From: Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, imun@tarantool.org,
skaplun@tarantool.org, m.shishatskiy@tarantool.org
Subject: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: adapt test checking tail calls debug info
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:40:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210930144056.1679061-1-m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org> (raw)
LuaJIT does not provide information about tail calls,
unlike Lua does. getfenv() behavior for this test set is also different in
LuaJIT, because tail calls do not provide additional call frame.
Closes tarantool/tarantool#5702
Part of tarantool/tarantool#5845
Part of tarantool/tarantool#4473
---
GitHub branch: https://github.com/tarantool/luajit/tree/fckxorg/gh-5702-adapt-getfenv-getinfo-PUC-Rio
Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5702
See also https://luajit.org/status.html
test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/db.lua | 61 +++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/db.lua b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/db.lua
index 56f59ea8..a94f07ab 100644
--- a/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/db.lua
+++ b/test/PUC-Rio-Lua-5.1-tests/db.lua
@@ -378,21 +378,22 @@ if jit_is_enabled then
jit.on()
end
-
-- tests for tail calls
+-- LuaJIT does not provide information about tail calls,
+-- unlike Lua does. See also https://luajit.org/status.html.
+-- getfenv() behavior is also different here, because tail calls
+-- do not provide additional call frame for LuaJIT.
+-- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5702.
+-- This function is adapted to LuaJIT behavior.
local function f (x)
if x then
assert(debug.getinfo(1, "S").what == "Lua")
local tail = debug.getinfo(2)
- assert(not pcall(getfenv, 3))
- assert(tail.what == "tail" and tail.short_src == "(tail call)" and
- tail.linedefined == -1 and tail.func == nil)
- assert(debug.getinfo(3, "f").func == g1)
+ assert(pcall(getfenv, 3))
+ assert(tail.what == "Lua" and tail.linedefined == 403 and tail.func == g1)
+ -- End of single assert
assert(getfenv(3))
- assert(debug.getinfo(4, "S").what == "tail")
- assert(not pcall(getfenv, 5))
- assert(debug.getinfo(5, "S").what == "main")
- assert(getfenv(5))
+ assert(debug.getinfo(3, "S").what == "main")
print"+"
end
end
@@ -403,43 +404,33 @@ function g1(x) g(x) end
local function h (x) local f=g1; return f(x) end
--- FIXME: LuaJIT does not provide information about tail calls,
--- unlike Lua does. See also https://luajit.org/status.html.
--- getfenv() behaviour is also different here, because tail calls
--- do not provide additional call frame for LuaJIT and level
--- number should be changed.
--- Test is disabled for LuaJIT.
--- See also https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5702.
--- h(true)
+-- This fucntions is adapted to LuaJIT behavior. See the comment above.
+h(true)
local b = {}
--- FIXME: Behavior is different for LuaJIT. See the comment above.
--- Test is disabled for LuaJIT.
--- debug.sethook(function (e) table.insert(b, e) end, "cr")
--- h(false)
--- debug.sethook()
-local res = {"return", -- first return (from sethook)
- "call", "call", "call", "call",
- "return", "tail return", "return", "tail return",
- "call", -- last call (to sethook)
+debug.sethook(function (e) table.insert(b, e) end, "cr")
+-- This fucntions is adapted to LuaJIT behavior. See the comment above.
+h(false)
+debug.sethook()
+-- This chunk is adapted to LuaJIT behavior. See the comment above.
+local res = {"call", -- first return (from sethook)
+ "call", "call", "call", "return",
+ "return", "call"
}
--- FIXME: Behavior is different for LuaJIT. See the comment above.
--- Test is disabled for LuaJIT.
--- for _, k in ipairs(res) do assert(k == table.remove(b, 1)) end
+for _, k in ipairs(res) do assert(k == table.remove(b, 1)) end
-lim = 30000
+-- This chunk is adapted to LuaJIT behavior. See the comment above.
+lim = 2
local function foo (x)
if x==0 then
- assert(debug.getinfo(lim+2).what == "main")
- for i=2,lim do assert(debug.getinfo(i, "S").what == "tail") end
+ assert(debug.getinfo(lim + 1,"S").what == "main")
+ assert(debug.getinfo(lim, "S").what == "main")
else return foo(x-1)
end
end
--- FIXME: Behavior is different for LuaJIT.
--- See the comment to `h()` above. Test is disabled for LuaJIT.
--- foo(lim)
+foo(lim)
print"+"
--
2.33.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 14:40 Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-10-11 15:03 ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-10-13 12:37 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit v2] " Maxim Kokryashkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-06-01 16:21 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2022-06-20 12:47 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] " Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210930144056.1679061-1-m.kokryashkin@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imun@tarantool.org \
--cc=m.shishatskiy@tarantool.org \
--cc=max.kokryashkin@gmail.com \
--cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit] test: adapt test checking tail calls debug info' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox