Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 5/5] test: run luacheck static analysis via CMake
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 22:32:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210214193244.GG9361@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7057011c43d41adab30dbd13621570418064d38d.1612291495.git.imun@tarantool.org>

Hi, Igor!

Thanks for the patch!
Nice to see all LuaJIT-related stuff inside its repo!

LGTM, except few questions below.

On 02.02.21, Igor Munkin wrote:
> This patch introduces a separate target to run luacheck against all Lua
> chunks within LuaJIT repository except those explicitly ignored in
> .luacheckrc. There is also a single additional change over the 'luajit'
> std defaults: to suppress all false positives related to <misc>

Typo: defaults are standards already. 'std' or 'defatults' is redundant
here.

> namespace introduced in 5a61e1ab54b5c66bfebd836db1ac47996611e065 ('misc:
> add C and Lua API for platform metrics'), this name is added to
> <read_globals> list.
> 
> All Lua sources originally inherited from LuaJIT vanilla repository are
> ignored, to leave them coherent with the upstream.
> 
> The new target is a dependency for the root <test> target.
> 

Nit: Looks like you should mention tarantool/tarantool#5631 here.
Or squash it with the previous patch.
See rationale here [1].
Feel free to ignore.

> Part of tarantool/tarantool#4862
> Part of tarantool/tarantool#5470
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org>
> ---
>  .gitignore          |  1 +
>  .luacheckrc         | 11 +++++++++++
>  test/CMakeLists.txt | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 .luacheckrc
> 
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> index 35d2580..7902547 100644
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Makefile

<snipped>

> diff --git a/.luacheckrc b/.luacheckrc
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0a5d001
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.luacheckrc
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@

<snipped>

> diff --git a/test/CMakeLists.txt b/test/CMakeLists.txt
> index f05dd90..c89efc2 100644
> --- a/test/CMakeLists.txt
> +++ b/test/CMakeLists.txt
> @@ -3,6 +3,36 @@
>  # See the rationale in the root CMakeLists.txt.
>  cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1 FATAL_ERROR)

Side note: Why this version?

>  
> +find_program(LUACHECK luacheck)
> +if(LUACHECK)
> +  set(LUACHECK_RC ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/.luacheckrc)
> +  set(LUACHECK_OK ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/luacheck.ok)
> +  file(GLOB_RECURSE LUACHECK_DEPS ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/*.lua)
> +  add_custom_command(
> +    COMMENT "Running luacheck static analysis"
> +    OUTPUT ${LUACHECK_OK}
> +    DEPENDS ${LUACHECK} ${LUACHECK_RC} ${LUACHECK_DEPS}

Why are `${LUACHECK}` and `${LUACHECK_RC}` are mentioned?

> +    COMMAND
> +      ${LUACHECK} ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}
> +        --codes
> +        --config ${LUACHECK_RC}
> +      && touch ${LUACHECK_OK}
> +      # XXX: Filenames in .luacheckrc are considered relative to
> +      # the working directory, hence luacheck should be run in the
> +      # project root directory.
> +      WORKING_DIRECTORY ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}
> +  )

<snipped>

> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 

[1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/tarantool-patches/20210214191626.GF9361@root/T/#md50dbe78c52523ca739f2751d96c61edcf2e7a36

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-14 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02 20:57 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/5] Self-sufficient LuaJIT testing environment Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 1/5] build: preserve the original build system Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:53   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:56     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 11:38   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 12:47     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 14:45       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:28         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-10  9:35           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 2/5] build: replace GNU Make with CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:53   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:56     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 13:55       ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:09         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-11 19:23   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:28     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-18  9:56       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-20 19:18         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-27 10:48           ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 18:18             ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-13  3:47   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:32     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 3/5] test: run LuaJIT tests via CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:05   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 16:29     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09  8:16       ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09  8:43         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 13:59           ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-09 15:10             ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 18:48   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-19 19:04     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-27 13:50       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 18:18         ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 4/5] test: fix warnings found with luacheck in misclib* Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
     [not found]   ` <012f01d6fe1a$a2aa6890$e7ff39b0$@tarantool.org>
     [not found]     ` <2c495492-50f4-acfd-ad66-2cb44abb5fa1@tarantool.org>
2021-02-08 15:40       ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:58       ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:57     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 19:16   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 15:29     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-16 16:36       ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-02 20:57 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 5/5] test: run luacheck static analysis via CMake Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-04 22:52   ` Timur Safin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-08 15:57     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-14 19:32   ` Sergey Kaplun via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-02-19 19:14     ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches
2021-02-28 22:04 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 0/5] Self-sufficient LuaJIT testing environment Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210214193244.GG9361@root \
    --to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH luajit 5/5] test: run luacheck static analysis via CMake' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox