From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> To: Serge Petrenko <sergepetrenko@tarantool.org> Cc: tml <tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org>, Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:01:48 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201120110148.GA875895@grain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <2cb79b7d-b2f4-fc42-b707-31e109b0ff69@tarantool.org> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:06:55PM +0300, Serge Petrenko wrote: > > IMO it'd be better to name the new function somewhat similar to > `box_update_replication_synchro_quorum` and leave it in box.cc > > > This way you avoid adding 2 new dependencies to replication.cc > and leave all the code dealing with reconfiguration at one place. > > Besides, replication.cc already depends on box, so it won't be a problem > to call update_replication_synchro_quorum there. Yeah, I don't mind, thanks! > Load_cfg.lua will say something similar, when replication_synchro_quorum is > a number: > > ``` > > log.info("set '%s' configuration option to %s", key, > json.encode(val)) > > ``` > > So this say_info belongs to the trigger you invoke on replica > register/unregister. It will say "set ... to n+2/1" while we're printing the evaluated integer value which is more informative.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 11:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-19 19:40 [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 0/4] qsync: evaluate replication_synchro_quorum dynamically Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 1/4] cfg: add cfg_isnumber helper Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 9:53 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 10:06 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 11:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message] 2020-11-20 11:39 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 11:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-19 19:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 3/4] cfg: prepare symbolic evaluation of replication_synchro_quorum Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 10:32 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 11:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 11:56 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 12:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-26 14:38 ` Mons Anderson 2020-11-26 14:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-26 16:01 ` Mons Anderson 2020-11-19 19:41 ` [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 4/4] qsync: allow to specify replication_synchro_quorum as a formula Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 10:50 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 12:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov 2020-11-20 12:41 ` Serge Petrenko 2020-11-20 15:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201120110148.GA875895@grain \ --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \ --cc=sergepetrenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [RFC 2/4] qsync: move synchro quorum update to separate routine' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox