From: Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org>
To: Timur Safin <tsafin@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 1/4] module api: export box_tuple_validate
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:38:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201015213806.gfujc6qpd4utizf3@tkn_work_nb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1e4eeb9131f548b7c43fbe205dedc04a8aaf594.1602629628.git.tsafin@tarantool.org>
LGTM for the patch.
Just few notes, feel free to ignore.
> +/*
> + * Validate tuple with format of single boolean field
> + */
Nits: /* -> /**; period at the end.
> +static int
> +test_tuple_validate_formatted(lua_State *L)
> +{
> + int valid = 0;
> + box_tuple_t *tuple = luaT_istuple(L, -1);
> +
> + if (tuple != NULL) {
> + uint32_t fields[] = { 0 };
> + uint32_t types[] = { FIELD_TYPE_BOOLEAN };
> + box_key_def_t *key_defs[] = {
> + box_key_def_new(fields, types, 1)
> + };
> + assert(key_defs[0] != NULL);
> + struct tuple_format *format =
> + box_tuple_format_new(key_defs, 1);
> + assert(format);
> +
> + valid = box_tuple_validate(tuple, format) == 0;
Nit: I would call box_tuple_format_unref() and box_key_def_delete().
I know, it is just test, so you can ignore this comment. I'm personally
a bit afraid of using bad patterns without a proper comment even in
tests. What if someone will copy it somewhere..?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-15 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 23:01 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 0/4] module api: extend for external merger Lua module Timur Safin
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 1/4] module api: export box_tuple_validate Timur Safin
2020-10-15 21:38 ` Alexander Turenko [this message]
2020-10-15 21:47 ` Timur Safin
2020-10-15 22:03 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 2/4] module api: export box_key_def_dup Timur Safin
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 3/4] module api: introduced luaT_toibuf instead of luaL_checkibuf Timur Safin
2020-10-14 3:50 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 21:07 ` Timur Safin
2020-10-15 22:04 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-10-13 23:01 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 4/4] module api: box_ibuf_* wrappers Timur Safin
2020-10-14 3:31 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 21:35 ` Timur Safin
2020-10-15 21:42 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 21:44 ` Timur Safin
2020-10-15 21:52 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 22:07 ` Vladislav Shpilevoy
2020-10-15 22:20 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 22:27 ` Timur Safin
2020-10-15 22:47 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 22:37 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 22:48 ` Alexander Turenko
2020-10-15 22:39 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4.1] " Timur Safin
2020-10-16 6:10 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 0/4] module api: extend for external merger Lua module Alexander Turenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201015213806.gfujc6qpd4utizf3@tkn_work_nb \
--to=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \
--cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
--cc=tsafin@tarantool.org \
--cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \
--subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 2.X v4 1/4] module api: export box_tuple_validate' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox