From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> To: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> Cc: o.piskunov@tarantool.org, tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org, v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org, alexander.turenko@tarantool.org Subject: Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 09/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:23:45 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200716132345.GB8696@pony.bronevichok.ru> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200601160642.GS21558@tarantool.org> Igor, On 19:06 Mon 01 Jun , Igor Munkin wrote: > Sergey, > > Thanks for the patch! > > Again, I see a mess in the branch. Please review yourself before sending > the patchset: mixed tabs and spaces, unsorted enries in .luacheckrc -- > we are talking about it since I joined the review (i.e. v3 series). Now > it's a v6 and I definitely don't want another one, but I doubt we will > avoid it. Furthermore the changes you made in scope of this patch just > partially fix the problem. Yes, I see you committed/rebased some > follow-up patches on the branch few hours ago and it's another > consequence of omitting self-review. Hasty fixes are not necessary (I > have another patchesets to be reviewed and my own tasks), but pointing > to the same mistakes just makes me frustrating. It would be great if you > re-check yourself once more before running git send-email next time. > This will definitely make the review process much easier, efficient and > ergo faster. > > Please send follow-up patches to this thread, since it's too hard to > comment the changes you made after the series was sent. > > I reviewed this one and its follow-up you recently pushed. Please > consider the comments below. > > On 29.05.20, sergeyb@tarantool.org wrote: > > From: Sergey Bronnikov <sergeyb@tarantool.org> > > > > Part of #4681 > > > > Reviewed-by: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> > > Reviewed-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> > > > > Co-authored-by: Vladislav Shpilevoy <v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org> > > Co-authored-by: Igor Munkin <imun@tarantool.org> > > --- > > .luacheckrc | 13 +++++++++++++ > > test/box/box.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/hash_multipart.result | 2 +- > > test/box/hash_multipart.test.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/bitset.lua | 7 ++----- > > test/box/lua/cfg_bad_vinyl_dir.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_rtree.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test1.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test2.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test3.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test4.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test5.lua | 4 ++-- > > test/box/lua/cfg_test6.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/fifo.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/identifier.lua | 9 ++++----- > > test/box/lua/index_random_test.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/lua/require_init.lua | 3 --- > > test/box/lua/test_init.lua | 10 +++++----- > > test/box/lua/utils.lua | 13 ++++++------- > > test/box/on_schema_init.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/proxy.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/tiny.lua | 2 +- > > test/box/tree_pk.result | 4 ++-- > > test/box/tree_pk.test.lua | 4 ++-- > > 24 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/.luacheckrc b/.luacheckrc > > index 630834e16..f99cc17eb 100644 > > --- a/.luacheckrc > > +++ b/.luacheckrc > > @@ -41,3 +41,16 @@ files["src/box/lua/schema.lua"] = {globals = {"tonumber64"}, ignore = {"431", "4 > > files["test/app/lua/fiber.lua"] = {globals = {"box_fiber_run_test"}} > > files["test/app-tap/lua/require_mod.lua"] = {globals = {"exports"}} > > files["test/app-tap/string.test.lua"] = {globals = {"utf8"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/push.lua"] = {globals = {"push_collection"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/index_random_test.lua"] = {globals = {"index_random_test"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/utils.lua"] = { > > + globals = {"space_field_types", "iterate", "arithmetic", "table_shuffle", > > + "table_generate", "tuple_to_string", "check_space", "space_bsize", > > + "create_iterator", "setmap", "sort"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/bitset.lua"] = { > > + globals = {"create_space", "fill", "delete", "clear", "drop_space", > > + "dump", "test_insert_delete"} > > One more time: please sort the entries. It *really* helps for reviewing > and further maintenance. I don't want to refer the last time I was > asking it, please just fix. I have splitted lines per variable and sorted alphabetically. Update is in a branch and a new patch series. > One more time: please adjust the indentation (tabs vs spaces) and to use > only one as we already discussed several times. I don't want to refer > the last time I was asking it, please just fix. Fixed too. > Furthermore, I can't figure out the rules you're using for indentation. > .luacheckrc is kinda Lua source file, so please adjust it regarding our > contrubition guide. The result should be similar to the example below: > | files["test/box/lua/bitset.lua"] = { > | globals = { > | "create_space", "fill", "delete", "clear", "drop_space", > | "dump", "test_insert_delete" > | } > | } > > Feel free to put each global entry to a seraparate line if it seems > better for you. As said above I have put each entry to a separate line. > > +} > > +files["test/box/lua/fifo.lua"] = {globals = {"fifomax", "find_or_create_fifo", "fifo_push", "fifo_top"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/identifier.lua"] = {globals = {"run_test"}} > > +files["test/box/lua/require_mod.lua"] = {globals = {"exports"}} > > <snipped> > > I see no rule for checking .result files, *but* I know the exact reason, > why I see such changes in the patch. The mask ought to be updated *prior > to or together with* the changes. Please remove this change, since > test/box/hash_miltipart.test.lua is a diff-based test, thereby has to be > skipped by luacheck as we discussed several times. reviewed overall patch series and removed all changes for diff-based tests > > diff --git a/test/box/hash_multipart.result b/test/box/hash_multipart.result > > index e94313b62..e6915652f 100644 > > --- a/test/box/hash_multipart.result > > +++ b/test/box/hash_multipart.result > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ test_run:cmd("setopt delimiter ';'") > > function select_all() > > local result = {} > > local tuple, v > > - for tuple, v in hash:pairs() do > > + for _, v in hash:pairs() do > > table.insert(result, v) > > end > > return result > > diff --git a/test/box/hash_multipart.test.lua b/test/box/hash_multipart.test.lua > > index c0a871bee..c572d13b6 100644 > > --- a/test/box/hash_multipart.test.lua > > +++ b/test/box/hash_multipart.test.lua > > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ test_run:cmd("setopt delimiter ';'") > > function select_all() > > local result = {} > > local tuple, v > > - for tuple, v in hash:pairs() do > > + for _, v in hash:pairs() do > > table.insert(result, v) > > end > > return result > > <snipped> > > I failed to find any source that uses require_init.lua, require_mod.lua > (except require_init.lua) and test_init.lua. Looks these chunk can be > just dropped. But I'm totally against such actions in scope of this > patch, so please revert the changes related to these files, add them to > the exclude list like you did for test_init.lua in the follow-up patch > and create an issue for further actions. Well, marked them to be dropped: "test/app/*.test.lua", - "test/box/**/*.lua", + "test/box/*.test.lua", + -- Unused source file, to be dropped (gh-5169). + "test/box/lua/require_init.lua", + -- Unused source file, to be dropped (gh-5169). + "test/box/lua/require_mod.lua", + -- Unused source file, to be dropped (gh-5169). + "test/box/lua/test_init.lua", "test/box-py/**/*.lua", > > diff --git a/test/box/lua/require_init.lua b/test/box/lua/require_init.lua > > <snipped> > > > diff --git a/test/box/lua/test_init.lua b/test/box/lua/test_init.lua > > <snipped> > > > diff --git a/test/box/on_schema_init.lua b/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > > index 17cf89166..f74d6d7fe 100644 > > --- a/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > > +++ b/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > > Here is the diff from the follow-up patch: > > | diff --git a/test/box/on_schema_init.lua b/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > | index f74d6d7fe..a32470b40 100644 > | --- a/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > | +++ b/test/box/on_schema_init.lua > | @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ > | #!/usr/bin/env tarantool > | local os = require('os') > | > | -function test_before_replace_trig(old, new) > | +local function test_before_replace_trig(old, new) -- luacheck: ignore > > I see no reason to use "ignore" here and below instead of "no unused > args" that explicitly describes the suppressed warning. I have set exact ignore reason in a luacheck comment > | -- return multiple values so that the stack fills earlier. > | return new:update{{'+', 2, 1}}, new:update{{'+', 2, 1}}, new:update{{'+', 2, 1}}, new:update{{'+', 2, 1}} > | end > | > | -function space_on_replace_trig(old, new) > | +local function space_on_replace_trig(old, new) -- luacheck: ignore > | if new and new[3] == 'test_on_schema_init' then > | box.on_commit(function() > | box.space.test_on_schema_init:before_replace(test_before_replace_trig) > | @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ function space_on_replace_trig(old, new) > | end > | end > | > | -function on_init_trig() > | +local function on_init_trig() > | box.space._space:on_replace(space_on_replace_trig) > | end > | > > <snipped> > > Again, the changeset below is made for diff-based tests, please drop it. Done. > > diff --git a/test/box/tree_pk.result b/test/box/tree_pk.result > > index df3c78bed..f2a4f5352 100644 > > --- a/test/box/tree_pk.result > > +++ b/test/box/tree_pk.result > > @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ test_run:cmd("setopt delimiter ';'") > > ... > > function crossjoin(space0, space1, limit) > > local result = {} > > - for state, v0 in space0:pairs() do > > - for state, v1 in space1:pairs() do > > + for _, v0 in space0:pairs() do > > + for _, v1 in space1:pairs() do > > if limit <= 0 then > > return result > > end > > diff --git a/test/box/tree_pk.test.lua b/test/box/tree_pk.test.lua > > index 1190ab424..86041a642 100644 > > --- a/test/box/tree_pk.test.lua > > +++ b/test/box/tree_pk.test.lua > > @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ test_run = env.new() > > test_run:cmd("setopt delimiter ';'") > > function crossjoin(space0, space1, limit) > > local result = {} > > - for state, v0 in space0:pairs() do > > - for state, v1 in space1:pairs() do > > + for _, v0 in space0:pairs() do > > + for _, v1 in space1:pairs() do > > if limit <= 0 then > > return result > > end > > -- > > 2.23.0 > > > > -- > Best regards, > IM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 13:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-29 15:08 [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 00/25] Add static analysis with luacheck sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:08 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 01/25] Add initial luacheck config sergeyb 2020-05-29 16:04 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 16:27 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-30 12:19 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-05-30 12:18 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-05-29 15:08 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 02/25] build: enable 'make luacheck' target sergeyb 2020-05-29 16:28 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 15:08 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 03/25] gitlab-ci: enable static analysis with luacheck sergeyb 2020-05-29 19:25 ` Igor Munkin 2020-06-01 9:29 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-06-01 9:48 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 04/25] Fix luacheck warnings in extra/dist/tarantoolctl.in sergeyb 2020-05-29 16:35 ` Igor Munkin 2020-06-01 14:10 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 05/25] Fix luacheck warnings in src/lua/ sergeyb 2020-05-29 16:51 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 19:13 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-30 12:15 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-06-01 9:43 ` Igor Munkin 2020-06-01 10:36 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-06-01 9:38 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-06-01 14:47 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 06/25] Fix luacheck warnings in src/box/lua/ sergeyb 2020-05-29 19:11 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-30 12:22 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 07/25] Supress luacheck warnings in test/app sergeyb 2020-06-01 10:11 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 08/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/app-tap sergeyb 2020-06-01 11:41 ` Igor Munkin 2020-07-16 11:44 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-07-16 12:42 ` Igor Munkin 2020-07-16 13:25 ` Sergey Bronnikov 2020-06-01 13:37 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-06-01 16:37 ` Igor Munkin 2020-06-01 17:13 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-06-01 17:38 ` Igor Munkin 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 09/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box sergeyb 2020-06-01 16:06 ` Igor Munkin 2020-07-16 13:23 ` Sergey Bronnikov [this message] 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 10/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box-py sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 11/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box-tap sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 12/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/engine sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 13/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/engine_long sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 14/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/long_run-py sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 15/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/replication sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 16/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/replication-py sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 17/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/sql sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 18/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/sql-tap sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 19/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/swim sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 20/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/vinyl sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 21/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/wal_off sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 22/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/xlog sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 23/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/xlog-py sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 24/25] Add luacheck supressions for luajit tests sergeyb 2020-05-29 15:09 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 25/25] luajit: bump new version sergeyb 2020-06-01 17:08 ` [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 00/25] Add static analysis with luacheck Vladislav Shpilevoy 2020-06-01 17:29 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-06-01 18:13 ` Igor Munkin 2020-06-02 14:42 ` Alexander Turenko 2020-06-02 15:58 ` Igor Munkin
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200716132345.GB8696@pony.bronevichok.ru \ --to=sergeyb@tarantool.org \ --cc=alexander.turenko@tarantool.org \ --cc=imun@tarantool.org \ --cc=o.piskunov@tarantool.org \ --cc=tarantool-patches@dev.tarantool.org \ --cc=v.shpilevoy@tarantool.org \ --subject='Re: [Tarantool-patches] [PATCH v6 09/25] Fix luacheck warnings in test/box' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox