Tarantool development patches archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Kaplun <skaplun@tarantool.org>
To: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org>
Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org
Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2] rfc: luajit metrics
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:57:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903125712.GA13242@root> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200827191837.GD18920@tarantool.org>

Igor,

Thanks for your review!

On 27.08.20, Igor Munkin wrote:
> Sergey,
> 
> Thanks, this RFC is almost great! Please consider my comments below.
> 
> On 26.07.20, Sergey Kaplun wrote:
> > Part of #5187
> > ---
> > 
> > This patch adds RFC to LuaJIT metrics interfaces. Nevertheless name
> > `misc` for builtin library is not good and should be discussed, because
> > tons of user modules can use that name for their own libraies.
> > 
> > Branch: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/tree/skaplun/5187-luajit-metrics
> > Issue: https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5187
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Fixed typos
> > - Made comments more verbose
> > - Avoided flushing any of metrics after each call of luaM_metrics()
> > 
> >  doc/rfc/5187-luajit-metrics.md | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 doc/rfc/5187-luajit-metrics.md
> > 
> > diff --git a/doc/rfc/5187-luajit-metrics.md b/doc/rfc/5187-luajit-metrics.md
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000..2bd64cff4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/doc/rfc/5187-luajit-metrics.md
> > @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
> > +# LuaJIT metrics
> > +
> > +* **Status**: In progress
> > +* **Start date**: 17-07-2020
> > +* **Authors**: Sergey Kaplun @Buristan skaplun@tarantool.org,
> > +               Igor Munkin @igormunkin imun@tarantool.org,
> > +               Sergey Ostanevich @sergos sergos@tarantool.org
> > +* **Issues**: [#5187](https://github.com/tarantool/tarantool/issues/5187)
> > +
> > +## Summary
> > +
> > +LuaJIT metrics provide extra information about the Lua state. They consists of
> 
> Typo: s/consists/consist/.

Thanks!

> 
> > +GC metrics (overall amount of objects and memory usage), JIT stats (both
> > +related to the compiled traces and the engine itself), string hash hits/misses.
> > +
> > +## Background and motivation
> > +
> > +One can be curious about their application performance. We are going to provide
> > +various metrics about the several platform subsystems behaviour. GC pressure
> > +produced by user code can weight down all application performance. Irrelevant
> > +traces compiled by the JIT engine can just burn CPU time with no benefits as a
> > +result. String hash collisions can lead to DoS caused by a single request. All
> > +these metrics should be well monitored by users wanting to improve the
> > +performance of their application.
> > +
> > +## Detailed design
> > +
> > +For C API we introduce additional extension header <lmisclib.h> that provides
> > +interfaces for new LuaJIT C API extensions. The first interface in this header
> > +will be the following:
> 
> I propose the following rewording:
> | The additional header <lmisclib.h> is introduced to extend the existing
> | LuaJIT C API with new interfaces. The first function provided via this
> | header is the following:
> 

Sounds good, thanks!

> > +
> > +```
> > +/* API for obtaining various metrics from the platform. */
> 
> Typo: s/metrics from the platform/platform metrics/.

Thanks!

> 
> > +
> > +LUAM_API struct luam_Metrics *luaM_metrics(lua_State *L,
> > +					   struct luam_Metrics *dst);
> 
> Please, address the comments I left regarding the function signature
> here[1].
> 

Sure!

> > +```
> > +
> > +This function fills the structure pointed by `dst` with the corresponding
> > +metrics related to Lua state anchored to the given coroutine `L`. The result of
> > +the function is a pointer to the filled structure (the same `dst` points to).
> > +
> > +The `struct luam_Metrics` has the following definition:
> > +
> > +```
> > +struct luam_Metrics {
> 
> Please, address the comments I left regarding the structure definition
> here[1].

Sure!

> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Strings amount founded in string hash
> > +	 * instead of allocation of new one.
> > +	 */
> > +	size_t strhash_hit;
> > +	/* Strings amount allocated and put into string hash. */
> > +	size_t strhash_miss;
> > +
> > +	size_t strnum;   /* Amount of allocated string objects. */
> > +	size_t tabnum;   /* Amount of allocated table objects. */
> > +	size_t udatanum; /* Amount of allocated udata objects. */
> > +	size_t cdatanum; /* Amount of allocated cdata objects. */
> > +
> > +	/* Memory currently allocated. */
> > +	size_t gc_total;
> > +	/* Total amount of freed memory. */
> > +	size_t gc_freed;
> > +	/* Total amount of allocated memory. */
> > +	size_t gc_allocated;
> > +
> > +	/* Count of incremental GC steps per state. */
> > +	size_t gc_steps_pause;
> > +	size_t gc_steps_propagate;
> > +	size_t gc_steps_atomic;
> > +	size_t gc_steps_sweepstring;
> > +	size_t gc_steps_sweep;
> > +	size_t gc_steps_finalize;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Overall number of snap restores (and number of stopped
> > +	 * trace executions) for given jit_State.
> > +	 */
> > +	size_t jit_snap_restore;
> > +	/* Overall number of abort traces for given jit_State. */
> > +	size_t jit_trace_abort;
> > +	/* Total size of all allocated machine code areas. */
> > +	size_t jit_mcode_size;
> > +	/* Amount of JIT traces. */
> > +	unsigned int jit_trace_num;
> > +};
> > +```
> > +
> > +All metrics are collected throughout the platform uptime. But some of them
> > +(namely `strhash_hit`, `strhash_miss`, `gc_freed`, `gc_allocated`,
> > +`gc_steps_pause`, `gc_steps_propagate`, `gc_steps_atomic`,
> > +`gc_steps_sweepstring`, `gc_steps_sweep`, `gc_steps_finalize`,
> > +`jit_snap_restore` and `jit_trace_abort`) increase monotonic and can overflow.
> 
> Ouch, let's list these metrics in a bullet list for better readability.
> 
> Typo: s/monotonic/monotonically/.
> 

Yes, it will be better.

> > +They make sense only with comparing with their value from a previous
> > +`luaM_metrics()` call.
> > +
> > +There is also a complement introduced for Lua space -- `misc.getmetrics()`.
> > +This function is just a wrapper for `luaM_metrics()` returning a Lua table with
> > +the similar metrics. Its usage is quite simple:
> > +```
> > +$ ./src/tarantool
> > +Tarantool 2.5.0-267-gbf047ad44
> > +type 'help' for interactive help
> > +tarantool> misc.getmetrics()
> > +---
> > +- tabnum: 1812
> > +  gc_total: 1369927
> > +  strnum: 5767
> > +  jit_trace_num: 0
> > +  cdatanum: 89
> > +  jit_mcode_size: 0
> > +  udatanum: 17
> > +  jit_snap_restore: 0
> > +  gc_freed: 2239391
> > +  strhash_hit: 53759
> > +  gc_steps_finalize: 0
> > +  gc_allocated: 3609318
> > +  gc_steps_atomic: 6
> > +  gc_steps_sweep: 296
> > +  gc_steps_sweepstring: 17920
> > +  jit_trace_abort: 0
> > +  strhash_miss: 6874
> > +  gc_steps_propagate: 10106
> > +  gc_steps_pause: 7
> > +...
> > +```
> > -- 
> > 2.24.1
> > 
> 
> Otherwise, LGTM.
> 
> 
> [1]: https://lists.tarantool.org/pipermail/tarantool-patches/2020-August/019208.html
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> IM

-- 
Best regards,
Sergey Kaplun

      reply	other threads:[~2020-09-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-26 20:40 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 0/2] Implement LuaJIT platform metrics Sergey Kaplun
2020-07-26 20:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 1/2] core: introduce various " Sergey Kaplun
2020-08-26 14:48   ` Igor Munkin
2020-08-26 15:52     ` Sergey Ostanevich
2020-08-27 18:42       ` Igor Munkin
2020-09-03 12:51     ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-07-26 20:40 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2 2/2] metrics: add C and Lua API Sergey Kaplun
2020-08-27 18:25   ` Igor Munkin
2020-09-03 14:44     ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-09-03 15:22       ` Igor Munkin
2020-09-04  5:29         ` Sergey Kaplun
2020-07-26 20:42 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2] rfc: luajit metrics Sergey Kaplun
2020-08-27 19:18   ` Igor Munkin
2020-09-03 12:57     ` Sergey Kaplun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200903125712.GA13242@root \
    --to=skaplun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=imun@tarantool.org \
    --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \
    --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v2] rfc: luajit metrics' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox