Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/5] test: fix warnings found with luacheck in misclib*
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:29:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210216152956.GM5448@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210214191626.GF9361@root>

Sergey,

Thanks for the review!

On 14.02.21, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> Hi, Igor!
> 
> Thanks for the patch!
> 
> Looks like I was late for the ball and you got two LGTMs, but here’s my

No, you were not!

> two cents on the matter, because I've been mentioned. Feel free to
> ignore my nitpicks.
> 
> LGTM, except two nitpicks below.

Added your tag:
| Reviewed-by: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>

> 
> On 02.02.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> > Since the regular static analysis has not been enabled for the test
> > chunks in LuaJIT repository yet, the tests for recently implemented
> > features still produce luacheck warnings.
> > 
> > The most of the issues are fixed in scope of the commit
> > 8fc103fb1a21c28185a1942e75d8d9485e3aade7 ('test: fix warnings spotted by
> > luacheck') and this patch fixes the remaining ones.
> > 
> > Fixes tarantool/tarantool#5631
> 
> Nit: Looks like 'Closes' or even 'Part of' (considering the next patch),
> not 'Fixes'.

Why? Sergey pointed out the warnings. The sources and the related
warnings are *fixed*. So 'Fixes' looks the most suitable here.

> Also, After this patch there are tons of misc-related warnings
> by the luacheсk without config. So, I think that this patch should be
> squashed with the next one.

Yes, these changes are not atomic. I can simply reorder the patches, if
you insist, but I definitely don't want to squash them into a single
one. The reason is that one is about "enabling" the regular check for
LuaJIT-related sources (#5470), but as a result of the applying
metrics-related series, the introduced chunks have broken luacheck
again. The new warnings are reported in a separate issue (#5631).

> Feel free to ignore.
> 
> > Part of tarantool/tarantool#4862
> > Part of tarantool/tarantool#5470
> > Follows up tarantool/tarantool#5187
> > 
> > Reported-by: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org>
> > ---
> >  .../misclib-getmetrics-capi.test.lua          | 22 ++++++---------
> >  .../misclib-getmetrics-lapi.test.lua          | 28 +++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > 

<snipped>

> > diff --git a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-getmetrics-lapi.test.lua b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-getmetrics-lapi.test.lua
> > index 959293d..d54caac 100755
> > --- a/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-getmetrics-lapi.test.lua
> > +++ b/test/tarantool-tests/misclib-getmetrics-lapi.test.lua

<snipped>

> > @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ test:test("strhash", function(subtest)
> >      assert(new_metrics.strhash_miss - old_metrics.strhash_miss == 0)
> >      old_metrics = new_metrics
> >  
> > -    local str2 = "new".."string"
> > +    local _ = "new".."string"
> 
> Nit: this `local` is redundant.
> Feel free to ignore.

There is little sense in storing both strings into a separate local
slots, but the code looks kinda "consistent".

Ignoring.

> 
> >  
> >      new_metrics = misc.getmetrics()
> >      assert(new_metrics.strhash_hit - old_metrics.strhash_hit == 19)
> > -- 
> > 2.25.0
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Sergey Kaplun

-- 
Best regards,
IM

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 20:57 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/5] Self-sufficient LuaJIT testing environment Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/5] build: preserve the original build system Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:53   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:56     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 11:38   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 12:47     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 14:45       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:28         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-10  9:35           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/5] build: replace GNU Make with CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:53   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:56     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 13:55       ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:09         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-11 19:23   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:28     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-18  9:56       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-20 19:18         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-27 10:48           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 18:18             ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-13  3:47   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:32     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/5] test: run LuaJIT tests via CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:05   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 16:29     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09  8:16       ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09  8:43         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 13:59           ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:10             ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 18:48   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-19 19:04     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-27 13:50       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 18:18         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/5] test: fix warnings found with luacheck in misclib* Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
     [not found]   ` <012f01d6fe1a$a2aa6890$e7ff39b0$@tarantool.org>
2021-02-08 15:57     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
     [not found]     ` <2c495492-50f4-acfd-ad66-2cb44abb5fa1@tarantool.org>
2021-02-08 15:40       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:58       ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 19:16   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:29     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-02-16 16:36       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 5/5] test: run luacheck static analysis via CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:52   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:57     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 19:32   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-19 19:14     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 22:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/5] Self-sufficient LuaJIT testing environment Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210216152956.GM5448@tarantool.org \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/5] test: fix warnings found with luacheck in misclib*' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox