Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org>
Cc: Mons Anderson <v.perepelitsa@corp.mail.ru>,
	tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/3] cfg: support symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 23:02:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201221200226.GB81750@grain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <619b78fe-d559-7eb6-5e28-e239ed7f6e46@tarantool.org>

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:48:04PM +0100, Vladislav Shpilevoy wrote:
> > +
> > +	if (lua_isnumber(tarantool_L, -1))
> > +		quorum = (int)lua_tonumber(tarantool_L, -1);
> 
> 1. There is a small issue:
> 
> tarantool> box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum='4294967297'}
> 2020-12-21 18:33:16.015 [47366] main/103/interactive I> set 'replication_synchro_quorum' configuration option to "4294967297"

Actually nope. When we pass this value it is treated
as a plain number and cfg_geti trims it :(

Here is a master branch output

 | tarantool> box.cfg{replication_synchro_quorum=4294967297}
 | ...
 | 2020-12-21 22:59:00.614 [176552] main/103/interactive I> set 'replication_synchro_quorum' configuration option to 4294967297

Note that on master branch I have to pass real numebr not string,
but issue is the same...

Need to think how to deal with it.

> > +		int value = MAX(1, replicaset.registered_count);
> > +		quorum = box_eval_replication_synchro_quorum(value);
> > +		if (quorum <= 0 || quorum >= VCLOCK_MAX)
> > +			panic("failed to eval replication_synchro_quorum");
> 
> 2. This check better be below. Because the numeric value also was
> validated, right?

True, will update.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-21 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-14 11:39 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 0/3] qsync: evaluate replication_synchro_quorum dynamically Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-14 11:39 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 1/3] cfg: add cfg_isnumber helper Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-14 11:39 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/3] cfg: support symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-16 13:21   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-12-16 13:35     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-17 23:17   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-18  7:25     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-20 17:01       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-20 18:28         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-21 17:48   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-21 17:49     ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-21 20:02     ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2020-12-21 20:12       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-14 11:39 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 3/3] test: add replication/gh-5446-qsync-eval-quorum.test.lua Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-16 13:25   ` Serge Petrenko
2020-12-17 23:18   ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-18  8:14     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-20 17:01       ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-12-20 18:27         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2020-12-21 16:05         ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201221200226.GB81750@grain \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --cc=v.perepelitsa@corp.mail.ru \
    --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4 2/3] cfg: support symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox