From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>,
Evgeniy Temirgaleev <e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] dbg: fix lj-stack command for LLDB
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 12:30:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604093052.2221827-2-skaplun@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604093052.2221827-1-skaplun@tarantool.org>
This commit is the follow-up for the commit
593fef813b7d36060e0c1b1ae2df0fbc0d604d1f ("lldb: refactor extension").
`GetValueForExpressionPath()` may produce the empty value for negative
indexes. This leads to incorrect frame unwinding in the LLDB extension
and errors like:
| Failed to execute command `lj-stack`:
| 'Q' format requires 0 <= number <= 18446744073709551615
This patch adds special handling for the negative indices.
---
src/luajit_dbg.py | 49 ++++++++++++++++---
.../debug-extension-tests.py | 26 +++++++---
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/luajit_dbg.py b/src/luajit_dbg.py
index d9196f06..410f0191 100644
--- a/src/luajit_dbg.py
+++ b/src/luajit_dbg.py
@@ -255,15 +255,31 @@ class _GDBDebugger(Debugger):
class _LLDBDebugger(Debugger):
def _lldb_tp_isfp(self, tp):
- return tp.GetBasicType() in [
+ return tp.GetCanonicalType().GetBasicType() in [
lldb.eBasicTypeFloat,
lldb.eBasicTypeDouble,
lldb.eBasicTypeLongDouble
]
+ def _lldb_tp_issigned(self, tp):
+ return tp.GetCanonicalType().GetBasicType() in [
+ lldb.eBasicTypeChar,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeSignedChar,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeShort,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeInt,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeLong,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeLongLong,
+ lldb.eBasicTypeInt128
+ ]
+
def _lldb_value_from_raw(self, raw_value, size, tp):
isfp = self._lldb_tp_isfp(tp)
- pack_flag = '<d' if isfp else '<Q'
+ if isfp:
+ pack_flag = '<d'
+ elif self._lldb_tp_issigned(tp):
+ pack_flag = '<q'
+ else:
+ pack_flag = '<Q'
raw_data = struct.pack(pack_flag, raw_value)
sbdata = lldb.SBData()
sbdata.SetData(
@@ -308,9 +324,24 @@ class _LLDBDebugger(Debugger):
key = int(key)
if type(key) is int:
# Allow array access.
- return lldb.value(
- lldbval.sbvalue.GetValueForExpressionPath('[%i]' % key)
- )
+ if key >= 0:
+ return lldb.value(
+ lldbval.sbvalue.GetValueForExpressionPath('[%i]' % key)
+ )
+ else:
+ # GetValueForExpressionPath doesn't work for
+ # negative offsets.
+ sbvalue = lldbval.sbvalue
+ assert sbvalue.TypeIsPointerType(), \
+ 'attempt to get index of non-pointer type'
+ tp = sbvalue.GetType().GetPointeeType()
+ sz = sbvalue.deref.size
+ addr = sbvalue.GetValueAsUnsigned() + key * sz
+ return lldb.value(self.target.CreateValueFromAddress(
+ '({tp}){addr}'.format(tp=tp, addr=addr),
+ lldb.SBAddress(addr, self.target),
+ tp,
+ ))
elif type(key) is str:
return lldb.value(lldbval.sbvalue.GetChildMemberWithName(key))
raise Exception(TypeError('No item of type %s' % str(type(key))))
@@ -417,8 +448,12 @@ class _LLDBDebugger(Debugger):
# may take the 8 bytes of memory instead of 4, before the
# cast. Construct the value on the fly.
tp = self._dbgtype(typestr)
- is_fp = self._lldb_tp_isfp(tp)
- rawval = float(val.GetValue()) if is_fp else val.GetValueAsUnsigned()
+ if self._lldb_tp_isfp(tp):
+ rawval = float(val.GetValue())
+ elif self._lldb_tp_issigned(tp):
+ rawval = val.GetValueAsSigned()
+ else:
+ rawval = val.GetValueAsUnsigned()
return self._lldb_value_from_raw(rawval, val.GetByteSize(), tp)
def sizeof(self, typestr):
diff --git a/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py b/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
index 61529561..7cb60d84 100644
--- a/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
+++ b/test/tarantool-debugger-tests/debug-extension-tests.py
@@ -186,16 +186,30 @@ class TestLJGC(TestCaseBase):
)
-class TestLJStack(TestCaseBase):
+STACK_RX = (
+ r'-+ Red zone:\s+\d+ slots -+\n'
+ r'(' + RX_ADDR + r'\s+' + RX_FRAME + r' VALUE: nil\n?)*\n'
+ r'-+ Stack:\s+\d+ slots -+\n'
+ r'(' + RX_ADDR + r'(:' + RX_ADDR + r')?\s+' + RX_FRAME + r'.*\n?)+\n'
+)
+
+
+class TestLJStackBase(TestCaseBase):
extension_cmds = 'lj-stack'
location = 'lj_cf_print'
lua_script = 'print(1)'
- pattern = (
- r'-+ Red zone:\s+\d+ slots -+\n'
- r'(' + RX_ADDR + r'\s+' + RX_FRAME + r' VALUE: nil\n?)*\n'
- r'-+ Stack:\s+\d+ slots -+\n'
- r'(' + RX_ADDR + r'(:' + RX_ADDR + r')?\s+' + RX_FRAME + r'.*\n?)+\n'
+ pattern = STACK_RX
+
+
+# Check LLDB correctness for the specific stack.
+class TestLJStackFunc(TestCaseBase):
+ extension_cmds = 'lj-stack'
+ location = 'lj_cf_print'
+ lua_script = (
+ 'local function nop() end\n'
+ 'print()\n'
)
+ pattern = STACK_RX
class TestLJTV(TestCaseBase):
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 9:30 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Introduce dumpers for bytecodes in debuggers Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-04 9:30 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2026-06-05 14:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] dbg: fix lj-stack command for LLDB Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-04 9:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/4] dbg: fix DUALNUM detection " Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 14:57 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 16:01 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-04 9:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/4] dbg: introduce lj-gco command Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 15:02 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-04 9:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/4] dbg: introduce lj-bc, lj-func and lj-proto dumpers Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 15:07 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 16:10 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 14:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/4] Introduce dumpers for bytecodes in debuggers Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2026-06-05 16:03 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/5] dbg: update help for the lj-arch command Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604093052.2221827-2-skaplun@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=e.temirgaleev@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/4] dbg: fix lj-stack command for LLDB' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox