* [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] key_def: support composite types extraction
@ 2020-10-13 12:02 Ilya Kosarev
2020-10-13 13:22 ` Kirill Yukhin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Kosarev @ 2020-10-13 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kyukhin; +Cc: tarantool-patches, alexander.turenko
key_def didn't support key definitions with array, map, varbinary & any
fields. Thus they couldn't be extracted with
key_def_object:extract_key(). Since the restriction existed due to
impossibility of such types comparison, this patch removes the
restriction for the fields extraction and only leaves it for
comparison.
Closes #4538
---
Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/i.kosarev/gh-4538-key_def-extract-arrays
Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4538
@ChangeLog:
* Composite types extraction is now supported in key_def (gh-4538).
Changes in v2:
- type check is now only performed on key_def creation
- more tests added
Changes in v3:
- to avoid saving incomparable type it is now being determined at the error path again
- verbosed some tests peculiar properties
Changes in v4:
- Added the assert on the incomparability of type at the error path
- Added a comment on setting key_def compare functions to NULL
src/box/key_def.h | 20 +++++++++
src/box/lua/key_def.c | 30 ++++++++------
src/box/tuple_compare.cc | 12 ++++++
test/box-tap/key_def.test.lua | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/box/key_def.h b/src/box/key_def.h
index f4d9e76f2..9f358687a 100644
--- a/src/box/key_def.h
+++ b/src/box/key_def.h
@@ -515,6 +515,24 @@ key_def_has_collation(const struct key_def *key_def)
return false;
}
+/**
+ * Return the first field type which can't be compared if @a key_def
+ * has such. Otherwise return field_type_MAX value.
+ */
+static inline enum field_type
+key_def_incomparable_type(const struct key_def *key_def)
+{
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < key_def->part_count; ++i) {
+ if (key_def->parts[i].type == FIELD_TYPE_ANY ||
+ key_def->parts[i].type == FIELD_TYPE_ARRAY ||
+ key_def->parts[i].type == FIELD_TYPE_MAP) {
+ /* Tuple comparators don't support these types. */
+ return key_def->parts[i].type;
+ }
+ }
+ return field_type_MAX;
+}
+
/**
* @brief Checks if \a field_type (MsgPack) is compatible \a type (KeyDef).
* @param type KeyDef type
@@ -650,6 +668,7 @@ tuple_compare(struct tuple *tuple_a, hint_t tuple_a_hint,
struct tuple *tuple_b, hint_t tuple_b_hint,
struct key_def *key_def)
{
+ assert(key_def->tuple_compare != NULL);
return key_def->tuple_compare(tuple_a, tuple_a_hint,
tuple_b, tuple_b_hint, key_def);
}
@@ -672,6 +691,7 @@ tuple_compare_with_key(struct tuple *tuple, hint_t tuple_hint,
const char *key, uint32_t part_count,
hint_t key_hint, struct key_def *key_def)
{
+ assert(key_def->tuple_compare_with_key != NULL);
return key_def->tuple_compare_with_key(tuple, tuple_hint, key,
part_count, key_hint, key_def);
}
diff --git a/src/box/lua/key_def.c b/src/box/lua/key_def.c
index 1a99fab63..a781aeff9 100644
--- a/src/box/lua/key_def.c
+++ b/src/box/lua/key_def.c
@@ -127,21 +127,9 @@ luaT_key_def_set_part(struct lua_State *L, struct key_part_def *part,
const char *type_name = lua_tolstring(L, -1, &type_len);
lua_pop(L, 1);
part->type = field_type_by_name(type_name, type_len);
- switch (part->type) {
- case FIELD_TYPE_ANY:
- case FIELD_TYPE_VARBINARY:
- case FIELD_TYPE_ARRAY:
- case FIELD_TYPE_MAP:
- /* Tuple comparators don't support these types. */
- diag_set(IllegalParams, "Unsupported field type: %s",
- type_name);
- return -1;
- case field_type_MAX:
+ if (part->type == field_type_MAX) {
diag_set(IllegalParams, "Unknown field type: %s", type_name);
return -1;
- default:
- /* Pass though. */
- break;
}
/* Set part->is_nullable and part->nullable_action. */
@@ -316,6 +304,14 @@ lbox_key_def_compare(struct lua_State *L)
"compare(tuple_a, tuple_b)");
}
+ if (key_def->tuple_compare == NULL) {
+ enum field_type type = key_def_incomparable_type(key_def);
+ assert(type != field_type_MAX);
+ diag_set(IllegalParams, "Unsupported field type: %s",
+ field_type_strs[type]);
+ return luaT_error(L);
+ }
+
struct tuple *tuple_a, *tuple_b;
if ((tuple_a = luaT_key_def_check_tuple(L, key_def, 2)) == NULL)
return luaT_error(L);
@@ -349,6 +345,14 @@ lbox_key_def_compare_with_key(struct lua_State *L)
"compare_with_key(tuple, key)");
}
+ if (key_def->tuple_compare_with_key == NULL) {
+ enum field_type type = key_def_incomparable_type(key_def);
+ assert(type != field_type_MAX);
+ diag_set(IllegalParams, "Unsupported field type: %s",
+ field_type_strs[type]);
+ return luaT_error(L);
+ }
+
struct tuple *tuple = luaT_key_def_check_tuple(L, key_def, 2);
if (tuple == NULL)
return luaT_error(L);
diff --git a/src/box/tuple_compare.cc b/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
index d059c709f..0946d77f8 100644
--- a/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
+++ b/src/box/tuple_compare.cc
@@ -2081,5 +2081,17 @@ key_def_set_compare_func(struct key_def *def)
key_def_set_compare_func_json<false, false>(def);
}
}
+ /*
+ * We are setting compare functions to NULL in case the key_def
+ * contains non-comparable type. Thus in case we later discover
+ * compare function equal to NULL we assume that the key_def
+ * contains incomparable type. It has to be revised if the
+ * new case where we are setting compare functions to NULL
+ * appears.
+ */
+ if (key_def_incomparable_type(def) != field_type_MAX) {
+ def->tuple_compare = NULL;
+ def->tuple_compare_with_key = NULL;
+ }
key_def_set_hint_func(def);
}
diff --git a/test/box-tap/key_def.test.lua b/test/box-tap/key_def.test.lua
index 3a4aad687..2a311b75e 100755
--- a/test/box-tap/key_def.test.lua
+++ b/test/box-tap/key_def.test.lua
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ end
-- Case: extract_key().
test:test('extract_key()', function(test)
- test:plan(13)
+ test:plan(14)
local key_def_a = key_def_lib.new({
{type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 1},
@@ -245,6 +245,18 @@ test:test('extract_key()', function(test)
}):extract_key({{a = {b = 'foo'}}}):totable()
test:is_deeply(res, {'foo'}, 'JSON path (table argument)')
+ -- Composite types.
+ local tuple = {{{key = 'aa', data = 'aaaa'},
+ {key = 'ab', data = 'aabb'},
+ {key = 'bb', data = 'bbbb'}}, box.NULL,
+ {a = 5, b = 6}}
+ local res = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'array', fieldno = 1},
+ {type = 'map', fieldno = 2, is_nullable = true},
+ {type = 'any', fieldno = 3},
+ }):extract_key(tuple):totable()
+ test:is_deeply(res, tuple, 'Composite types')
+
-- A key def has a **nullable** part with a field that is over
-- a tuple size.
--
@@ -335,7 +347,7 @@ end)
-- Case: compare().
test:test('compare()', function(test)
- test:plan(8)
+ test:plan(9)
local key_def_a = key_def_lib.new({
{type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 1},
@@ -365,11 +377,19 @@ test:test('compare()', function(test)
'case 3: less (table argument)')
test:is(key_def_b:compare(tuple_a:totable(), tuple_c:totable()), 0,
'case 4: equal (table argument)')
+
+ local cmp_err = 'Unsupported field type: array'
+ local key_def = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'string', fieldno = 1},
+ {type = 'array', fieldno = 2, is_nullable = true},
+ })
+ local ok, err = pcall(key_def.compare, key_def, {'aa', {}}, {'bb', box.NULL})
+ test:is_deeply({ok, tostring(err)}, {false, cmp_err}, 'no composite comparison')
end)
-- Case: compare_with_key().
test:test('compare_with_key()', function(test)
- test:plan(2)
+ test:plan(3)
local key_def_b = key_def_lib.new({
{type = 'number', fieldno = 2},
@@ -382,11 +402,19 @@ test:test('compare_with_key()', function(test)
local key = box.tuple.new({1, 22})
test:is(key_def_b:compare_with_key(tuple_a, key), 0, 'tuple')
+
+ local cmp_err = 'Unsupported field type: map'
+ local key_def = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'string', fieldno = 1},
+ {type = 'map', fieldno = 2},
+ })
+ local ok, err = pcall(key_def.compare_with_key, key_def, {'aa', {}}, {'bb', box.NULL})
+ test:is_deeply({ok, tostring(err)}, {false, cmp_err}, 'no composite comparison')
end)
-- Case: totable().
test:test('totable()', function(test)
- test:plan(2)
+ test:plan(3)
local parts_a = {
{type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 1}
@@ -395,14 +423,23 @@ test:test('totable()', function(test)
{type = 'number', fieldno = 2},
{type = 'number', fieldno = 3},
}
+ local parts_composite = {
+ {type = 'number', fieldno = 2},
+ {type = 'array', fieldno = 3},
+ {type = 'map', fieldno = 4, is_nullable = true},
+ }
local key_def_a = key_def_lib.new(parts_a)
local key_def_b = key_def_lib.new(parts_b)
+ local key_def_composite = key_def_lib.new(parts_composite)
local exp = set_key_part_defaults(parts_a)
test:is_deeply(key_def_a:totable(), exp, 'case 1')
local exp = set_key_part_defaults(parts_b)
test:is_deeply(key_def_b:totable(), exp, 'case 2')
+
+ local exp = set_key_part_defaults(parts_composite)
+ test:is_deeply(key_def_composite:totable(), exp, 'composite case')
end)
-- Case: __serialize().
@@ -447,7 +484,7 @@ end)
-- Case: merge().
test:test('merge()', function(test)
- test:plan(6)
+ test:plan(8)
local key_def_a = key_def_lib.new({
{type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 1},
@@ -488,6 +525,37 @@ test:test('merge()', function(test)
'case 3: verify with :totable()')
test:is_deeply(key_def_cb:extract_key(tuple_a):totable(),
{1, 1, box.NULL, 22}, 'case 3: verify with :extract_key()')
+
+ local parts_unsigned = {
+ {type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 1, is_nullable = false},
+ }
+ local key_def_unsigned = key_def_lib.new(parts_unsigned)
+ local key_def_string = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'string', fieldno = 1},
+ })
+ local key_def_array = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'array', fieldno = 1},
+ {type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 2},
+ })
+ local key_def_map = key_def_lib.new({
+ {type = 'map', fieldno = 3, is_nullable = true},
+ {type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 2},
+ })
+
+ -- This test case just shows current behavior and it's presence does not
+ -- mean that the behaviour has to remain the same in future
+ local key_def_unsigned_string = key_def_unsigned:merge(key_def_string)
+ test:is_deeply(key_def_unsigned_string:totable(), parts_unsigned,
+ 'in case of conflict we just get the field from the first key_def')
+
+ local key_def_array_map = key_def_array:merge(key_def_map)
+ local exp_parts = {
+ {type = 'array', fieldno = 1, is_nullable = false},
+ {type = 'unsigned', fieldno = 2, is_nullable = false},
+ {type = 'map', fieldno = 3, is_nullable = true},
+ }
+ test:is_deeply(key_def_array_map:totable(), exp_parts,
+ 'composite case')
end)
os.exit(test:check() and 0 or 1)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] key_def: support composite types extraction
2020-10-13 12:02 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] key_def: support composite types extraction Ilya Kosarev
@ 2020-10-13 13:22 ` Kirill Yukhin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Yukhin @ 2020-10-13 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilya Kosarev; +Cc: tarantool-patches, alexander.turenko
Hello,
On 13 окт 15:02, Ilya Kosarev wrote:
> key_def didn't support key definitions with array, map, varbinary & any
> fields. Thus they couldn't be extracted with
> key_def_object:extract_key(). Since the restriction existed due to
> impossibility of such types comparison, this patch removes the
> restriction for the fields extraction and only leaves it for
> comparison.
>
> Closes #4538
> ---
> Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/i.kosarev/gh-4538-key_def-extract-arrays
> Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/4538
I've checked your patch into master and added an entry to relase notes.
--
Regards, Kirill Yukhin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-13 13:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-13 12:02 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v4] key_def: support composite types extraction Ilya Kosarev
2020-10-13 13:22 ` Kirill Yukhin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox