From: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> To: sergeyb@tarantool.org Cc: tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, alexander.turenko@tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 18/19] Add luacheck supression for luajit test Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 22:46:53 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200720194653.GI18920@tarantool.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <c9653cbece9e6dca2cebab422267de444e1d363f.1594907318.git.sergeyb@tarantool.org> Sergey, Here we go again... I wonder how exactly you tested LuaJIT related patch if you ended up suppressing the same warning both inline and within .luacheckrc. Consider the following: | $ git diff | cat | $ make luacheck | grep -F 'luajit' | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-3196-incorrect-string-length.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4427-ffi-sandwich.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4476-fix-string-find-recording.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4773-tonumber-fail-on-NUL-char.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-494-table-chain-infinite-loop.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-505-fold-no-strref-for-ptrdiff.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-524-fold-conv-respect-src-irt.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-flush-on-trace.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/or-232-unsink-64-kptr.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/utils.lua OK | $ git stash pop | $ git diff | cat | diff --git a/.luacheckrc b/.luacheckrc | index 21680c08c..2bc2eaa33 100644 | --- a/.luacheckrc | +++ b/.luacheckrc | @@ -171,12 +171,6 @@ files["test/long_run-py/suite.lua"] = { | "delete_insert", | } | } | -files["test/luajit-tap/or-232-unsink-64-kptr.test.lua"] = { | - ignore = { | - -- An empty if branch. | - "542", | - } | -} | files["test/replication/replica_quorum.lua"] = { | globals = { | "INSTANCE_URI", | $ make luacheck | grep -F 'luajit' | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-3196-incorrect-string-length.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4427-ffi-sandwich.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4476-fix-string-find-recording.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/gh-4773-tonumber-fail-on-NUL-char.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-494-table-chain-infinite-loop.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-505-fold-no-strref-for-ptrdiff.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-524-fold-conv-respect-src-irt.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/lj-flush-on-trace.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/or-232-unsink-64-kptr.test.lua OK | Checking /home/imun/projects/tarantool-review/test/luajit-tap/utils.lua OK So what does this suppression fix? Actually nothing. Please drop this suppression from .luacheckrc (and thereby the patch itself). By the way, I see another problem: - Wait, it's all just luacheck failing on luajit tests? | $ git co HEAD^ | $ git log --oneline -1 | cat | c9653cbec Add luacheck supression for luajit test | $ make luacheck || echo "Always has been" | <snipped> | Total: 95 warnings / 0 errors in 492 files | make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/luacheck.dir/build.make:58: luacheck] Error 1 | make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:430: CMakeFiles/luacheck.dir/all] Error 2 | make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:437: CMakeFiles/luacheck.dir/rule] Error 2 | make: *** [Makefile:316: luacheck] Error 2 | Always has been I guess the agreement to make the series passing <luacheck> after *every* patch still stands (like you made for src/ and extra/ directories). I doubt we should violate this rule for test/. On 16.07.20, sergeyb@tarantool.org wrote: > From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> > > Part of #4681 > > Reviewed-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> > --- > .luacheckrc | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/.luacheckrc b/.luacheckrc > index 2bc2eaa33..21680c08c 100644 > --- a/.luacheckrc > +++ b/.luacheckrc <snipped> > -- > 2.26.2 > -- Best regards, IM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 19:57 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-16 14:11 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/19] Add static analysis of Lua code in test/ with luacheck sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 01/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/app-tap sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 02/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/app sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 03/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 04/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box-py sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 05/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box-tap sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 06/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/engine sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 07/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/engine_long sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 08/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/long_run-py sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 09/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/replication sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 10/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/replication-py sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 11/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/sql sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 12/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/sql-tap sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 13/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/swim sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 14/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/vinyl sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 15/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/wal_off sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 16/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/xlog sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 17/19] Fix luacheck warnings in test/xlog-py sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 18/19] Add luacheck supression for luajit test sergeyb 2020-07-20 19:46 ` Igor Munkin [this message] 2020-07-21 11:52 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-07-21 12:38 ` Igor Munkin 2020-07-16 14:11 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 19/19] luajit: bump new version sergeyb 2020-07-16 14:18 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH] test: fix warnings spotted by luacheck sergeyb 2020-07-20 18:26 ` Igor Munkin 2020-10-30 13:59 ` Kirill Yukhin 2020-07-17 8:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 00/19] Add static analysis of Lua code in test/ with luacheck Sergey Bronnikov 2020-08-07 9:19 ` Igor Munkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200720194653.GI18920@tarantool.org \ --to=imun@tarantool.org \ --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH 18/19] Add luacheck supression for luajit test' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox