows to store in p5 operand of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc
+ * opcodes field type alonside with other flags.
+ */
+enum field_type_mask {
+ FIELD_TYPE_MASK = 15
+};
+
extern const char *field_type_strs[];
extern const char *on_conflict_action_strs[];
diff --git a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
index 358b69754..dae05e80f 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c
@@ -2153,13 +2153,13 @@ case OP_Ge: { /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */
} else {
/*
* Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison.
- * 15 is 1111 in a binary form.
- * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4 bits
- * (field_type_MAX == 10), it is enough to 'and'
- * p5 with this constant. Node that all other flags
- * that can be stored in p5 are >= 16.
+ * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4
+ * bits (field_type_MAX == 9), it is enough to
+ * 'and' p5 with field mask. Note that values of
+ * other flags that can be stored in p5 of these
+ * opcodes are >= FIELD_TYPE_MASK.
*/
- enum field_type type = pOp->p5 & 15;
+ enum field_type type = pOp->p5 & FIELD_TYPE_MASK;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-28 9:34 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/8] Eliminate affinity from " Nikita Pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/8] sql: remove SQLITE_ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT define Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-16 14:25 ` n.pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/8] sql: use field type instead of affinity for type_def Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/8] sql: remove numeric affinity Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 9:01 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov
2018-12-29 17:42 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-09 8:26 ` Konstantin Osipov
2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik
2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-01-09 8:20 ` Konstantin Osipov
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/8] sql: replace affinity with field type for func Nikita Pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/8] sql: replace field type with affinity for VDBE runtime Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik
2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/8] sql: replace affinity with field type in struct Expr Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik
2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik
2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code Nikita Pettik
2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik
2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-01-28 16:40 ` n.pettik
2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik [this message]
2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik
2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 8/8] Remove affinity from field definition Nikita Pettik
2019-02-05 19:41 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/8] Eliminate affinity from source code Vladislav Shpilevoy
2019-02-08 13:37 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=239B8EBA-F577-4C9A-BDD9-D76DE10FEB76@tarantool.org \
--to=korablev@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox