From: "n.pettik" <korablev@tarantool.org> To: tarantool-patches@freelists.org Cc: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 19:39:10 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <239B8EBA-F577-4C9A-BDD9-D76DE10FEB76@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1487a209-af7b-5d1f-6fff-fc589782d571@tarantool.org> >>> I propose you to either come up with a better solution or to use one of >>> my solutions: >>> >>> * return AFFINITY_MASK as P5_FIELD_TYPE_MASK, and add a static assertion >>> that P5_FIELD_TYPE_MASK < (1 << bit_count(field_type)). >>> >>> Or write in field_def.h something like this: >>> >>> static_assert(bit_count(field_type) <= 4, >>> "size of enum field_type is used in "\ >>> "VdbeOp.p5 to fit it into 4 bits”); >> To be honest I don’t understand these bit assertions. >> Why can’t we simply check that field_type_MAX <= 15? >> diff --git a/src/box/field_def.c b/src/box/field_def.c >> index b34d2ccd9..1a8074650 100644 >> --- a/src/box/field_def.c >> +++ b/src/box/field_def.c >> @@ -33,6 +33,13 @@ >> #include "trivia/util.h" >> #include "key_def.h" >> +/** >> + * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc >> + * opcodes in vdbe.c. >> + */ >> +static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\ >> + "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5"); >> + >> Also, as you may notice, I placed it to field_def.c >> Seems that field_def.h is used to generate module.h, >> which in turn doesn’t tolerate this kind of assert. > > field_def.h is not copied to module.h entirely. Only > the code between /** \cond public */ and /** \endcond public */. > Please, put this assertion below /** \endcond public */. Didn’t pay attention to that. Fixed: diff --git a/src/box/field_def.c b/src/box/field_def.c index 1a8074650..b34d2ccd9 100644 --- a/src/box/field_def.c +++ b/src/box/field_def.c @@ -33,13 +33,6 @@ #include "trivia/util.h" #include "key_def.h" -/** - * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc - * opcodes in vdbe.c. - */ -static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\ - "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5"); - const char *mp_type_strs[] = { /* .MP_NIL = */ "nil", /* .MP_UINT = */ "unsigned", diff --git a/src/box/field_def.h b/src/box/field_def.h index 93e38ea55..358e35f69 100644 --- a/src/box/field_def.h +++ b/src/box/field_def.h @@ -87,6 +87,13 @@ affinity_type_str(enum affinity_type type); /** \endcond public */ +/** + * For detailed explanation see context of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc + * opcodes in vdbe.c. + */ +static_assert(field_type_MAX <= 15, "values of enum field_type "\ + "should fit into 4 bits of VdbeOp.p5"); + extern const char *field_type_strs[]; extern const char *on_conflict_action_strs[]; >> diff --git a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c >> index 80d2fd0aa..358b69754 100644 >> --- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c >> +++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c >> @@ -2164,17 +2151,24 @@ case OP_Ge: { /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */ >> break; >> } >> } else { >> - /* Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison. */ >> - affinity = pOp->p5 & AFFINITY_MASK; >> - if (affinity>=AFFINITY_INTEGER) { >> + /* >> + * Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison. >> + * 15 is 1111 in a binary form. >> + * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4 bits >> + * (field_type_MAX == 10), it is enough to 'and' >> + * p5 with this constant. Node that all other flags >> + * that can be stored in p5 are >= 16. > > Firstly, as I said in the previous review, field_type_MAX == 9. > Secondly, please, do not use a constant. All of them (15, 111, 10, 16). > Instead of this huge comment full of constants just create a enum > value with an appropriate name, like FIELD_TYPE_MASK = 15, it is > even ok to put this name into field_def.h. Thirdly, not all p5 flags > are >= 16. But for these concrete opcodes it is so, luckily. At > least we have OPFLAG_NCHANGE, OPFLAG_EPHEM, OPFLAG_SEEKEQ etc - > they all are <= 15. Is this variant OK? +/** + * This mask allows to store in p5 operand of OP_Eq, OP_Lt etc + * opcodes field type alonside with other flags. + */ +enum field_type_mask { + FIELD_TYPE_MASK = 15 +}; + extern const char *field_type_strs[]; extern const char *on_conflict_action_strs[]; diff --git a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c index 358b69754..dae05e80f 100644 --- a/src/box/sql/vdbe.c +++ b/src/box/sql/vdbe.c @@ -2153,13 +2153,13 @@ case OP_Ge: { /* same as TK_GE, jump, in1, in3 */ } else { /* * Neither operand is NULL. Do a comparison. - * 15 is 1111 in a binary form. - * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4 bits - * (field_type_MAX == 10), it is enough to 'and' - * p5 with this constant. Node that all other flags - * that can be stored in p5 are >= 16. + * Since all existing types can be fitted in 4 + * bits (field_type_MAX == 9), it is enough to + * 'and' p5 with field mask. Note that values of + * other flags that can be stored in p5 of these + * opcodes are >= FIELD_TYPE_MASK. */ - enum field_type type = pOp->p5 & 15; + enum field_type type = pOp->p5 & FIELD_TYPE_MASK;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 16:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-12-28 9:34 [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/8] Eliminate affinity from " Nikita Pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/8] sql: remove SQLITE_ENABLE_UPDATE_DELETE_LIMIT define Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-16 14:25 ` n.pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/8] sql: use field type instead of affinity for type_def Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 3/8] sql: remove numeric affinity Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 9:01 ` [tarantool-patches] " Konstantin Osipov 2018-12-29 17:42 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-09 8:26 ` Konstantin Osipov 2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik 2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-01-09 8:20 ` Konstantin Osipov 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 4/8] sql: replace affinity with field type for func Nikita Pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 5/8] sql: replace field type with affinity for VDBE runtime Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik 2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 6/8] sql: replace affinity with field type in struct Expr Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik 2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-28 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik 2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code Nikita Pettik 2018-12-29 17:42 ` [tarantool-patches] " Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-16 14:26 ` n.pettik 2019-01-22 15:41 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-01-28 16:40 ` n.pettik 2019-01-30 13:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-01 16:39 ` n.pettik [this message] 2019-02-05 15:08 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-05 17:46 ` n.pettik 2018-12-28 9:34 ` [tarantool-patches] [PATCH 8/8] Remove affinity from field definition Nikita Pettik 2019-02-05 19:41 ` [tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 0/8] Eliminate affinity from source code Vladislav Shpilevoy 2019-02-08 13:37 ` Kirill Yukhin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=239B8EBA-F577-4C9A-BDD9-D76DE10FEB76@tarantool.org \ --to=korablev@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@freelists.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='[tarantool-patches] Re: [PATCH 7/8] sql: clean-up affinity from SQL source code' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox