From: Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/3] sql: replace MEM-type flags by enum mem_type
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:56:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210524105630.GA82983@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3ac2493-847e-a3b3-751c-704d1a75063f@tarantool.org>
Hi! Thank you for the review! My answers and diff below.
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 08:59:14PM +0200, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> Hi! Thanks for the fixes!
>
> See 2 small comments below.
>
> > diff --git a/src/box/sql/mem.c b/src/box/sql/mem.c
> > index b6ff6397f..f7788021d 100644
> > --- a/src/box/sql/mem.c
> > +++ b/src/box/sql/mem.c
> > @@ -1155,11 +1214,11 @@ mem_get_str0(const struct Mem *mem, const char **s)
> > int
> > mem_get_bin(const struct Mem *mem, const char **s)
> > {
> > - if ((mem->flags & MEM_Str) != 0) {
> > + if (mem->type == MEM_TYPE_STR) {
> > *s = mem->n > 0 ? mem->z : NULL;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > - if ((mem->flags & MEM_Blob) == 0 || (mem->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0)
> > + if (mem->type != MEM_TYPE_BIN || (mem->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0)
> > return -1;
>
> 1. AFAIR, it is not possible to have MEM_Zero for non-bin. Which makes
> the second condition unreachable, right? The same in mem_len().
>
It is true that it should be not possible to have MEM_Zero flag for
non-VARBINARY value. However, here it is checked that the value is VARBINARY
and if it is, the flag is checked. I think there is nothing wrong here.
Still, In mem_len() I removed one condition and added assert instead.
> > *s = mem->z;
> > return 0;
> > @@ -1644,14 +1717,15 @@ mem_bit_not(const struct Mem *mem, struct Mem *result)
> > return -1;
> > }
> > result->u.i = ~i;
> > - result->flags = result->u.i < 0 ? MEM_Int : MEM_UInt;
> > + result->type = result->u.i < 0 ? MEM_TYPE_INT : MEM_TYPE_UINT;
> > + assert(result->flags == 0);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > int
> > mem_cmp_bool(const struct Mem *a, const struct Mem *b, int *result)
> > {
> > - if ((a->flags & b->flags & MEM_Bool) == 0)
> > + if (a->type != MEM_TYPE_BOOL || b->type != MEM_TYPE_BOOL)
>
> 2. You could leave the old way so as to avoid || (branching).
>
Thanks, fixed. Also fixed in one more place.
> > return -1;
> > if (a->u.b == b->u.b)
> > *result = 0;
Diff:
diff --git a/src/box/sql/mem.c b/src/box/sql/mem.c
index f7788021d..1bd70c37f 100644
--- a/src/box/sql/mem.c
+++ b/src/box/sql/mem.c
@@ -1229,7 +1229,8 @@ mem_len(const struct Mem *mem, uint32_t *len)
{
if (!mem_is_bytes(mem))
return -1;
- if (mem->type == MEM_TYPE_BIN && (mem->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0)
+ assert((mem->flags & MEM_Zero) == 0 || mem->type == MEM_TYPE_BIN);
+ if ((mem->flags & MEM_Zero) != 0)
*len = mem->n + mem->u.nZero;
else
*len = mem->n;
@@ -1725,7 +1726,7 @@ mem_bit_not(const struct Mem *mem, struct Mem *result)
int
mem_cmp_bool(const struct Mem *a, const struct Mem *b, int *result)
{
- if (a->type != MEM_TYPE_BOOL || b->type != MEM_TYPE_BOOL)
+ if ((a->type & b->type & MEM_TYPE_BOOL) == 0)
return -1;
if (a->u.b == b->u.b)
*result = 0;
@@ -2345,7 +2346,7 @@ sqlMemCompare(const Mem * pMem1, const Mem * pMem2, const struct coll * pColl)
(int)(type1 == MEM_TYPE_NULL);
if (((type1 | type2) & MEM_TYPE_BOOL) != 0) {
- if (type1 == MEM_TYPE_BOOL && type2 == MEM_TYPE_BOOL) {
+ if ((type1 & type2 & MEM_TYPE_BOOL) != 0) {
if (pMem1->u.b == pMem2->u.b)
return 0;
if (pMem1->u.b)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 16:55 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Replace " Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-27 16:55 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/3] sql: replace " Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-04-29 21:09 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-17 12:18 ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-17 12:34 ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-21 18:59 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-24 10:56 ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-05-24 15:26 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-25 11:13 ` Mergen Imeev via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-25 21:33 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/3] Replace " Vladislav Shpilevoy via Tarantool-patches
2021-05-26 8:06 ` Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210524105630.GA82983@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imeevma@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 3/3] sql: replace MEM-type flags by enum mem_type' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox