From: Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
To: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] luacheck: fix warnings in test/box
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 23:32:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210115203233.GB5460@tarantool.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ceeb4d04-27f5-1e0b-2940-55f8ff3c751a@tarantool.org>
Sergey,
Even I'm a bit late (Kirill is the fastest hand in the wild west^W^W
Tarantool), I have a single nit regarding Serge question.
On 15.01.21, Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches wrote:
> Thanks for review!
>
> On 15.01.2021 15:39, Serge Petrenko wrote:
> >
<snipped>
> >> diff --git a/test/box/gh-5304-insert_during_recovery.lua
> >> b/test/box/gh-5304-insert_during_recovery.lua
> >> index ac6eef342..c8b6c5cfb 100644
> >> --- a/test/box/gh-5304-insert_during_recovery.lua
> >> +++ b/test/box/gh-5304-insert_during_recovery.lua
> >> @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
> >> #!/usr/bin/env tarantool
> >> -function none(old_space, new_space)
> >> +local function none(old_space, new_space) -- luacheck: ignore
> >
> > What's "luacheck: ignore" comment for? Haven't you fixed the warning
> > already by introducing `local` ?
> >
> There are two warnings here. First one about global scope, that was
> fixed with "local" and second one
>
> about unused parameters, that was suppressed by "luacheck: ignore".
AFAICS there is a specific ignore reason for inline suppressions such as
"no unused args" that is used in other Lua sources repo-wide (just grep for
it). You can also see other available inline reasons here[1].
>
> >> end
<snipped>
> >
[1]: https://luacheck.readthedocs.io/en/stable/inline.html
--
Best regards,
IM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 11:22 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] Fix new luacheck warnings in test/box-tap and test/box Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 11:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] luacheck: fix warnings in test/box Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 12:39 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 12:54 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 13:02 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 20:32 ` Igor Munkin via Tarantool-patches [this message]
2021-01-15 11:22 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2/2] luacheck: fix warnings in test/box-tap Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 12:40 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 12:56 ` Sergey Bronnikov via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 13:03 ` Serge Petrenko via Tarantool-patches
2021-01-15 14:30 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 0/2] Fix new luacheck warnings in test/box-tap and test/box Kirill Yukhin via Tarantool-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210115203233.GB5460@tarantool.org \
--to=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=imun@tarantool.org \
--cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 1/2] luacheck: fix warnings in test/box' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox